Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
UNPACKING PT 3:
Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are…
UNPACKING PT 3:
Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to human science and history
- Bring fresh ideas
- Choose example from home culture & country
- Talk abt why it was slowly adopted
- specific reasons
- identify issues that cause it
- Write a comparison paragraph
- Write conclusion
- in depth in lessons and takeaways
- why people, learners, experts rarely accept new ideas
Definition:
"Fresh": This word denotes new, original, or recently created ideas or concepts. Fresh ideas are innovative and have not been widely explored or adopted before.
"Ideas": This word refers to concepts, thoughts, or innovations that can lead to new knowledge or ways of understanding the world.
Ideas - an understanding, thought, or picture in your mind
"Exciting": This word conveys a sense of enthusiasm, interest, or stimulation. In the context of the title, it suggests that fresh ideas generate excitement and enthusiasm.
Exciting - to make someone have strong feelings of happiness and enthusiasm
"Slow": This word describes the speed or rate at which something happens. In this context, it highlights the resistance or reluctance of areas of knowledge to embrace fresh ideas.
"Nothing": This word implies the absence of anything. In the context of the title, it suggests that there is nothing more exciting than fresh ideas, emphasizing the value and novelty of innovative thinking.
"Adopt": This word means to take on, accept, or integrate new ideas or practices into an existing system or framework. It implies a deliberate choice to incorporate fresh ideas.
Adopt - to accept or start to use something new
Inquiries:
-
-
-
-
Validation and Evidence:
What role does the availability of empirical evidence and rigorous validation play in the acceptance of fresh ideas?
-
-
-
-
-
AOKs
Human Science
- Interdisciplinary Barriers
Fresh ideas in human science frequently draw from various disciplines. However, interdisciplinary collaboration and communication can be challenging, as researchers from different fields may use different methodologies, terminologies, and paradigms. Bridging these gaps and promoting cross-disciplinary acceptance of new ideas can be a slow process.
Human science research often involves human subjects, raising ethical concerns. The adoption of fresh ideas may be slowed by the need to ensure that new approaches comply with ethical standards and protect the rights and well-being of participants. Ethical approval processes can be time-consuming.
Academic and research institutions in human science often have established paradigms and traditions that can resist change. Scholars, journals, and universities may be hesitant to embrace new theories or methodologies, especially if they challenge established norms, which can lead to a conservative approach to knowledge adoption.
- Peer Review and Publication Process
Fresh ideas in human science must often undergo a rigorous peer-review process before they can be published in reputable journals. This process can be slow and competitive, with reviewers and journal editors ensuring the validity and reliability of new findings.
- Complexity of Human Behavior
Human science deals with understanding complex aspects of human behavior, cognition, and culture. Fresh ideas in this domain may challenge existing theories, and verifying their effectiveness often requires extensive research and empirical evidence. Consequently, it can take time to accumulate the necessary data and conduct rigorous studies, contributing to the slow adoption of fresh ideas.
- Resistance to Paradigm Shifts
Fresh ideas in human science may challenge existing paradigms and worldviews. Such paradigm shifts can be met with resistance from scholars and practitioners who have invested time and effort in the established way of thinking. This resistance can slow down the adoption of fresh ideas.
Conducting research to validate fresh ideas in human science often requires substantial resources, including funding, equipment, and qualified personnel. Institutions and researchers with limited resources may struggle to quickly embrace and investigate innovative concepts.
Even when fresh ideas gain acceptance in academic circles, their adoption in real-world practice can be slow. Policymakers, clinicians, and practitioners may be cautious about implementing new approaches in fields like psychology or social work, as they deal with individuals' well-being and public policies, where mistakes can have serious consequences.
Arts
- Avant-Garde vs. Mainstream
In the arts, there is often a divide between avant-garde or experimental art and mainstream or traditional art. Fresh ideas frequently emerge from the avant-garde, and it can take time for these ideas to filter into the mainstream. The avant-garde is often met with skepticism, but its influence can eventually reshape the artistic landscape.
- Financial and Commercial Considerations
The arts, like many fields, are subject to market forces. Commercial success is often linked to established forms and styles, and artists and institutions may be reluctant to take financial risks by embracing fresh ideas that may not have a guaranteed audience or market.
Art is inherently subjective, and what is considered innovative or fresh varies from person to person. Some may be quick to embrace fresh ideas, while others may be more conservative in their preferences. This subjectivity can create a divide in the art world, making it difficult for new ideas to gain widespread acceptance.
- Cultural and Societal Norms
Fresh ideas in the arts can challenge cultural and societal norms. Art often reflects and critiques society, and ideas that challenge the status quo may face resistance from those who benefit from existing power structures.
Many art forms have rich traditions and histories that are deeply embedded in cultural contexts. Fresh ideas may be seen as challenging or even disrespectful to these traditions, leading to resistance from both artists and audiences who hold these traditions dear. The reverence for the past can slow down the adoption of innovative approaches.
Creating art is a deeply personal and often solitary process. Artists may have their own creative routines and methods, and they may be hesitant to deviate from what works for them. Fresh ideas can disrupt these routines and require artists to step out of their comfort zones.
Time and Recognition
Historically, many groundbreaking artists and ideas were not fully recognized and appreciated in their time. It often took years or even decades for their work to gain recognition and influence future generations.
Critics and Gatekeepers
The arts have critics, curators, and gatekeepers who play a significant role in shaping the reception and dissemination of fresh ideas. Resistance or acceptance from these influential figures can greatly impact the adoption of new artistic concepts.
Educational Institutions
Arts education often emphasizes traditional techniques and established artistic canons. As a result, aspiring artists may not be exposed to fresh ideas or encouraged to explore them. This can lead to a lack of awareness and understanding of innovative approaches.