Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitable the…

- - - - Perspectives
        
        Who is We in Natural Sciences?
        
        Who is We in History
      - Experts
      - People studying the field (find a name)
  - - - To Quick = very rapidly
      - To Quick = done skipping steps standard procedure or with lack of consideration
      - To Quick = both
  - - - Assumptions can be wrong or misguided and happen UNCONCIOUSLY (without thought) usually
      - Accepting is a conscious decision to receive something as true
    - - How does assumptions affect the effort
    - - How does fallacies influence how we assume something to be stronger than the order
      - In what way do biases cause us to label things as the strongest
      - Does the historical development of natural sciences create bias regarding new evidence?
  - - - How do AOKS depend on evidence
      - Does evidence deteriorate over time
        
        EH Carr " The facts of history never come to us pure since they do not and cannot exist in a pure for; they are always refracted through the mind of the reorder.[...] our first concern should be with facts which [the work of history] contains but with the historian who wrote it. Study the historian before you begin to study the facts
        
        Does prior knowledge regarding historians influence the assumptions made regarding recent evidence discovered
      - Now Vs Then: Has the improvements in technology and its accuracy made us believe newer evidence is better than old evidence