Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Should A.I Art be considered “real art”? (No) - Coggle Diagram
Should A.I Art be considered “real art”? (No)
History and Backround
Art is the study of painting sculpting and other making art.
A.I is short for artificial intelligence who can do many things like solving questions generating art and much more
Traditionally making art requires an artist to put hours into just one painting.
Argument #1 How can A.I art interfere with real art?
Real artists spend hours to days on original paintings while A.I can generate one in under 5 minutes
People can quickly take the A.I art and claim its their own
A.I can take inspiration from real panting's that people have made and claim that they generated it
Hook
A.I art is taking away the attention from real artists.
A.I Art isn't real art and this is why.
Thesis Statement
A.I art should not be considered real art because an A.I bot may get more attention then an artists who worked hard on making art this isn't fair to the artist who may have spend days working hard.
Argument #2 Art should be made by real artists and not just A.I.
Artists spend time on their artwork so having someone bring A.I art work wouldn't be fair.
Entering art made by and A.I isn't fair because the art could be a copy or even an inspiration from someone else who worked hard on it.
Art shouldn't be allowed to be excepted because it wont be fair to the other artists who spent time working rather than asking an A.I.
Argument #3 A.I art work and real art work shouldn't be compared.
Real artists spend hours on paintings or drawings while an A.I can generate one with putting no effort in it whatsoever.
A.I can take peoples art work while artists can get inspiration from other artists or even be original.
No matter how good the A.I art work can be it shouldn't be compared to real art work since the A.I may have inspiration from someone.