Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Education - Coggle Diagram
Education
Class differences in achievement, internal factors
Labelling
Criticisms:
- Labelling theory has been accused of determinism:
- It assumes that pupils who are labelled have no choice but to fulfil the prophecy and will inevitably fail.
- However, studies such as Fuller's (1984) show that this isnt always true.
- Marxists also criticise labelling theory for ignoring the wider structures of power within which labelling takes place.
- Labelling theory tends to blame teachers for labelling pupils, but fails to explain why they do so.
- Marxists argue that labels aren't merely the result of teachers' individual prejudices, but stem from the fact that teachers work in a system that reproduces class divisions.
- Becker (1971) carried out a study of labelling, based on interviews with 60 Chicago high school teachers, he found that they judged pupils according to how closely they fitted an image of the 'ideal pupil'.
- Teachers saw children from middle-class backgrounds as the closest to the ideal, and working-class children as furthest away from it as they regarded them as badly behaved.
- Hempel-Jorgenson (2009) found that the notion of the ideal pupil varies according to the social class makeup of the school.
- In a largely working-class primary school, the ideal pupil was defined as quiet, passive and obedient.
- In the mainly middle-class primary school the ideal pupl was defined in terms of personality and academic ability, rather than on behaviour.
Labelling in secondary schools:
- Dunne and Gazeley (2008) argue that 'schools persistently produce working-class underachievement' because of the labels and assumptions of teachers.
- From interviews in 9 English state secondary schools, they found that teachers 'normalised' the underachievement of working-class pupils, seemed unconcerned by it and felt that they could do little/ nothing about it.
- A major reason for this was the teachers' belief in the role of pupils' home backgrounds, labelling working-class parents as uninterested.
- This led to class differences in how teachers dealt with pupils they percieved as underachieving.
Labelling in primary schools:
- Rist's (1970) performed a study of an American kindergarten. He found that the teacher used infromation about children's home background and sppearance to place them in seperate groups, seating each group at a different table.
- Those the tecaher decided were fast learners, she labelled 'tigers', they tedned to be middle class, anmd were setaing right by her and shown the most encouragement.
- The other 2 'cardinals' and 'clowns' were setaing furhter away, they were more likely to be working-class and shwon little encouragement.
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Teachers' expectations:
- Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968), show the SFP at work as a primary school.
- They gave the school a standard IQ test, telling them it was to identify students who would 'spurt' ahead. They tested all pupils, but picked a random 20% of them and told the school these students were 'spurters'.
- When they returned to school, almost half of those identified as spurters has made significant progress.
- They suggested that teachers' beliefs about the pupils had been influenced by the supposed test results. Teachers conveyed these beliefs to the pupils in the way they interacted with them.
- The SFP can also produce under-achievement. If teachers have low expectations of certain children and communicate these expectations in their interaction, these children may develop a negative self-concept.
Streaming
- Streaming is the separation of children into different ability groups or classes
- Studies show that the self-fulfilling prophecy is particularly likely to occur when children are streamed
Becker:
- Teachers don’t see working class pupils as ideal students, they see them as lacking ability and having low expectations of themselves
- Therefore the teachers place the students in lower streams, once these children are streamed it is difficult to move to a higher stream
- Children in the lower streams “get the message” that their teachers have written them off as ‘no hopers’
- This creates a self-fulling prophecy in which the students have to live up to their teachers’ low expectations by underachieving
- For example, Douglas found that children placed in a low stream at age 8 suffered a decline in their IQ score at age 11
By contrast…
- Middle class pupils tend to benefit from streaming
- They are likely to be placed in higher streams as the teachers bore them as the ideal pupils
- As a result, they develop a more positive self concept
- For example, Douglas found that children put in a higher stream at ages 8 have a higher IQ score at aged 11
Streaming and the A-C economy:
- Gillborn and Yudell show that teachers use stereotypical nations of ability to stream pupils
- Teachers see working-class pupils as having less ability putting them in a lower stream and affecting their GCSE results.
- This denies them the knowledge and opportunities needed to gain good grades and widens the class gap in achievement
- However, the teachers believe that they put you in a set that believes you will do well in
- Publishing league tables create what Gillborn and Yudell call an ‘A-C economy’ - focuses their time and effort and resources on those pupils they see as having potential and so boosts the schools league table position
- The need to gain a good league table position drives educational triage, thus becoming the bases of streaming, which results in lower levels of achievement for working-class pupils.
- Schools operate within a wider education system whose marketisation policies directly affect these micro-level processes to produce class differences in achievement.
Educational triage:
- Gillborn and Yudell call this process educational triage.
- Triage means sorting.
- Triage is usually used in the medical field referring to patients by splitting into 3 categories. The A-C economy produces educational triage:
- Those who will pass and can be left alone
- Those with potential, and will be helped to get a C+
- Hopeless cases, who are doomed to fail.
Pupil subcultures
The variety of pupil responses:
- Woods (1979) arguyes other responses are also possible. These include:
- Ingratiation: being the tecaher's pet.
- Ritualism: going through the motions and staying out of trouble.
- Retreatism: day dreaming and mucking about.
- Rebellion: outright rejection of everything the school stands for.
- Furlong (1984) observes may pupils are not committed permanentyl to any one respone, but may move bwteen responses, acting differenty with different teachers.
The pro-school subculture:
- Pupils placed in high streams tend to remain committed to the values of the school.
- They gain their status in the approved manner, through academic success, their values are those of the school.
The anti-school subculture:
- Those placed in low streams suffer a loss of self-esteem, the school has undermined their self-worth by placimg them in a position of inferior status.
- They look for alternative ways to achieve status, involving inverting the school's values of hard work, obedience, and punctuality.
- Lacey's (1970) concepts of differentiation and polarisarion explains how pupil subcultures develop.
- Differentiation: the process of teachers categorising pupils according to how they percieve their ability, attituide and/or behaviour.
- Polarisation: the process in which pupils respond to streaming by moving towards 1 of the 2 opposite 'poles'.
- In his study of Hightown boys' grammar school, he found that streaming polarised boys into a pro school and anti-school subculture.
Abolishing streaming:
- Ball (1981) found that when the comprehensive school Beachside, abolished banding, the basis for pupils to polarise into subcultures was laregly removed and the influence of the anti-school subculture declined.
- Altough pupil polarisation disappeared, differentiation continued. Tecahers continued to categorise pupils differently.
-
-
Class differences in achievement, external factors
Cultural deprivation
Parents' education:
- Douglas (1964) found that working-class parents placed less value on education.
- Feinstein (2008) reaches similar conclusions, he argues that parents' own education is the most important factor affecting children's achievement.
Use of income:
- Bernstein and Young (1967) found middle-class mothers are more likely to buy educational toys, books and activities that encourage reasoning skills and stimulate intellectual development.
- Working-class homes are more likely to lack these resources.
- Educated parents also have a better understanding of nutrition and its importance on child development and higher income which is used to buy more nutritious food.
Class, income and parental education:
- Feinstein notes that parental education has an influence regardless of class or income.
- Even within a given social class, better-educated parents tend to have children who are more successful at school.
Parenting Style:
- Educated parents' parenting style emphasises consistent discipline and high expectations of their children.
- Less educated parents'[ parenting style is marked by harsh or inconsistent discipline that emphasises 'doing as you're told' and 'behaving yourself'.
Parents' educational behaviours:
- Educated parents are more aware of what is needed to assist their children's educational progress.
- They are also better able to get expert advice on childrearing, more successful in establishing good relationships with teachers and better at guiding their children's interactions with the school.
Working-class subculture:
- Sugarman (1970) argues that the working-class subculture has 4 key features that act as a barrier to educational achievement:
- Fatalism - 'whatever will be will be' and there's nothing that can change it.
- Collectivism - valuing being part of a group more than succeeding as an individual.
- Immediate gratification - seeking pleasure now rather than making sacrifices to get future rewards.
- Present-time orientation - seeing the present as more important than the future.
- Sugarman argues that they stem from the fact that working-class jobs are less secure than middle-class jobs and have no career structure through which individuals can advance.
Compensatory education:
- These programmes aim to tackle the problem of cultural deprivation by providing extra resources to schools and communities in deprived areas.
- One famous example is Operation Head Start in the US. Its aim was 'planned enrichment' or the deprived child's environment to develop skills and instil achievement motivation.
- Sesame Street was initially part of Head Start.
- In Britain, there are Educational Priority Areas (EAPs), Education Action Zones (EAZs) and Sure Start.
The myth of cultural deprivation?
- Keddie (1973) describes cultural deprivation as a 'myth' and sees it as a victim-blaming explanation.
- She dismisses the idea that failure at school can be blamed on a culturally deprived home background, and points out that a child can't be deprived of their own culture. Instead, working-class children are culturally different, not deprived.
- Troyna and Williams (1986) argue that the problem isn't the child's language, but the school's attitude towards it.
- Blackstone ad Mortimore (1994) argue that WC parents attend fewer parents' evenings as they work longer/less regular hours or are put off by the school's middle-class atmosphere.
Language:
- Hubbs-Tait et al (2002) found that cognitive performance improves when parents use language that challenges their children to evaluate their own understanding or abilities.
- Feinstein (2008) found that education parents are more likely to use language in this way, as well as using praise.
- Bereiter and Engelmann (1966) claim that the language used in the lower class phenomenon is deficient, they describe lower-class parents as communicating by gestures, single words or disjointed phrases.
Speech codes:
- Bernstein distinguishes between 2 types of speech codes:
- Restricted code: used by the working class.
- Limited vocab, based on the use of short, unfinished and simple sentences.
- Predictable and may only involve one word or a gesture.
- Context bound, the speaker assumes that the listener shares the same set of experiences.
- Elaborated code: used by the middle class.
- Wider vocab, based on longer and more complex sentences.
- Speech is more varied and communicates abstract ideas.
- Context-free, the speaker doesn't assume the listener shares the same experiences.
-
Material deprivation
Housing:
- Overcrowding can have a direct effect by making it harder for the child to study, as it means less room for educational activities, no where to do homework, disturbed sleep from sharing rooms etc..
- Poor housing can have indirect effects as well. Children in crowded homes run a greater risk of accidents. Cold or damp housing can also cause ill health.
Diet and Health:
- Howard (2001) notes that young people from poorer homes have lower intakes of energy, vitamins and minerals. Poor nutrition affects health, which can result in more absences from school.
- Wilkinson (1996) argues that among 10-year-olds, the lower the social class, the higher the rate of hyperactivity, anxiety and conduct disorders, all of which have a negative effect on education.
- Balnden and Machin (2007) found that children from low-income families were more likely to engage in 'externalising' behaviour, which is likely to disrupt their schooling.
Financial support and the costs of education:
- Tanner et al (2003) found that the cost of items such as transport, books, uniform, etc.. places a heavy burden on poor families. Resulting in poor children having to use hand-me-downs and cheaper equipment which can lead to them being isolated or bullied.
- According to Flaherty, fear of stigmatization may also help to explain why 20% of those eligible for free school meals don't take up their entitlement.
- Smith and Noble (1955) add that poverty acts as a barrier to learning in other ways, such as the inability to afford private schooling or tuition, and poorer quality local schools.
Fear of debt:
- Callender and Jackson (2005) used a questionnaire survey from 2,000 prospective students and found that working-class students are more debt averse, so they saw more costs than benefits in going to university.
- A National Union of Students (2010) online survey of 3,863 university students found that 81% of those from the highest social class received help from home, compared to 43% from the lowest classes.
- Reay (2005) found that working-clas students were more likely to apply to local universities so they could live at home and save costs, but this gave them less opportunity to go to the highest-status universities.
Cultural or material factors?
- While material factrs play a part in achievement the fact some children from poor families do succeed suggetss that material deprivation is only part of the explanation.
- For exmaple, cultural, religious or political values of the family may play a part in creating and sustaining the child's motivation, despite poverty.
-
-
-