Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Title 3: Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of…
Title 3: Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss in reference to human sciences and another area of knowledge.
-
format
-
par 1
-
-
slow to adopt because it requires lots of evidence (research, investigations/experiments, cross-checking, ensuring that the history/idea that is being shared is not false)
counter: personal experience/perspectives could be considered as the history of a certain individual
perspective based, whatever we believe aligns with our ideologies we will automatically accept (doesn't require cross checking or evidence --> quickly adopted
perspective based history, china korea/japan, biased perspectives, they still don't choose to adopt despite the new evidence/cross checking from history
some people scam their historical documents, therefore it might not be fully trustworthy
-
claim: due to the nature of the AOK, often times in history, it takes a long period of time before people adopt the new idea
par 2
-
claim: same point, but from an art perspective, people tend to accept new ideas immediately
there is no "wrong or right" within art, and people mainly think of it as a way for creative freedom, thus people tend to receive new ideas quickly as it comes across as creative
everyone has their own "creativity", and art is art, thus making it hard for anyone to reject it
counter: the new process/idea might not be new - explore the question "does a fresh idea mean it is better than the old one?"
-