SOUL MAKING THEODICY [HICK]
HICK
- Inspired by St Ireneaus who argues humans are created imperfect, but then have to 'rise to perfection' and work towards achieving the 'likeness' of God during their lives on earth
- The world is a place of SOUL MAKING- therefore has to contain a full range of moral and natural evil so humans can develop virtues such as courage, sympathy empathy & compassion
- These second order virtues are the qualities by which we become the 'children of god' Our suffering and response to it makes us virtuous & christ-like
ST AUGUSTINE
- All humans are born sinful(original sin) because they inherit sin from Adam and Eve who ate from tree.
- This explains the cause of evil & suffering we depend on Gods grace to be saved from our sin, not everyone is saved
ST IRENEUS
- humans didn't 'fall' from perfection, God inteltionally created us imperfect
- This is because throughput our lives, we will grow into perfect beings who are capable of entering heaven If we follow Jesus' example
- we develop and grow through soul-making into 'children of God'
- Hick emphasises the idea of God as a father- a father cannot force his children to love him
- instead children love their parents as a free response to their parents care
- parents develop their children character by teaching them how to live responsibly within the world
God set an epistemic distance between himself and humanity - so human cannot know for sure there is a God
-This means having a relationship with God is a choice, reflecting the fact a loving relationship is only authentic and valuable when freely chosen
STRENGTHS
- Epistemic distance can justify any kind of evil by saying its beyond our understanding
- distance between God & humanity means our knowledge is limited
- heaven for all justifies the means
- Its consistent with St Irenaeus' ideas about the purpose of evil ( it has Christian roots)
- he believed the purpose of god creating this world was soul-making for rational moral agents
- we are not created perfectly but in a state of imperfection- humans are a work in progress
- Consistent with evolution and the idea humanity develops over time
- Darwins theory teaches us that humans physically developed over time
- similarly hicks theodicy teaches us that our should develop over time
- it makes sense humans are a 'work in progress'
- idea of universal salvation is compatible with beliefs about Gods omnibenevolence
- Hicks theodicy teaches us that we all ultimately achieve Gods likeness and the perfection necessary to enter heaven
- this is known as 'universalism'- the idea that everybody ultimately will be saved
- this is arguably more benevolent than Augustines soul-deciding theodicy where only few will be saved
- HOWEVER: is it really worth it? why do some people have to face so much suffering than others if we are all going to the same place afterwards anyway?
WEAKNESSES
- This theory doesn't justify pointless suffering in the world
- whilst some may actually help us to grow, there is some suffering that appears completely pointless e.g animal suffering
- HICKS RESPONSE: EPSITEMIC DISTANCE- pontless suffering is needed to maintain epistemic distance between humanity and god
- DZ PHILLIPS: theory doesnt justify the quantity of evil in the world
- does the end really justify the means? you cannot see evil and suffering as instrumental for a greater good
- we shouldn't use other peoples suffering as a means to an end
- we cant justify the existence of horrendous evils by simply stating we need to grow deeply in responding to them
- HICKS RESPONSE: all evils are a matter of degree- if we remove evils like the Holocaust then the next-to-worst evils will seem the very worst
- if humans were made imago dei surely they were made fully perfected rather than simply with this potential
- HICKS RESPONSE: Genesis says we were made in the image and likeness of God
- we were made with this image and then grow into his likeness over time
- were created with potential rather than completion
- The idea of universalism is rejected by some christians-this arguably undermines Hicks theodicy
- According to hicks theodicy, everyone will ultimately be saved.
- This raises questions with some christians: what's the point of Jesus' sacrificial death and resurrection if everybody can become worthy of salvation on their own
- What dies this mean for traditional doctrines of election and judgement- will people who cause suffering be saved?
- what does his mean for the 'sola Christus' principle if were all saved anyway, why go through so much suffering?