Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
TOPIC ONE : PERSPECTIVES ON CRIME, EVALUATION OF LABELLING, EVALUATION OF…
-
EVALUATION OF LABELLING
-
-
-
:check: Society's attempts to control deviance can sometimes backfire and create more deviance rather than less
:red_cross: Akers & Sellers argue deviant act is always more important than the societal reaction to it
:red_cross: Doesn't explain why people offend in the first place, before they are labelled
:red_cross: Too deterministic as it heavily implies that labelling inevitable leads to a deviant career - doesn't account for free will, choice or reduction in deviance due to societal reaction
-
:red_cross: Marxists argue it fails to explain why some groups have more power to get laws passed that are more beneficial to themselves than others
-
-
-
Adaptations
Innovation : factors such as poor qualifications or UE so innovate to achieve goals through crime eg :drug dealer, traffickers, mafia etc
Ritualism : Give up on achieving goals but stick to means eg : teachers have given up caring about student success but continue to work there
Retreatism : strongly internalising both cultural goals and instiutionalised means yet unable to achieve success & give up eg : drug addicts and vagabonds
Rebellion : Rejection of both goals & institutionalised means & replaces it with different means and goals
-
-
-
Eg : in the 18th century - British authorities in the British colonies introduced laws which made it illegal to help a slave escape
-
-
Matza suggests young people commit only occasional delinquent activies as a means of achieving identity, excitement and peer group status for a period of "drift" before reaching full independent adult status. Therefore they have little commitment to delinquent values and give it up as they grow older
-
Hirshi points out underclass and young are less likely to have these 4 controls in their lives therefore more likely to commit crime but as people grow older they acquire controls