Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Response Paper 3, scenario - Coggle Diagram

- - - - in this paper, I will try to understand Walk and why loiter loitering sessions as SCENARIOS
        
        why will i try to understand them as scenarios? bc of the reasons that taylor gives - writing is overprivileged as a meaning making paradigm and it tends to gloss over the embodied knowledges that have been transmitted through the years
        this section is basically going to be a summary of Taylor's argument about why it is important to legitimise the repertoire as a means of academic understanding etc etc etc — so ghusao the meat of your taylor summary here
- - - - "The avant-garde's emphasis on originality, ephemerality, and new-ness hides multiple rich and long traditions of performance practice"
      - "The rift, I submit, does not lie between the written and spoken word, but between the 'archive' of supposedly enduring materials (i.e., texts, documents, buildings, bones) and the more ephemeral 'repertoire' of embodied practice/knowledge (i.e., spoken language, dance, sports, ritual)."
      - The charge against the 'ephemeral' and 'constructed' and 'visual' nature of performance has tied into the discourse on idolatry.
      - The temporary nature of the ixiptlatl should not, as the Spaniards would suggest, connote the 'ephemeral' and disappearing nature of the phenomena. The constant making and unmaking points to the active role of human beings in promoting the regenerative quality of the universe, of life, of performance-all in a constant state of again-ness.