Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Quality Management - Coggle Diagram
Quality Management
-
Conformance
-
Step 2
This involves taking a very general quality characteristic, such as appearance, and breaking it down, as far as one can, into its constitute elements
Appearance is difficult to measure as such, but color match, surface finish, and number of visible scratches are all capable of being described in a more objective manner
Other quality characteristics, such as the courtesy of airline staff, may pose more difficult to measure as it has no objective qualified measure
Measures used
Variable measures are those that can be measured on a continuously variable scale (for example, length, diameter, weight, or time)
Attributes are those that are assessed by judgement and are dichotomous (that is, they have two states such as right or wrong, works or does not work, looks ok or not ok)
Step 3
The quality standard is that level of quality that defines the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable
Such standards may well be constrained by operational factors, such as the state of technology in the factory, and the cost limits of making the product
At the same time, however, they need to be appropriate to the expectations of customers, but quality judgments can be difficult
Step 4
After setting up appropriate standards, the operation will then need to check that the products or services confirm to those standards, doing things right, first time, every time
Decisions
- Where in the operation should they check that I is conforming to standards?
- Should they check every service or product or take a sample?
- How should the checks be performed?
-
Steps 5 & 6
Total Quality Management
This can be viewed as a logical extension of the way in which quality-related practice has progressed, as shown below
It is an effective system for integrating the quality development, quality maintenance, and quality improvement efforts of the various groups in an organisation so as to enable production and service at the most economical levels which allow for full customer satisfaction
It is best thought of as a philosophy of how to approach quality improvement with the philosophy, above everything, stressing the total of TQM
Aspects
The Quality Control (QC) concept developed a more systematic approach to not only detecting but also treating quality problems
Quality Assurance (QA) winded the responsibility for quality to include functions other than direct operations
-
Important factors
-
-
-
Examining all costs that are related to quality, especially failure costs, and getting things right first time
-
-
TQM
-
-
-
-
In traditional quality management, it was assumed that failure costs reduce as the money spent on appraisal and prevention increases
Furthermore, it was assumed that there is an optimum amount of quality effort to be applied in any situation, which minimise the total costs of quality
The argument is that there must be a point beyond which diminishing returns set in – this is the cost of improving quality gets larger than the benefits that it brings
-
TQM quality-cost model
TQM rejects the optimum-quality level concept and strives to reduce all known and unknown failure costs by preventing errors and failure taking place
Rather than looking for optimum levels of quality effort, TQM stresses the relative balance between different types of quality costs
Of the four cost categories, two (costs of prevention and costs of appraisal) are open to managerial influence, while the other two (internal costs failure and external costs of failure) show the consequences of changes in the first two
Rather than placing most emphasis on appraisal (so that bad products and services don’t get through to the customer), TQM emphasises prevention (to stop errors happening in the first place)
This change in the view of quality costs has come about with a movement from an inspect-in (appraisal-driven) approach to a design-in (getting it right first time) approach
The ISO 9000 approach
The ISO 9000 series is a family of standards compiled by the International Organisation of Standardisation (ISO), which is the world’s largest developer and publisher of international standards, based on Geneva, Switzerland
The ISO illustrates the benefits of the standard as follows: Without satisfied customers, an organisation is in peril
The ISO 9001:2008 standard provides a tried-and-tested framework for taking a systematic approach to managing the organisation’s processes so that they consistently turn out products that satisfies customers’ expectations
In addition, it is also seen as providing benefits both to the organisation adopting it (because it gives them detailed guidance on how to design their control procedures) and especially to customers (who have the assurance of knowing that the products and services they purchase are produced by an operation working to a defined standard)
Furthermore, it may also provide a useful discipline to stick to sensible, process-orientated procedures, which lead to error reduction, reduced customer complaints and reduced costs of quality, and may even identify existing procedures that are not necessary and can be eliminated
-
Gap model
Gap 1: The customer’s specification-operation’s specification gap – Perceived quality could be poor because there may be a mismatch between the organisation’s own internal quality specification and the specification that is expected by the customer
Gap 2: The concept-specification gap – Perceived quality could be poor because there is a mismatch between the service or product concept and the way the organisation has specified quality internally
Gap 3: The quality specification-actual quality gap – Perceived quality could be poor because there is a mismatch between actual quality and the internal quality specification (often called conformance to specification)
Gap 4: The actual quality-communication image gap – Perceived quality could be poor because there is a gap between the organisation’s external communications or market image and the actual quality delivered to the customer. This may be because the marketing functions has set unachievable expectations, or because operations is not capable of the level of quality expected by the customer
-
-
Service-level agreement
These are the formal definition of the dimensions of service and the relationship between two parts of an organisation
-
-