Narrow span advantages- There is tight control over employees. This can lead to the objectives of the business being administrated. Furthermore, tight control of employees, with less employees to control, means that there can be direct feedback. According to Hackman and Oldman, job feedback is a factor which increases motivation in employees, because the performance on their task has been validated. This would lead to high labour productivity and therefore, more efficiency.
Disadvantage- more layers of the hierarchy may be required to administrate control. This could lead to increased labour costs, reducing their profit increase that would have been received from the more efficient workforce.
Conclusion: wide span of control would be more appropriate because job motivation is executed more sufficiently. By having autonomy, the employees are indirectly receiving feedback and reassurance that their performance is beneficial because they have been trusted to work almost independently. The most important reason that a wide span of control would be better is because direct feedback that people receive in narrow may be de-motivating or misleading. For example, being told they are an asset to the company, but still being governed with tight control which limits them to work freely.
-