Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
PROPÓSITO / RESEARCH QUESTION - Coggle Diagram
PROPÓSITO / RESEARCH QUESTION
Babbie (p. 116 e 447)
Explanatory
pointing causal relationship among variables; always indicate the rules applied that led to the conclusions; indicate the relative certainty or uncertainty of the conclusions.
Savage & Burrows (2007) believe that social scientist are not good at finding causality
Descriptive
always indicate if the description applies only to the sample or to the whole population.
Savage, Burrows (2007) argue that sociologists should focus on descriptions: 1) expose description, 2) challenge them, 3) create our own.
Exploratory
no começo; meio sem rumo; aponta possibilidades de pesquisas mais aprofundadas.
Concerned with the issue of manipulation of expectations about the future of GH2 by O&G cos. For economic gains. O&G cos. want GH2 under control. (Do I need to explain the reasons?!)
Planejamento do propósito: Escrever o relatório recomendado por Babbie p. 116, fim da primeira coluna. It will help figuring out which research designs are most appropriate.
"Tell them what you are going to tell them; tell them; and tell them what you told them"
Why does the vision of future of O&G cos. count?
How can my work be useful to society?
RESEARCH QUESTION
Cecilia Peres
How do understandings of X mutually shape each other in Y? (Ex: How do understandings of responsible quantum and responsible science mutually shape each other in Brazil, Germany and the US?)
How do X envision Y in the Z domain? (Ex: How do entrepreneurs envision ethical innovation processes in the quantum tech domain?)
How is X about Y articulated in Z? (Ex: How is hype about quantum technologies articulated in Germany?)
How can X be re-framed/re-conceptualized to be Y? (Ex: How can quantum be re-framed as a responsible technology?)
How do X conceptualize Y in the Z, and how do they construe K in the W domain? (Ex: How do innovators conceptualize responsibility in the quantum innovation process, and how do they construe risks and benefits in the quantum domain?)
How do X enact visions of Y in the Z domain? (Ex: How do key quantum stakeholders enact visions of ethical futures in the quantum domain?)
How is X co-shaping the Y, and what does Z mean across these different contexts? (Ex: How is the European RRI discourse co-shaping national quantum agendas in South America, and what does responsibility mean across these different contexts?)
How do X in the Y domain reconcile this with what? (Ex: How do key quantum stakeholders reconcile scientific uncertainty about quantum with the need to innovate for social benefit?)
How do X do this while acknowledging that? (Ex: How do quantum entrepreneurs freely innovate while acknowledging large-scale risks about the technologies they develop?)
How are X imagined in Y? By whom and for whom? (Ex: how are quantum futures imagined in Germany? By whom and for whom?)
How, and under which conditions, do X about Y vary across Z? (Ex: How, and under which conditions, do expectations about quantum technologies vary across different countries?)
What are the competing X for Y in Z, and who do K justify these W? (Ex: What are the competing ethical visions for quantum in Germany, Brazil and the US, and how do key quantum stakeholders justify these ethical visions?)
How do quantum innovators separate responsible from irresponsible quantum research and development, and how do they justify this differentiation? (Ex: How do X separate Y from Z, and how do they justify this differentiation?)
How does X shape Y in the Z domain in K? (Ex: How does the notion of “responsible” quantum futures shape national quantum strategies in Brazil, Germany and the US?)