Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
The big metaphysics of God Mind map - Coggle Diagram
The big metaphysics of God Mind map
Concept and nature of God
Gods attributes
Omnipotent - All powerful - a) God can do anything logically possible or b) God can do ANYTHING
But God cannot do ANYTHING he couldn't do the logically impossible like create a square circle or a married Bachler because. This is no limitation on Him
God cannot do anything logically possible either - paradox of stone - God cannot make a stone too heavy for Him to lift/lift it
But that's okay because a stone too heavy for an omnipotent being to lift is in itself a logical impossibility - because its a paradox
God cannot be omnibenevolent and omnipotent because an omnipotent being can do anything logically possible but an all loving being is morally perfect so cannot do anything evil or morally wrong - so God cannot be both.
Gods inability to preform evil acts is not because he is not omnipotent it is because He is necessarily perfect - it is not in His nature to preform evil acts - not that He couldn't. Eg. Hercules is omni-strong but cannot lift a stone that is too slippery for him to grip - doesn't mean he's not all strong just .means the rock was too slippery for him to hold - not limitation on his power.
This argument is weak because it still implies there are things God cannot do - sure he's perfect but you can also describe a necessarily perfect being as one who would never commit an immoral act basically meaning they can't.
Omnibenevolence - All loving -
Euthyphro dilemma
God is either morally perfect because he conforms to moral rules perfectly
[This is an issue because it supposes there are immaterial 'moral rules' that exist which God follows meaning there is something above God - also who created these moral rules? - And if God has to follow thesdse rules there is something he cannot do - it not Omnipoetnt
False dilemma - third option - morals come form Gods nature - so God would not command these abhorrent morals as this would be against His nature
But again this means there's something he cannot do - questions his true omnipotence
Or God is morally perfect because He created morality - sets standard for moprality
This is an issue because God could make absurd moral rules like making murder moral which would be rejected by us.
Omniscient - All knowing 'omni' = all 'Scientia' = knowing
Problem: Is this compatible with human freedom - If God knows every choice you are going to make can you have free will? Eg. If God knows you will buy curly fries tomorrow then you will necessarily do this - you have no choice. To preserve God's omniscience is to deny human freedom
Gods omniscience and free will are compatible: But you still have free choice its just that God knows what choice you will make - there is nothing forcing you hand. -This is still a free choice because it was determined by your motives.
But then God's the ultimate cause of evil because if he knows everything and does not stop it (omnipotent) / God knows you will do evil and does not stop it. God is also responsible for our evil motives.
God has predetermined everything
God may have good reasons for evil in the world but we are too limited of beings to comprehend this.
Pretty limited argument because its not falsifiable - you could explain everything with God's plan and it adds nothing meaningful because it cannot be argued against - it is a frustrating position.
True human freedom= making a choice that which under circumstances you could have acted other wise..
PAP is the principle of alternate possibilities
= the opportunity to choose otherwise
Most religions need us to have free will because it is central to most we are held morally responsible for our actions eg heaven or hell
God knows everything that and is happening but God cannot know the future - this is not a limitation on Him it is just that the future does not exist so there is nothing to know.
Divine attributes: Eternal or Everlasting?
If God is Eternal then He transcends time - exists in a realm out of our time - Eternity - like an observer on a hill
But if God is eternal then how does He have interactions with us (how is he immanent) - most theists believe they can have a relationship with God through worship and prayer but if God transcends our time based existence how is he omniscient and able to interact with humans via prayer.
If God is everlasting He had not beginning nor end but exists within our time and existance
If God exists in the present how is he omniscient - how can he know what will happen But then how did God exists in our universe before the universe was created? or time was created?
God was eternal before the beginning of time but everlasting when time began.
Immanence - God making changes within our time, responding to prayer, preforming miracle - just generally interacting with the present.
Ontological arguments
Ontology = study of nature of being (such as God) so arguments supporting Gods existence based on the nature of God's being.
Usually
deductive focusing on logical reasoning (a priori)
based on God's nature
Anslem
1: God by definition is something that than which nothing greater can be conceived. 2. It is greater to exist in understanding and relaity rather than reality alone. 3. Therefore, something than which no.thing greater can be imagined,
God, must exist in the understanding and in reality.
If we think of a perfect meal it might be flavourful, enough to be satisfying but not too filling, our favourite foods - but was would make it better would be if it actually exists. So for it to be the greatest then it has to exist in understanding and reality
God is generally though of a necessarily perfect being as if there was a more perfect being then that would be considered God. So the concept of God is morally perfect, and omni.b.p.s
Valid deductive
Criticism: Guanilo
The perfect island example: by this reasoning would could will anything into existence - it proves too much. you could say: 1; There is an island that than which nothing greater can be conceived. 2. It is better to exist in reality and understanding than understanding alone. 3. Therefore, something than which nothing greater can be imagined, the island must exist.