Biological Approach to Personality

History of the field

Does Biology Cause Personality?

Four Temperaments

  • Most famous personality approach in history
  • Developed by Socrates

A dominant bodily fluid (“humour”) is associated with a personality type:

  • Phlegm: Phlegmatic, quiet, unemotional
  • Yellow bile: Choleric, impulsive, easily angered, irritable
  • Blood: Sanguine, lively, optimistic, courageous
  • Black bile: Melancholic, sad, depressive, pessimistic
    -> Perfect temperament would be balanced when all four exist equally

Phrenology

  • Personality is located in the brain (first theory to argue this)
  • Different parts of the skull are related to different personality characteristics
  • Skull adapts to the brain - can infer someone's personality through bumps in the skull

Criminal Personality

  • Lombroso, Italy 19th century
  • Used physiognomy, phrenology, and evolutionary theory to argue that some people are born criminals
  • Criminal behaviour is in part genetic
  • Can observe criminal personality by recognising specific facial features and skulls

Body Types and Personality

  • Lots of different theories from the 19th century
  • Kretschmer and Sheldon were the most influential
  • Body types reflect different kinds of personalities

3 different body types:

  • Ectomorphs - thin, leaner fragile bodies, introverted, self-conscious
  • Mesomorphs - muscular and rectangular body, aggressive, courageous
  • Endomorphs - well rounded bodies, tolerant, pleasant, likeable, want others to like them

Phrenology → personality traits are found to be localised and related to different brain structures, which vary in their volume (DeYoung et al., 2010)

Criminal personality → People are likely to differentiate criminal faces from non-criminal faces (Valla et al., 2011)

Contemporary Biological Approach

Corresponding to causes (correlates) of personality differences and processes

1) Anatomy of the CNS

3 main areas:

  • 1) Anatomy of the CNS
  • 2) Biochemistry (hormones, neurotransmitters)
  • 3) Genes and evolution

Frontal lobes - damage is associated with marked difference in personality traits e.g.:

  • Poor decision making, self-control, ability to plan
  • Psychothapy
  • Left lobe is more active when a person wants to approach something pleasant
  • Right lobe is more active when wanting to withdraw from something unpleasant or frightening

Amygdala - overactive amygdala associated with:

  • Anxiety, fear
  • Neuroticism
  • BPD
  • Negative emotions such as anger and fear
  • Important role in computing the degree to which a stimulus offers impending threat or reward

Big 5 and the Brain

DeYoung et al. (2010)
Tested whether the volume of different brain regions would correlate with the Big 5 traits (influence of phrenology)

Assumed:
“A greater-than-average volume of a specific brain structure may signify greater-than-average power to carry out specific functions associated with that structure, on the assumption that larger populations of neurons can produce larger outputs and can therefore be more influential than smaller populations of neurons.”

Method

  • 116 participants
  • Big 5 measure by Costa and McCrae
  • Structural brain scans to determine which parts of the brain are more or less developed

Findings
Significant relationships between different brain regions and personality traits


  • Neuroticism - associated with a few different areas e.g. posterior hippocampus and dorsomedial PFC, many regions appear to be involved in emotion regulation, threat, and punishment sensitivity
  • Conscientiousness - middle frontal gyrus was more developed among people who were high in conscientiousness
  • Similar for extraversion
  • Agreeableness - associated with less volume in posterior CC (on the right) and more volume on the STS (left)

2) Biochemistry

Hormones
Chemicals released by a gland, certain locations in our body but spread throughout in the bloodstream. Affect nerve cells that are sensitive to them and they can stimulate or inhibit activity

  • Testosterone - male sex hormone. Associated with aggression, dominance, anti-social behavioiur
  • Oversimplication to conclude it causes aggression
  • Seems to play a role in the control and inhibition of aggressiveness and sexuality - including normal assertiveness and perhaps even general activity level - as well as the normal range of sexual function and responsiveness in both sexes

Neurotransmitters
Chemical messengers in the brain, allow nerve cells to communicate with each other, transmit particular signals, travel across the synapse from one neuron to another

Dopamine - helps our brains control how we move our body but also related to rewards

  • Associated with extraversion, impulsivity, sensation seeking, openness
  • Severe lack of dopamine is the basis of Parkinson's disease

Serotonin - inhibits behavioural impulses, when depleted is associated with depression

  • Low serotonin associated with neuroticism and sensation seeking
  • Plays a role in the inhibition of behavioural impulses (stopping yourself from doing something unattractive yet dangerous)

Norepinephrine - fight or flight responses

  • Is both a neurotransmitter and a hormone but mainly acts as a neurotransmitter
  • Associated with neuroticism
  • Brain concentrated on source of threat in fight or flight - with higher levels of norepinephrine we are more likely to be neurotic

Cortisol - stress hormone. Associated with neuroticism, anxiety, depression

  • Chronically high levels of cortisol with people who have stress, anxiety, and depression
  • Chronically low levels of cortisol are associated with PTSD
  • Oxytocin - love hormone. Associated with less agression
  • Another hormone in the stress-response cascade
  • In females, promotes nurturant and sociable behaviour along with relaxation and reduction of fear (the opposite of fight or flight)
  • Causes people to be less fearful

Important caveat

Correlation ≠ causation
Research suggests changes in the environment and life experiences can affect changes in biochemistry
e.g. increase in testosterone in women with 'male dominated' jobs

Big 5 and Biological Basis

Emotional Stability (inverse of neuroticism)

  • Neurotransmitter: serotonin
  • Hormones: cortisol, norepinephrine
  • Brain structures: right frontal lobe (withdrawal), left frontal lobe (anger), amygdala, insular anterior cingulate

Agreeableness
Neurotransmitter: serotonin
Brain structures: left dorsalateral prefrontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, posterior cingulate cortex

Conscientiousness

  • Neurotransmitter: serotonin
  • Brain structure: middle frontal gyrus

Extraversion

  • Neurotransmitter: Dopamine
  • Hormones: endorphins
  • Brain Structures: medial orbito-frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, amygdala, striatum

Openness

  • Neurotransmitter: Dopamine
  • Brain structures: Left prefrontal cortex
  • Posterior medial prefrontal cortex

3) Genetic Influences

Humans share around 99% of the same genes

  • Apes share about 98%
  • Individual variability in the 1% is what we look at with gene studies

Twin study method

  • Self-report measures
  • Heritability coefficient → identical twins are given a particular self report test, both twins score that test, for pairs of twins you calculate the correlation coefficient between scores of twins, subtract them and then multiply by 2

Interpretation of hertiability is debateable. Not really just about nature vs. nurture

Basically the value is showing there is a genetic cause of a trait and there are some personality and other traits, if they are more similar in identical and not non-identical twins it points out there is a genetic cause

Bouchard (2004) Heritability of Big 5

  • Highest is openness to experience - 0.57
  • Extraversion - 0.54
  • Conscientiousness - 0.49
  • Neuroticism - 0.48
    Agreeableness - 0.42

Molecular Genetics

A) Candidate gene approach

  • Explores the prevalence of specific genes in a population high or low on a particular trait
  • Not replicable results

DRD4 - affects dopamine
Approach-related personality traits → extraversion, sensation seeking, novelty seeking

  • Associated with risk for ADHD which makes sense given the association between dopamine and regulation of cognition and behaviour as well as realted personality trait of impulsivity

DRD2 - also related to dopamine
Impulsivity, obesity, substance abuse

COMT - encodes a protein that breaks down the neurotransmitters dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine
Extraversion and reasoning abilities

  • Related to increased dopamine in PFC which leads to increased extraversion and reasoning ability

B) Genome-wide associations

  • Much more promising than approach A)
  • Needs very large samples to identify small effects (as the effect of a single gene is very low)

Investigates relationships between millions of DNA variants, which are called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotypic (personality) traits in very large samples

Many SNPs are combined into genome-wide polygenic scores (GPS)

  • GPS (in relation to a particular trait) is an individual score that can be used to predict genetic influences on personality traits - e.g. find out scores for different kinds of GPS e.g. neuroticism which can then be correlated with a measure for neuroticism

Genetic variants have been found to be associated with traits related to happiness, depression, and anxiety

Epigenetics

  • Genes tend to interact with the environment
  • Epigenetic influences are important
    Genes most certainly affect personality, and personality modifies, creates, and selects environments, which in turn may shape our personality during our life - impossible to disentangle personality from our environment

Genes and Evolution

  • If there are different genes underlying different personalities, then this has a survival value (at least thats what evolutionary theory tells us)
  • Evolutionary psychologists believe that those characteristics that helped humans survive are more likely to be present in future generations
  • Adaptive value is context dependent
  • Certain personality traits are adaptive in certain contexts but not in others

Phineas Gage:

  • 1848 railroad supervisor stood in the wrong place and a 3-foot rod was sent through his left cheek, into the frontal lobes of his brain and out through the top of his head
  • Lived for another 15 years
  • Retained some degree of mental functioning
  • However, his personality was fundamentally changed
  • Became irrevent, impateint, rude, obstinate
  • Inability to understand the emotions of others, and to appropriately regulate own impulses and feelings

Elliot:

  • Reported headaches and had a suspected brain tumour
  • Had surgery to remove tumour which removed a good deal of his cerebral cortex
  • Like Gage could speak clearly and no memory impairment
  • However, had serious judgment impairmnet
  • Lacking in rational decisionmaking
  • Inability to use emotional reactions

Finding from both:
Feelings tie the body to the brain. Without the ability to connect emotions to thinking, Gage and Elliot lost not only an important part of life's expereince, but also a crucial component of the ability to make decisions

Caspi et al. (2003)
Pioneer in exploring implications of gene-environment interactions

  • Followed group of children in NZ for decades
  • Assessed SES status and other environmental factors and then whether they experienced depression at the end of a 5 year period (between 21 to 25)
  • Short allelle of 5HTT gene were more likely to experience depressoin after stressful experiences than those without this allele
  • But, no difference in outcome between those with the long allele and those with the short allele if they had not suffered any stress

Perfect example of genotype-environment interaction: the genotype is important, but only for people who have experienced a certain kind of environment

Somatic marker hypothesis
Damasio (1994); emotions enable people to make decisions that maximise good outcomes and minimise bad ones, and to focus on what is really important

The frontal lobes are centres of cognitive control, serving to anticipate the future and plan for it

One recent theory proposes that two fundamental dimensions of personality - stability and plasticity - organise the traits of the Big Five into two groups.
A large amount of evidence suggests that the dopaminergic system is the foundation of plasticity, defined as a "general tendency to explore and engage with possibilities"

Market for SSRIs may be more than $20bn per year in the US

  • These pills are not 'happy pills' but seem to make negative emotions less severe whilst leaving positive emotions unaffected

For most traits:

  • The estimates of heritability garnered from studies of family resemblance that don't include twins average about 20% or half the average heritability estimed from twin studies
  • That is, estimates of heritability based on twin studies assume that individual genes and the environment act independently to influence personality, and these influences can simply be added up
  • But, genes can operate differently depending on the other genes that are present - genes will express themselves in different ways in different environments
  • As a result, while heritability estimates based on twins may be too high, those based on broader family relationships may be too low

Major meta-analysis concluded that the environment shared by siblings growing up was important in the development of several types of psychopathology during the period between childhood and adolescence:

  • Including conduct disorder, rebelliousness, anxiety, and depression
  • Only exception was ADHD which for the shared family environment did not seem to matter

Thousands of different genes are probably involved in complex traits such as sensation seeking or proneness to anxiety. The chance of finding a single gene that has a simple, direct, and easily understood effect on impulsiveness, anxiety or any other aspect of personality is virtually nil

Active person environment = 'niche picking' people tend to select and create environments that are compatible with and may magnify their genetically influences tendencies


Reactive person environment = the same environments that promoe good outcomes for some people can promote bad outcomes for others and vice versa