Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Punishing vs. Securing Compliance in dealing with White Collar Criminals.
…
Punishing vs. Securing Compliance in dealing with White Collar Criminals.
(1,500 word limit)
Previous Exam Q's
[2021] Some scholars have argued that when dealing with white collar offending it is often more productive to emphasize the long-term partnership between offenders and authorities through a “compliance” approach rather than to seek tough penalties which stigmatize wrong-doers. Compare and contrast these two positions. Which is correct and why?
[2020] The best strategy to ensure white-collar compliance with regulatory and criminal law is to engage offenders in an ongoing relationship with authorities, which avoids stigma and penal penalties. Discuss.
[2017] Describe in some detail the different approaches to managing white-collar reoffending e.g., compliance, shaming, punishment. Which approach seems most effective?
[2016] Punishing white collar offenders with severe penalties and long prison sentences is counterproductive because it generates stigma and antagonism rather than compliance and the acceptance of blame. Discuss
Summing all up:
Which is the best approach to WCC offending and reoffending
a) punishment (stigmatises, antagonises)
b) compliance (partnership of offenders and authorities)
c) shaming
-