Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Case, Legal Questions, This decision strongly suggests - Coggle Diagram
Case
4.Failure to Explore Reasonable Alternatives
Dismissal of Team Reduction
Limited Redeployment Efforts
No Retraining Offered
1.Procedural Unfairness
Lack of Genuine Consultation
(Predetermined Decision)
Dismissal of Alternatives
(Lack of Genuine Effort)
2.Weak Business Rationale
Assumptions on Self-Sufficiency
(No Objective Data / No Evidence Provided)
No Evidence of Success
3.Lack of Transparency in Selection Process
No Selection Criteria Provided
No Comparative Role Evaluation
5.Exclusion from the Tribe Operating Model
Agile Coaches Were Not Consulted
Direct Evidence of Exclusion
6.Potential for Unfair Dismissal
Agile Coaching Role Was Absorbed
Evidence of Role Redistribution
Legal Questions
Was the consultation process legally compliant?
(Predetermined Decision)
Was the business case for redundancy properly substantiated? (Subjective Assumptions)
Was there a legal obligation to explore retraining and redeployment?
Does role redistribution constitute unfair dismissal? (AC resps reassigned)
This decision strongly suggests
The redundancy process was predetermined
Failure to explore alternative roles
Reallocation of my responsibilities to others
Potential discrimination in role selection