Should A.I art be considered "real" art?
Hook
History & Background
Thesis
Did you know most that A.I art programs takes art and pictures posted online and mixes it with other art to create what an image?
A.I art can be deciphered to hand drawn art, as if you look closely, the A.I art has several mistakes, such as, missing fingers or
Argument #1: It takes away the joy some people get when creating art on their own.
Argument #2: There isn't as much emotion and work from A.I art.
One of the first A.I art program is AARON. Created by Harold Cohen, dating back to the 1960's.
A.I art should not be considered real art because it takes away the drawing and learning part of art that takes work .and effort, as well as that, it replicates art posted online without the consent of the artist.
A man used A.I art in the Colorado State Fair's art competition, and won 1st place in digital art.
You can see more effort in hand drawn art.
Art was known to be first found in ancient Egypt, and since then has gotten more popular
It doesn't reflect the intention of feelings of a person.
Argument #3: It takes photos and art from the internet and replicates it.
Eliminates creativity
Most owners of the art are not consented that their art is being used for A.I
Many artists who draw as a job need money to get food and basic necessities, and it's being harder when their art is being stolen.
Creating art can bring people happiness
Artists may not be able to protect their art for being used in A.I, since most copyright doesn't protect them.
It only takes a few searches in the program, ignoring the time artists spent perfecting their art.
Art takes a long time, and when you share it to the public it can get stolen by A.I
Specialized Info
A.I art companies can charge money for something that is copyrighted and doesn't belong to them.
A.I art is taking and plagiarizing images