Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Cognitive theories - Coggle Diagram
Cognitive theories
MORAL REALISM
-
-
-
We all have moral knowledge and ethical statements are either factual and can be proven true or false
ETHICAL NATURALISM
-
These properties can be reduced to entirely non-ethical or natural properties e.g. desires or pleasures
-
-
-
AQUINAS
-
-
-
Moral values can be worked out by understanding our God-given purpose as the world has a God-given order built into it
-
F.H. Bradley
-
Morality rests on certain facts about ourselves, goals and place in society
-
-
-
-
-
STRENGTHS
-
-
-
-
WEAKNESSES
-
David Hume, moral judgements come from perceptions and arise from the human mind; they're not facts that exist by themselves
-
INTUITIONISM
-
Moral truths exist, statements made about right and wrong can either be true or false
However, believe that moral truths can't be discovered naturally by observation of the world
So, is known as ethical non-naturalism
Right and wrong are self-evident, were able to know them by our intuition
G.E. MOORE
THE NATURALISTIC FALLACY
-
G.E. Moore, to explain good in terms of natural properties such as pleasure is to commit the naturalistic fallacy
Thought that good cannot be equated with something else, it is not the same
If we say something is good because it produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number were defining good as something else- maximal happiness
-
-
-
-
-
Rejected Utilitarian approach stating goodness can be defined, measured, quantified and qualified
-
-
“We know what ‘yellow’ is and can recognise it whenever it is seen, but we cannot actually define yellow. In the same way, we know what good is, but we cannot define it”
Good is a simple notion, just as yellow is- you know it when you see it
-
No place for discussion about proof because methods of proving require evidence from the empirical world
-
H.A. PRITCHARD
-
-
-
-
If obligations conflict, must be decided which obligation is greater
W.D. ROSS
-
-
-
Good, right, obligatory are indefinable
PRIMA FACIE DUTIES
Deontologist: It's obvious certain types of actions prima facie duties (duties at first sight) were right
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Believed when these prima duties conflicted, we must follow the one we think is right
-
-
Doesn’t tell us which one to follow in moral conflict, depends on the persons moral maturity
STRENGTHS
-
-
WEAKNESSES
How can we be sure our intuitions are correct?
Everyone's different & affected by environment, religion
-
-