Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Teaching and learning in BLEs - Coggle Diagram
Teaching and learning in BLEs
Book Chapter about Blended learning
Background definition of Blended learning
2003 Identified as trend
common definitions for BL
Combining Instructional modalities
(so broad)
combining instructional methods
(so broad)
combining online and f2f instruction
it reflects the historical emergence
reflects the combinations of two separated systems
it emphasizes on the role of CM
critical dimensions
Space
Time
Fidelity
Humanness
note that with technological advancement BL is moving toward the area of F2F
Current trends and issues
why we need blended learning?
most common reason that it combine the best of the two
Note that it can combine the worst of the two, can't it ?
mostly people choose BL for three main reasons
improved pedagogy,
most cited reason in literature
examples of IBM, BYU
increased access/flexibility
increased cost effectiveness
what models of blending exist?
Blends on activity level
in which a learning activity combines CM and F2F elements
blends on course level
combines F2F acts and CM acts and used as part of the course
blends on program level
often found in higher education
can be a model the participant can choose a mix between F2F and online courses
can be a model in which F2F and online courses are determined in advance
blends on institutional level
Simply the institution adopts a policy though which they commit to F2F and CM instruction
for institution to be implementing blended learning, it must enable students to benefit for both end of the spectrum
there must be correlation between the two systems and not largely be separated
Categories of Blends
enabling blends
allow for changes on already existing practices to improve them, it can be at both ends of the spectrum.
enhancing blends
a blend in which a radical change would be implemented on the existing pedagogical practices
transforming blends
focuses on issues of access and flexibility
issues and challenges
live interaction
learners prefer F2F components of BL
there a claim the human interaction is not necessary and only used for socialization
role of learner and self regulation
How much guidance must be provided to Ss
BL requires large amount of self discipline on the part of Ss
Models for Support and Training
Increase demand on instructor time
they need more DP for instructors
Equip Ss with needed technological skills
Changing institutional culture to accept BL
Digital divide between individuals and societies
can be seen as directed for privileged
can be seen a chance to provide education for the masses as it cheap and can be easily distributed
Cultural Adaptation
It is an advantage that you can distribute BL to wide audience easily, but there an often need to customization to accommodate differences between different audiences from different contexts
finding balance between innovation and production
direction for the future
BL will be permanent, the question is how to implement it effectively
we must understand strengths and weakness of each to make informed decisions
Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
Definition & Importance
Combines face-to-face (F2F) and online learning
Enhances active learning & student outcomes
Became essential during COVID-19 pandemic
Research Focus
Trends: Growth in blended learning research, mainly in higher education
Geographical Gaps: Most research from developed countries (US, China, Europe)
Challenges: Lack of ICT skills & infrastructure in developing countries
Future Directions: Need for cross-country collaborations
Key Research Questions
Trends: How has research evolved over time?
Subject Areas: What disciplines use BL?
Stakeholders: Who participates in BL (students, teachers, institutions)?
Methods: What research approaches are used?
Design Models: What learning models and technologies are used?
Outcomes & Challenges: What are the benefits and difficulties?
Common Blended Learning Models
Flipped Classroom (Most common)
Station Rotation Model
Flex Model
Self-blend & Enriched Virtual Models
Learning Outcomes
Psychological: Engagement, motivation, satisfaction
Behavioral: Academic performance, skill development
Challenges in BL Implementation
Lack of ICT skills (students & teachers)
Infrastructure issues (internet, devices)
High preparation time for teachers
Student engagement & isolation problems
Future Research & Recommendations
More focus on policy-making for BL adoption
ICT training for teachers & students
Addressing BL challenges in K–12 education
Use of gamification & interactive tools to enhance engagement