business ethics

whistle blowing

globalisation

good ethics is good business

corporate social responsibility

kantian view

utilitarian view

kantian view

utilitarian view

concept that corporations should be accountable for impacts they have on all their stakeholders (community + environment)

when an employee discloses unethical or illegal business practices to the employer or public

positive implications

negative implications

loss of job

loss of trust in company from consumers

poor treatment subsequently from managers

Milton Friedman - businesses having 'moral' responsibilities distracts from its core purpose to make money

utilitarian view on business ethics

good view

flawed view

as a teleological ethical theory, utilitarianism ensures that the focus is on achieving the best outcome

act utilitarianism gives flexibility to differing situations - business situations may not be appropriate to have a rule based ethical theory applied

Bentham's hedonist utilitarianism is reflective of the motives of consumers

utilitarianism depersonalises issues (Mill's competent judge) - avoids bias - issues can be looked at objectively

act utilitarianism - time consuming in the fast paced business world - complicated + lengthy

utilitarianism has no concept of rights + doesn't value justice - would allow unethical practices to reach an end

not clear that the objectivity + impartiality utilitarianism promises can be achieved - ideas of pleasure + pain is often subjective

'goods' - too broad - could mean environmental benefits, wage rises + better working conditions - not all can be immediately achieved.

Kantian view on business ethics

good view

flawed view

John Rawls - modern Kantian scholar - equality of opportunity over equity - discerns 2 rules in order for justice to occur

  1. people should have equal access to basic rights + liberties
  1. social + economic inequalities should be arranged so they have the greatest benefit for the disadvantaged (e.g: less tax for the poor)