Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with references to two areas…
-
KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK
scope
-
in what kind of knowledge does it require to have custodian, is it all or some ?
if yes, how do we differentiate whether a knowledge requires a custodian or not ?
-
perspective
-
in what perspective, e.g cultural and educational background ?
-
-
-
-
-
if there is, does everyone needs to play a part, or a special role needs (custodian) to be appointed ?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
= studies the philosophical, biological, social, and cultural aspects of human life.
- Do we rely on traditions for the preservation of cultural knowledge ?
- Does the ongoing traditions cancels out the need for custodians of knowledge ?
RLE :
a. The need of chief and head of village in an indigenous community. The chief functions as the knower who preserves their knowledge safely.
b. As tradition is still integrated, playing a huge role in our life, some may consider that its more than enough for it to help us spread the knowledge and increase its longetivity and span.
= past incidents, mostly global scale or have a big impact towards a community.
- Will there be bias in preserving knowledge if a custodian system is structured by historians ?
- Why does past knowledge needs to be preserved by historians ?
RLE :
a. Custodians are also the ones that keep artifacts and historical items safe and preserve them. In this context, the need of custodians are necessary to ensure they are safely guarded.
b. Although, diverse contradicting may exists as most evidence are just inconclusive evidence.
-
- To what extent is custodians limited to only certain AOK ?
- Is every method of preserving the knowledge possible ?
-