Crime and Deviance - Gender (flashcards done)

Female Crime x

Male Crime x

Stats x

95% of prison population is male

men are convicted for 6 indictable offences to every 1 committed by a woman

Underestimated

typical female crimes such as shoplifting are less likely to be reported. female types of crime are more likely to go unnoticed.

women are more likely to get let off lightly.

Chivalry Thesis - Pollak (1950) x

argues that the CJS is dominated by men, who are socialised to act in a chivalrous way towards women (benevolent and protective view of female offending).

this means that women offenders are seen as less guilty, more vulnerable and in need of protection. As such they are treated more leniently, so their crimes are less likely to feature in official statistics

this creates a distorted picture is generated, exaggerating the gender differences in crime rates.

Evaluation

Walklate 1998 x

Carlen 1998 x

Heidensohn 2002 x

Farrington and Morris 1983 x

women are not always treated "Chivalrously" by the CJS - in rape cases it is not the defendant who is on trial but the victim, since she has to prove her respectability in order to have her evidence accepted

Fitting certain stereotypes of women impact their experience of the CJS (sex work; racism; etc)

Double Deviancy

Differences in sentencing almost disappear when severity of crime is taken into account

changing gender roles x

men still commit more crime, however this trend is changing nationally/internationally

women have more independence, more successful careers, more time out on the streets, so are more evident to the surveillance authorities.

lower crime rate

Lombroso and Ferrero x

criminality is innate, but it's rare for female criminals to be born

sociologists reject this and have put forward explanations of female cirminality.

Sex Role Theory - FUNCTIONALIST AND NEW RIGHT x

socialisation - boys are meant to be tough and aggressive and take risks, whereas girls are meant to take a more expressive role

Parsons x - sees crime rates differ due to gender roles in the nuclear family.
> Females remain at home to socialise the children
> Boys tend to distance themselves from female models and engage in compensatory compulsory masculinity

Cohen (1955) x - The lack of adult male role models means boys are more likely to turn to male gangs as a source of masculine identity.
Status gained by toughness/aggression

Evaluation

Walklate (2003) x - Argues that theory is biologically determinist. The theory suggests that women are best at child rearing just because they can bear children (not really based on socialisation)

Liberation Thesis - Adler 1975 x

Patriarchal Control - Heidensohn - RADICAL FEMINIST x

imposes greater control over women, meaning they gave double jeopardy of stigma and being considered an unfeminine, uncaring woman.

the patriarchy controls women in three areas: Home, Public and Work

females therefore have fewer opportunities to commit crime.

Evaluation x

However, it recognises that patriarchy can have the adverse impact of pushing women into crime e.g., prostitution, etc

Class and Gender deals - Carlen - MARXIST FEMINIST x

Study - Carlen conducted a study following w/c women who had criminal convictions. She argues that most serious crimes are committed by the w/c

women are encouraged to conform by the following of 2 deals: the class deal and the gender deal

most women accept and achieve these deals. Sometimes these deals are not available because of poverty, unemployment or domestic violence. Women then take the rational decision to commit crime as they have little to lose.

many women reached the conclusion that, 'Crime was the only route to a decent standard of living, they has nothing to lose and everything to gain'

as women become liberated from patriarchy their crime becomes more frequent.

weaker gender roles control than in the past - women now out and about, not just socialising at home (Heidensohn - work, home, public)

as a result, women have begun to adopt traditional male roles in work as controls and discrimination lessen. This leads to women committing more male type crimes, with greater opportunity to commit these crimes.

Evidence

female crime rose to 1 in 6 from 1 in 7 between the 1950s and 1990s

Hand and Dodd (2009) x - found that between 2000-2008, police stats show a 17% yearly increase in violent female crime

Evaluation

female crime rate started to rise before women's liberation

Carlen x - w/c women are more likely to be criminal, but they are the least affected by women's liberation

Chesney-Lind x - found that women did go into male crimes, however, this was more likely due to prostitution links.

Adler x - draws attention to women's changing position and patterns of crime.

Ladette culture - Denscombe (2001) x

found that there is a masculinised 'ladette' culture, in which young women are: Binge drinking; Joining gangs; Taking part in more risk behaviour to look tough

Sharpe (2009) x - found that professionals in the CJS are influenced by media stereotypes of violent 'ladettes', meaning that moral panics are causing the sentences given to females are becoming harsher.

Evaluation

Heidensohn and Silvestri (2012) x - suggested that the reported increase in female violence is down to changes in labelling and criminalisation of girls' bad behaviour.

Females and Violent crime

Hand and Dodd (2009) x - support Adler's theory in finding that females arrested for violent crime rose by an average of 17% per year.

Steffensmeier and Schwartz (2009) x - found that although female arrests rates for violence have increased, there was no increase in victim surveys blaming attacks on females.

therefore, this suggests that female involvement of crime hasn't changed, but that the CJS is just net widening by arresting women for less serious crimes.

USA DV mandatory arrests - Chesney-Lind (2006) x - found that where both couples have been fighting, both are arrested, even is the woman id the victim, therefore increasing arrest statistics.

Gender and Victimisation x

CSEW

young men are twice as likely to be victims of violent crime

women are more likely to be victims of intimate crimes - sexual assault, DV, etc. These crimes are also least likely to be reported to the police and/or lead to conviction

Walby and Allen (2004) x - investigated the notion that victims surveys do not necessarily convey the frequency of victimizations. They found that women are likely to be victim of multiple DV acts...

1 in 4 women, and 1 in 6 men, experience DV at some point in their lives

150 people are killed by a partner each year - 80% of which are female.

only 40% of incidents are reported to the police - then only 5% of this results in conviction.

Homicide Victims x

approximately 70% of homicide victims are male

female victims are more likely to know their killer (in 60% of these cases it was their partner of ex-partner)

males are more likely to be killed by a friend or an acquaintance

street homicides are usually committed by men and male victims

women are more likely to be affected by homicides in the home

Victims of Violence x

2% of women are victims of violence, compared to 4% of men

women are most likely to be victimised by an acquaintance, men by a stranger

31% of women were victims of intimate violence, compared to only 18% of men

10x more women reported being victims of sexual assault than men

only 8% of females who had experiences serious sexual assault reported it to the police (1/3 of those who didn't, said they didn't believe police could do much about it)

Feminist theory x

research attempts to better understand how gender influences victimisation risk, types of victimisation, and other key factors

they see gender as socially constructed, despite this, it is a social construct that has very real and tangible consequences in out society

Positivist theory x

they argue that people contribute towards their own victimhood through certain characteristics or behaviour

E.G. Walking home alone in the dark is seen as contributing towards their own possible victimhood

they blame victims for putting temptation in front of criminals. This helps to explain certain current patterns in gender and victim statistics

heavily accused of victim blaming, and other theorists claim they are taking some of the blame away from the criminal

Assertion of Masculinity - Messerschmidt x

looks at how men actively create hegemonic masculine identities

masculinity is reinforced by peer groups, which can result in higher levels of criminality amongst young men in the desire to prove they are real men.

masculinity is a social construct and has to be constantly worked on

there are different masculinities in society which co-exist, however, the main dominant one is hegemonic masculinity

however, access to this hegemonic masculinity is not equal - some men have alternative masculinities

some men have subordinate masculinities. These include gay men, who have no desire to achieve hegemonic masculinity, as well as some lower-class and ethnic minorities, who lack the resources to do so.

Masculinity and Crime x

Messerschmidt 1993 - masculinity is a social construct or 'accomplishment' and men have to constantly work at constructing and presenting it to others

Crime is a way of showing masculinity and 'manliness' … when legitimate and traditional means are blocked.

white W/C lads have little chance of hegemonic success in or out of school so turn to oppositional subcultures and are involved in non-utilitarian crimes

E.G. Opposing teacher authority/show toughness. This lead to lack of ED, meaning difficulties arise in getting a job.

therefore the poorer groups may use street crimes to achieve subordinated masculinity

hegemonic masculinity helps to explain why W/C men try to assert their masculinity through ruthlessness, ambition, thrill-seeking, potentially leading to white collar crime thereby accomplishing their hegemonic masculinity

Masculinity Crisis x

hegemonic masculinity is in crisis due to the rise in feminism and the blurring of social roles, therefore men turn to crime to feel "like a man"

Postmodernist ideas x

Winlow (2001) x

globalisation has led to the loss of many traditional manual jobs.

In the past, men were able to express their masculinity by hard physical labour and providing for their families. To replace this lost through globalisation, a night time leisure industry has been created, where men can work as security in clubs, bars and pubs

This has provided a combination of legal employment, criminal opportunities and a means of expressing masculinity

Used bouncers in Sunderland to demonstrate this idea. High levels of deprivation. Working as bouncers in pubs and clubs provided young men with paid work, as well as the opportunity for illegal business ventures in drug and alcohol

They were also able to demonstrate their masculinity through the use of violence

the signs of masculinity are two fold, they enable men to obtain jobs but also to show potential competitors that they can handle themselves - BODILY CAPITAL

Heidensohn and Silvestri (2012) x - gender differences are the most significant feature of recording crime

4/5 convicted offenders in England and Wales are male

by the age of 40, 9% of females have a criminal conviction compared with 32% of males

a higher proportion of female then male offenders are convicted of property offences (except burglary).

a higher proportion of male than female offenders are convicted of violence or sexual offences

men are more likely to be repeat offenders, to have longer criminal careers and to commit more serious crimes.

For example, men are about 15 times more likely to be convicted of homicide

Graham and Cowling (1995) - self-report study x

from a sample of 1,721 14-25 yrs they found that while men were more likely to offend, it was a lower difference than in official statistics.

while men were 2.33x more likely to admit to committing an offence, official statistics placed this at 4x more likely to offend.

Buckle and Farrington 1984 x

found that while there was twice as many male shop lifters, they were shown to be equal in number between male and female in official statistics - CJS can work against women to increase their offending rate

Yearnshire 1997 x

ignores that fact that many male crimes go unreported - women typically suffer 35 assaults before reporting domestic violence to the police.

Bias against women

many feminist argue against the chivalry thesis and instead the CJS is harsher against women. this is because it is patriarchal - e.g. rape cases

Heidensohn 1996 x - courts treat women more harshly when they do not conform to gender norms

double standards - girls and not boys are punished for premature or promiscuous sexual activity

women who do not conform to accepted standards of monogamous heterosexuality and motherhood are punish more harshly.

Carlen 1997 x - when women are jailed, it is less for 'the seriousness of their crimes and more according to the court's assessment of them as wives, moths and daughters'

Evaluation x

can be accused of seeing women's behaviour as determined by external forces such as patriarchal controls o r class and gender deal, when in fact free will and choice in offending have an impact

as a result, those lacking masculine-validating resources are more likely to be from more deprived backgrounds

evaluation

is it an explanation or just a description of male offenders - in danger of a circular argument.

does not explain why not all men use crime to accomplish masculinity

over-works the concept of masculinity to explain virtually all male crimes, from joy riding to embezzlement