Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Agency - Coggle Diagram
Agency
Torts
-
-
3rd Party v. Principal
Agent is employee
-
-
Strict liability doctrine, so no defenses
Respondeat superior: doctrine imposes vicarious liability upon a principal for the torts his agent commits in the scope of employment.
-
Employer is not liable if the employee substantially deviates from the authorized route (frolic) (employee can return to the scope of the employment after a frolic).
Agent performs tasks assigned by the employer or engage in a course of conduct subject to employer's control
-
-
-
Contracts
-
PRINCIPAL V. AGENT: Contract liability based on the terms of their contract. Not a highly likely test area as examiners would have to give you the contract terms, but if they do, simply use your contract mind map.
3RD PARTY V AGENT
-
PARTIALLY DISCLOSED principal: agent is personally liable in contract. 1) When the third party learns the identity of the principal, the third party must elect to go after either the agent or principal, but not both. 2) Breach of warrant of authority: agent acts beyond the agent's authority on behalf of a principal. Agent is personally liable.
-
3RD PARTY V PRINCIPAL
-
Types of authority
-
-
ACTUAL: manifestation of the principal to the agent that the agent acts for the benefit of the principal in a particular way and that the principal agrees to be bound by the agent's actions.
-
IMPLIED: 1) authoirty to accomplish the principal's express request or 2) things the agent believes the principal wishes the agent to do based on the agent's reasonable understanding of the principal's expressed request
Essays involving agency relationship. First question: who is suing who. Second question: is this a tort or contract issue.