Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Should we use animals for scientific tests? - Coggle Diagram
Should we use animals for scientific tests?
hook
cry's coming from across the hall
animals loosing there lives from products and medicines
Over thousands of animals getting hurt from animal testing every year
History and background
animal testing started in Moorish Spain
Animal testing was experimental method for testing surgical procedures seeing if it was safe for humans
drug testing using animals became important in the twentieth century
specialized info
Animal testing is a popular thing all over the world
Stopping animal testing saves many animals
argument #1 stopping animal testing saves thousands of animal lives and makes products better for humans to use
breeds wont go endangered
removes life-saving treatments only tested on animals
more safer and natural materials would be used if there was human testing instead
natural drugs and fibre chips
Thesis statement
Animals should not be tested cause it effects so many species in different ways hurting them and giving the animal diseases and infections
Argument #3 human testing has helped saved money and animals
safer products
animal testing can cost up the $32,000 but human testing is 3 times lower then that (up to $11,000 instead)
less waste of time
more efficient
argument #2 It's wasteful of time, money and animals
If animal testing proceeds in the future, they might use taxes or other peoples money to continue testing
animals are hurt for the rest of there lives and the test might fail so it was a waste of using the animal or animals
if the test doesn't go as planned its a waste of money and time