Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Major Construction Fit Out (Guidance) M'App [6. Current examples of…
Major Construction Fit Out (Guidance) M'App
[6. Current examples of major fit out routes]
2. Procurement Options
[1. Traditional]
[2. Design and Build]
[3. Construction Management]
[4. "Managed package solutions"]
4. Two Stage Tendering
3. Process
[1. Design to Stage 3]
[2. Tender for Stage 1 contractor]
[3. But negotiate terms for Stage 1 and Stage 2 with the Stage 1 contractor(s)]
[4. Select contractor for Stage 1]
[5. Select contractor for Stage 2]
1. Stage 1
[1. RIBA Stage 3 to RIBA Stage 4]
2. Stage 2
[1. RIBA Stage 4 onwards]
4. Advantages
[2. Can start works earlier]
[3. Employer can select subcontractors]
1. Close collaboration with contractor on design
[1. Helps conceptual design]
[2. Helps execution of design]
5. Disadvantages
[1. Lack of competition]
[2. Contractors can control elements of the price]
[3. Stage 2 risk]
5. Fit Out Contractors
1. Tier One
[1. Overbury]
[2. ISG]
[3. MACE]
2. Others
[1. Structuretone]
[2. Lendlease]
3. Procurement considerations
[4. Construction Management]
1. Design and Build
1. Advantages
[1. Single point responsibility for design]
[2. More time certainty]
[3. More cost certainty]
2. Disadvantages
[1. Less control over the design and quality]
[2. Employers requirements should be developed in detail]
[3. Changes can be expensive]
[4. Changes can result in significant delays]
2. Traditional
1. Advantages
[1. Good certainty on time]
[2. Good certainty on costs]
[3. Control over design and quality]
2. Disadvantages
[1. No single point responsibility]
[2. Time and cost interface risk]
[3. Lead in time to develop design]
3. Mitigations
1. Current Market Issues
[1. Costs are high]
[2. Contractors have lots of options]
[3. Not much choice available if you are doing a big fit out i.e. over 60,000 sq ft]