See (this important case) City of Manila v. Cosmos Bottling Corporation, G.R. No. 196681, June 27, 2018, 868 SCRA 419, 439-449, where the City of Manila assessed Cosmos for the first quarter of 2017 local business taxes and regulatory fees in the total amount of Php1,226,781.05.
Cosmos protested the assessment, arguing that the tax ordinance pursuant to which the City of Manila imposed the said local business taxes and regulatory fees had earlier been declared by the Supreme Court null and void for failure to comply with the required publication for three (3) consecutive days.
Cosmos further argued that the local business tax being collected constitutes double taxation since Cosmos was made liable to pay the business tax twice,
first as a manufacturer under
Section 14 of the ordinance, and then, again, under
Section 21 of the same ordinance.
Pressured to obtain renewal of its mayor’s permit for the year 2007, Cosmos offered to pay only Php 131,994.23, which it believed was the correct computation of its local business tax for the first quarter of 2007.
The City Treasurer, however, rejected the offer and, at the same time, denied Cosmos’s protest in a letter that Cosmos received on February 6, 2007.
This constrained Cosmos to pay the assessment of Php1,226,781.05 on February 13, 2007.
On March 1, 2007, Cosmos filed with the City Treasurer a claim for refund of the amount of Php1,094,786.82 (after deducting the Php131,994.23 which it believed was the only amount of local business tax due from it), raising the same grounds stated in its protest.
On March 8, 2007, or exactly thirty (30) days from its receipt of the denial of its protest, Cosmos filed a complaint with the Regional Trial Court of Manila for the refund or issuance of tax credit certificate in the amount of Php1,094,786.82.
The City of Manila moved to dismiss the complaint filed with the RTC on the ground of lack of jurisdiction since Cosmos’s remedy was to appeal the denial of its protest within 30 days to a court of competent jurisdiction, which Cosmos failed to do, rather than file a claim for tax refund or tax credit of illegally/erroneously paid taxes.
The Regional Trial Court ruled in favor of Cosmos but denied the claim for refund. The Regional Trial Court likewise denied Cosmos’s motion for reconsideration, prompting Cosmos to appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals.
The Court of Tax Appeals in Division ruled in favor of Cosmos’s allegation of double taxation while, at the same, affirming that the increased rates under the ordinances in question had indeed been declared null and void, and that Cosmos’s liability for business taxes for calendar year 2007 must be computed based on the gross sales or receipts for the preceding calendar year 2006, not 2005.
The Court of Tax Appeals in Division thus ordered the City of Manila to refund or issue a tax credit certificate to Cosmos in the claimed amount of Php1,094,786.82.
PROTEST & PAY NOW, ACTION LATER
On appeal, the Supreme Court held that a taxpayer who had protested and paid an assessment is not precluded from later instituting an action for refund or credit.
The taxpayer’s remedies of protesting an assessment and refund of taxes are stated in Sections 195 and 196 of the LGC.
- 1 more item...