Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
qual W4 ethics - Coggle Diagram
qual W4 ethics
-
-
code of ethics
respect
psychologists value the dignity and worth of all persons, with sensitivity to the dynamics of perceived authority or influence over people and with regard to peoples rights
following should be considered: privacy and confidentiality, respect, impact on broader environment, issues of power, consent, self-determination, importance of compassionate care (empathy)
competence
psychologists value the continuing development and maintenance of high standards of competence in their professional work and the importance of working within the recognised limits of their knowledge, skills, training, education and experience
-
responsibility
psychologists value their responsibilities to people, general public, to the profession and science of psych, including the avoidance ofharm and the prevention of misuse of abuse of their contribution to society
should consider:
-
-
respect for the welfare of human, non-humans and the living wolrd
-
integrity
psychologists value honesty, probity, accuracy, clarity and fairness in theri interactions with all people and seek to promote integrity in all facets of their scientific and professional endeavours
should consider:
honesty, opennes and candour
-
-
-
-
-
-
confidentiality
-
-
confidentiality more important when writing up results- a participant may be identifiable from what researchers say
scientific integrity
research should be designed, reviewed and conducted in a way that ensures its quality, integrity and contribution to the development of knowledge
-
honesty, objectivity, integrity
plagiarism
act of passing off somebody elses ideas, thoughts, pictures , theories, words or stories as your own
-
-
risk-benfit
study considered legitimate if the longer term gains outweigh the short term immediate risks to ppts
-
risk analysis should not only consider the interests of these ppts but should consider the interests of any other stakeholders
-
research misconduct
-
defined as- fabrication, falsification or plagiarism in proposing, performing or reviewing research or in reporting research results
-
potential risk to ppts
an important consideration in psychological research, where there is a wide range of potential risk
eg- embarrassment, distress, anxiety; risk to their personal values and beliefs; disclosure of deviant behaviours; identification (research in the workplace)
-
consent
vulnerable populations
children, persons lacking capacity, those in a dependent or unequal relationship, people in care, people with learning difficulties, people in custody
deception
should only take place where it is essential to the aims of the project, where there are no alternatives, where the research objective has strong scientific merit and where there is an appropriate risk management and harm alleviation strategy