key issue 3

functionalism

marxism

neo-marxism & radical criminology

interactionism

realism

new right

subculturalism

feminism

durkheim

  • crime is inevitable & functional, universal & normal, but only a certain optimal amount, otherwise anomie will occur
  • boundary maintenance = crime shows members of society where the boundaries of right & wrong are through punishing those who go beyond the boundaries
  • social solidarity = crime can create cohesion in society through through shared outrage from individuals

merton

  • strain theory = clear, culturally-defined goals with clear means to achieve them, but not everyone has the same opportunity to share these goals & values
  • anomie = disconjunction between goals & means
  • eg = conformists have goals and means, yet innovators have goals but no means eg drug dealer

hirschi

  • bonds of attachment theory
  • we need to understand what forces maintain conformity for most people in society
  • 4 bonds that help bind society together: attachment, commitment, involvement & belief

matza

  • young people 'drift' in & out of deviance as part of the normal process of growing up
  • use techniques of neutralisation to justify their deviant behaviour
  • eg = denial of responsibility

capitalism causes crime

  • generates a selfish mindset (money buys happiness) so products become goal in our lives but not everyone can afford this so turn to crime
  • bonger = capitalism encourages greed, thus encouraging criminal behaviour

crime is a reaction to exploitation

  • hebdige = w/c crime is a sign of resistance & rebellion, eg youth subcultures

law is biased in favour of the rich

  • bourgeoisie criminalise acts that threaten their interests
  • hold all power over the state & law making
  • chambliss = 1349 vagrancy laws were said to be good for he public, but actually just increased profits

law is selectively enforced

  • certain types of crime are more rigourousluy dealt with than others
  • sutherland = those who committed white-collar crime got away with it

chivalry thesis

  • pollack = men are taught to be chivalrous towards women
  • women are protected by this chivalrous factor

lack of opportunities

  • women traditionally defined to the domestic sphere, so had less opportunity to indulge in criminal behaviour
  • however, is argued to be changing
  • wilkinson = women are just as likely as men to engage in white-collar crime

sex-role theory

  • sutherland = children are socialised into clear gender roles which influence their potential for criminal behaviour
  • female roles = caring, passivity & domesticity
  • therefore, lack the values associated with criminal behaviour

social control

  • heidensohn = women are more closely controlled & supervised in society than males are
  • carlen = crimes more likely to be committed by women who hadn't been offered class' gender deals

miller

  • saw the w/c socialised into deviant subcultural values known as 'focal concerns'
  • trouble, toughness, excitement, smartness, fatalism, autonomy

cohen

  • youths rebound from conventional failure (eg school) & develop status frustration
  • therefore, they choose a delinquent subculture to gain this status, eg anti-school subculture

cloward & ohlin

  • lower w/c delinquents share their own deviant subcultural values
  • 3 types of delinquent subcultures = criminal, conflict & retreatist
  • eg = conflict is violence to defend territory

becker

  • acts are only deviant because society deems them to be
  • a label applies to those who are caught which leads to a deviant career (opportunities are blocked, so leads to further deviance)
  • can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy & label can become their master status

lemert

  • societal reaction to behaviour is more significant than the behaviour itself
  • primary deviance = deviant acts that aren't publicly labelled
  • if behaviour is repetitive & highly visible, it will begin to affect the individual's self-concept

goffman

  • when a label becomes a master status, it changes & replaces their identity
  • proved this with prison inmates - they fear being released & losing their new identity, so often go to great lengths to remain inside
  • therefore, some institutions reinforce rather than reduce deviance

chambliss

  • the same criminal/deviant act can be committed but can be responded to in different ways
  • his study of saints & roughnecks proved this - saints were excused, but roughnecks seen as bad & prosecuted more often
  • labels lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy

left

young

  • society excludes increasing numbers of people & there's a link between social exclusion & crime
  • economic exclusion leads to social exclusion & in turn crime
  • creates a culture of fear, which can lead to scapegoating

lea & young = 3 key factors which influence crime levels

  • relative deprivation = feel this when comparing themselves to other members of society
  • marginalisation = outside groups have minimal representation in society
  • subcultures = provides forms of relief from relative deprivation

right

matthews & young = 'square of crime' -
crime arises at an intersection - must supplement with role of public opinion for example

wilson = rational choice theory

  • after weighing up risks & rewards, people make a rational choice to commit crime
  • eg = covid regulations with fine of £50-100 - low risk, high reward

wilson & kellings = broken windows theory

  • once communal barriers have broken down, deviance can happen anywhere
  • maintaining appearance of an area is key to upholding law & order

wilson & hernstein

  • some people are biologically predisposed to crime
  • these 'criminal traits' will be heightened if they lack proper socialisation, eg single parent families

hall et al = policing the crisis

  • economic crisis led to government creating a media outrage on mugging to divert attention from themselves
  • black afro-carribean males = scapegoats
  • real causes of crime were never addressed

centre for contemporary cultural studies

  • analysed deviant youth subcultures in 70s/80s
  • attitudes of each subculture were seen as expressions of resistance in a capitalist society & the class inequalities affecting their lives

taylor, walton & young = 'radical theory of crime'

  • inequalities lie at the root of crime
  • crimes are often deliberate & conscious acts with political motives

murray

  • underclass exists who lack socialisation into norms & values by predominantly lone parents
  • this leads them to crime & deviance
  • shadow economies = young males lack motivation provided by father figures, so look to earn through these, eg drug dealing

murray & herrnstein = correlation between low iq and criminality - people with low iq are more likely to commit crime