Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Unpacking
PT : are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence…
Unpacking
PT : are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.
-
most recent evidence
-
-
-
to what extent we know that the evidence is recent evidence instead of past evidence that arise back
-
how does we justify it was recent findings - is it by the founder or by the date noted or technology used or people claims ( what evidence we have that this knowledge is current evidence )
what recent is recent ( is it now aka current year or the year of another finding found on the same topic
e.g : plasma membrane structure ( does fluid mosaic model by singer-Nicholson consider as recent evidence after he falsify the Davon Danielle model)
inevitably the strongest
how we define strongest
strongest = most accurate
strongest = more reliable
strongest = less error
strongest = most relevance
strongest = accept by other expert
-
-
or strongest define by how less error and limitation ( the use of better technology) use to prove the claims or prove the knowledge now
-
-
is there evidence that this knowledge use by people and othe expert belive is as truth right after its found
-
-
-
-
EVIDENCE
evidence can be from a completely new evidence or the evidence that falsify/ overlap over the past evidence
-
-
-
-
ASSUME
-
-
-
-
-
can the assumption be made before and taken by other to claim back ( asumption has existed but ignore then people)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-