Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Should A.I art be considered "real" art? - Coggle Diagram
Should A.I art be considered "real" art?
Hook
Did you know most that A.I art programs takes art and pictures posted online and mixes it with other art to create what an image?
A.I art can be deciphered to hand drawn art, as if you look closely, the A.I art has several mistakes, such as, missing fingers or
History & Background
One of the first A.I art program is AARON. Created by Harold Cohen, dating back to the 1960's.
A man used A.I art in the Colorado State Fair's art competition, and won 1st place in digital art.
Art was known to be first found in ancient Egypt, and since then has gotten more popular
Thesis
A.I art should not be considered real art because it takes away the drawing and learning part of art that takes work .and effort, as well as that, it replicates art posted online without the consent of the artist.
Argument #1: It takes away the joy some people get when creating art on their own.
Eliminates creativity
Creating art can bring people happiness
Art takes a long time, and when you share it to the public it can get stolen by A.I
Argument #2: There isn't as much emotion and work from A.I art.
You can see more effort in hand drawn art.
It doesn't reflect the intention of feelings of a person.
It only takes a few searches in the program, ignoring the time artists spent perfecting their art.
Argument #3: It takes photos and art from the internet and replicates it.
Most owners of the art are not consented that their art is being used for A.I
Many artists who draw as a job need money to get food and basic necessities, and it's being harder when their art is being stolen.
Artists may not be able to protect their art for being used in A.I, since most copyright doesn't protect them.
Specialized Info
A.I art companies can charge money for something that is copyrighted and doesn't belong to them.
A.I art is taking and plagiarizing images