it is important to remember that analysis of a text involves a close look at the text but us not limited to a discussion of literary features. Authors choices may involve small details such as the use of particular words or be as broad as choice of genre. Analysis of a work should lead to an evaluation. Evalutation can be seen as a discussion of affects that gets at why the question or issue might actually matter in the works at hand . Evaluation can, in this way be seen as a type of evaluative interpretation as opposed to a simple statement of comparison such as paths imagery is more effective that frosts. there are, however candidates who may offer aesthetic evaluation that is more effective that is more effective, that suggests some sense, for example of why this imagery might "work" it is also effective, that suggest some sense for example, of why this imagery might work. It is also important to note that a candidate may never use statements with explicitly evaluative language, but still offer the kind of interpretation that gets at what is at stake in these stylistic and interpretive queries about works.