Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Nudge-Notes-1 - Coggle Diagram

- - - - In a rural community where traditional cooking methods are prevalent, a government introduces a subsidy program for clean cooking stoves. Initially, they set a significantly reduced price for clean stoves as an anchor. This low-cost anchor attracts early adopters, and as more households transition to clean cooking, the subsidy is gradually reduced, but the perception of affordability remains anchored to the initial, lower price.
    - - A nonprofit organization conducts a demonstration project in a village, providing families with clean cooking stoves and fuel. They carefully select influential community members to participate and showcase the benefits of clean cooking. The positive experiences of these influencers serve as anchors, motivating others in the village to adopt clean cooking practices, leading to a domino effect of adoption.
- - - - Implement public awareness campaigns that vividly depict the health risks associated with traditional cooking methods, such as respiratory diseases or indoor air pollution. These graphic campaigns make the dangers more available in people's minds, encouraging them to consider cleaner cooking alternatives.
    - - Showcase local success stories of individuals or families who have transitioned to clean cooking and experienced tangible benefits like improved health or reduced fuel expenses. These personal narratives make the benefits of clean cooking more salient and accessible to the community.
    - - Provide easily accessible and locally relevant data on the health consequences of traditional cooking practices, such as the number of respiratory illness cases or related hospital admissions. This information can highlight the real and immediate dangers of continuing with traditional cooking methods, making the risks more available in people's decision-making process.
- - - - Launch awareness campaigns highlighting the health risks associated with traditional cooking methods. Provide statistics and real-life stories to counter individuals' over-optimistic beliefs about their immunity to harm.
    - - Offer individuals personalized health risk assessments related to their cooking methods. For example, show them their estimated exposure to indoor air pollution and its potential health impact. This can make the risks more tangible and less subject to unrealistic optimism.
    - - Share testimonials or stories of people who suffered health issues due to traditional cooking practices, emphasizing that these were individuals who were initially optimistic about their immunity to harm. Peer comparisons can prompt individuals to reevaluate their own risk perceptions and consider cleaner cooking alternatives.
- - - - People have a strong aversion to losses and are typically twice as averse to losing something as they are motivated by gaining the same thing.
    - - Loss aversion has implications for public policy. For instance, discouraging the use of plastic bags is more effective when people are asked to pay a small amount for them rather than being rewarded for using reusable bags.
  - - - Introduce programs where users can trade in their traditional cooking fuels or stoves for cleaner alternatives at no additional cost. This creates a scenario where they perceive a loss if they do not make the switch, as they forfeit their existing equipment or fuel.
    - - Offer incentives or rebates to promote the adoption of energy-efficient clean cooking technologies. Initially, users pay the full price, but they receive cashback or rewards over time for using less fuel or reducing emissions. This approach emphasizes potential losses associated with not using energy-efficient alternatives.
- - - - Implement a subscription model for clean cooking fuel supply where users receive regular fuel deliveries unless they cancel or opt for traditional fuels. This capitalizes on inertia, as people are less likely to disrupt an ongoing subscription, increasing clean fuel usage.
    - - Utilize behavioral prompts, such as reminders and notifications, to encourage users to switch to clean cooking practices. These prompts can disrupt status quo bias by drawing attention to the need for change and providing clear steps for adoption.
- - - - Describe the benefits of clean cooking, such as reduced health risks and cost savings, in a positive and gain-oriented way. For example, "Switching to clean cooking saves you $200 annually" instead of "Not switching to clean cooking costs you $200 annually."
    - - Provide comparisons that highlight the advantages of clean cooking over traditional methods. For instance, "Clean cooking reduces indoor air pollution by 90%, while traditional cooking methods don't" emphasizes the superiority of clean cooking.
    - - Share information about how many households in the community have already adopted clean cooking. Use statements like "70% of your neighbors have embraced clean cooking" to create a sense of social norm and encourage adoption.
- - - - Fast and intuitive.
      - Uncontrolled and effortless.
      - Operates unconsciously.
      - Associated with gut reactions.
      - Prone to biases and errors.
      - Used for quick, instinctive decisions.
  - - - Slow and deliberate.
      - Controlled and effortful.
      - Operates consciously.
      - Involves critical thinking and analysis.
      - Used for complex decisions, calculations, and problem-solving.
      - Can override automatic responses to reduce biases and errors.
  - - - Use Automatic System: Create simple and emotionally resonant messages about the benefits of clean cooking, such as improved health and safety.
        
        Avoid complex technical details (Reflective System) that might overwhelm or confuse potential users.
        
        Example: A campaign featuring images of happy families using clean cookstoves with a slogan like "Cook Safely, Live Healthy" appeals to people's emotions and instincts.
    - - Use Framing Effect (Reflective System): Frame the adoption of clean cooking as a gain rather than a loss.
        
        Highlight the long-term cost savings, improved air quality, and reduced health risks as gains from using clean cookstoves.
        
        Emphasize the losses associated with traditional, polluting cooking methods, such as health expenses and environmental degradation.
        
        Example: Presenting clean cooking as an investment in a healthier and wealthier future rather than a cost.