Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
quant W4- ethics - Coggle Diagram
quant W4- ethics
research on animals
-
cant give informed consent, debriefed or ask to stop
can be subject to exploitation, extreme levels of pain and mental stress
-
-
Nuremberg code 1947
code made after Nazi doctors would perform unethical experiments of people to protect individuals against unjust experimenting
-
valid/informed consent
agreement to freely and voluntarily participate in research in the full knowledge of the research content and ppt rights
-
right to withdraw
ppts should be made aware of the voluntary nature of research and their rights to withdraw at any time with no consequences
Milgram- used prods to stop ppts from withdrawing, 65% of ppts delivered shocks until the end of the scale (could kill people)
-
confidentiality
information collected about individuals should be appropriately deidentified and it should not be able to be traced, duty to protect ppts from harm
right to privacy
where a procedure is potentially intimate, embarrassing or sensitive ppts should be clearly reminded of the right to withhold info
debriefing
informing ppts about the full untrue or rationale of the study after participation and attempting to reverse any potential negative effects
Zimbardo Standford prison experiment 1971- informed consent gained, researchers conflict of interest, violated ppts right to withdraw, debrief provided a while after
institutional review board (IRB)- every institution that conducts research will have an IRB to protect Ps and researchers