Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
christina ideas to other faiths - Coggle Diagram
christina ideas to other faiths
chritian thought
may share cultral things from other together eg celebrate divali
live with other religons in society
rligions have differeing beliefes and opions
may believe both set of beleifes are tur or theres is superior
claims of religion have been subject to reaon eg nml
auinas = chrirtianity is whply reasonable
reloigions have conflicting views
humans hava strong need for pschological certainty
religions = absoute beleifes and moral principles
rise in funcermentalism - litteral acceptance of religions
absoulote convition = sucicide bomber/ marter
no probobility or might
multifaith world dielmma
absoulte certainty of religion = cant accept other religons
no relgions beliefe = religous is incorrect
would one be pre[ared for there faith to be scuritinised
could a athiest concider the idea odf religion as reasonable
differing religions
religions have sources of authority and experience
each religon is self validating
should reason take prioirtiy
compeating cliams
none are compatible withoutlosing some ke beleifes
exclusivism = only ones own religon is absoultly true
evangalists
goal of human life = salvation from sin
go to heaven
need perosnal relationship with jesus
saves prople who would otherwise not be saved
convert people for postive reaons
some beleifes = mutually excluisve
eg jesusu is the son of god making christianity and islam incompatable
muslim = god had no son
john 14:6
jesus answerred i am the way the truth and the life no one comes to the farther accept rheough me
used by christina with exlusive view
explicit faith is needed for salvation
only other situtuation = child dies or when one is unaware of god
makes evalangalsim a priority
bible is literal world of god
traditional view of catholic trustch
extra nulla salus = no salvation for those outside of the roman catholic church
views have been modified but not eliminated
all religon are juded salvation of faith to jesus
ones relationship with chirts is linked to salvation
CRITISMS
god is free to do what he choses - illogical to say he cannot act through other relgions or non
limits god forgivness and salvation
limits god to specific interpration of the bible
deends heavily on on interpratation but tect develop and may need to be revived or trabslated wrong
singlure verse cannot fully justify exclusibism
inclusivism = other relgions may have asoects of truth or are similar to ones own beleifes
god may chose to forgive any who chose to live a good life nomatter what faith
beleive own religion = truth more compeate then others
accept other religion have elemts of truth
closed inclusivism
one specific relio = all truth but others have some too
open inclusivism
one religon has the bst grasp but not all the truth
acts 10:34-35
i now realsise how true it is that god does not show favourtism but accepts from every nation the ones that fear him and does what is right
lukes and acts followed a inclusive view
gentiles where included into juesus love and teaching
balance of inclusivism and exxlusivism
just assumptio and interpration of the bible
perosnal choice
jeus helped outcasts
range of jesus actions showed inclusivism
need to concider all teatching and scripytes
all relgion
so amny they are ineffective ?
all have the ame respect in god eyes wether they worship or not?
barth = opposed the liberal approach he placed all relgion into the single judgement of jesus
karl rahner
anounomous chrisyians = people who dont worship are srill capable of experincing grace and salvation
dont need to conciously become chrisyian to experience him
can be saved through works rather then faith
removes confronation of faith
all have common quest
view is critised by fundermenatlist
may be seen as patronising to other faith