Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in…

- - - - Excessively
      - More than is normal, necessary, or reasonable
    - - Greatly admired; renowned
    - - Subjectivity in arts is treated as more significant than is deserved
  - - - Not right or does not involve equal treatment
      - with unfairness, in a manner that is not in accordance with the principles of equality and justice
      - Marked by injustice, partiality, or deception
      - Favoritism; self-interest; bias; deception
    - - Declared to be reprehensible, wrong, or evil
      - Unfavourable or adverse judgement
      - oficially declared unfit for use
      - Stronly disapprove
    - - subjectivity in history is strongly disapprove with unequal treatment
- - - - A broad and complex topic
      - Foremd by inner beliefs, desires, prolictives, perceptions, and external societal and cultural influences
  - - - Is the objectivity in arts is highly condemned for it not being subjective?
  - - - what counts as a fact in history?
  - - - can the historian be free of bias in the selection and interpretation of material?
        
        is it inevitable that historians will be affected by their own cultural context?
        
        how can we gauge the extent to which history is being told from a cultural or national perspective?
- - - - Many history can be interpreted differently
    - - Historians write and interpret on behalf of their perspective and not on the truth
      - Limited or incomplete primary sources
      - Historical events are built on subjectivity
  - - - due to the nature of history
    - - this info may be subjective content, its existence as evidence is an objective fact
- - - - the artists' knowledge to understand the work
      - the knowledge required by the audience
      - the knowledge that the artwork gives us about the world
        
        skilful audience member can imbue an artwork with meaning
        
        it might not carry any meaning at all
        
        the meaning of an artwork is often strongly tied to its location in the continuum of art history
        
        a sense of history is crucial in understanding and valuing art
    - - artwork expected to 'work' in some sense
      - need to master a set of technical skills
    - - not the artist who decide this
      - decided by a particular group of people
        
        art world; gallery curators, private collectors, art historians, art critics, and some infleuntial artists
      - one view of value in arts: institutional view
  - - - many disciplines labour under the challenges of dealing with indirect evidence
    - - every field of knowledge has a history
    - - the traditional boundaries may be overstepped
    - - Historians sometimes misinterpret evidence - they are not justified in asserting the inferences they draw about the past is true
      - an account of a historical subject might be justified and credible while the subject is unbalanced- unfair
      - general description of the past that implies facts which on the available evidence, are known to be false