Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
PGR - Coggle Diagram
PGR
PGR Wg issues
argument/claims criticality interpretation Phyo et al 2024, Bommarito 2020, Can & Walker 2014, Tuck 2024
relevance, clarity, in/exclusion of info Bommarito 2020, Can & Walker 2014, East et al 2012, Tuck 2024
language accuracy and appropriateness Basturkmen et al. 2014, East et al 2012, Gupta et al 2022, Odena and Burgess 2017, Phyo et al 2024
coherence/cohesion, flow, organisation, Basturkmen et al. 2014, Can & Walker 2014, East et al 2012, Gupta et al 2022, Tuck 2024
-
PGRs not understanding Ser f Chugh et al 2022, Gupta et al 2022, Odena and Burgess 2017, Stracke Kumar 2020
Supervisor issues
-
-
vague and unclear, not explicit f Chugh et al 2022, Stracke Kumar 2020, Tuck 2024
having to repeat same f because PGRs have ignored it Carter Kumar 2016, Lee Murray 2015, Stracke Kumar 2020
-
Examiner expectations
Mullins & Kiley 2002, Golding et al 2014, Tan 2022, Chetcuti et al 2022
research
-
-
explicit, original contribution to knowledge
-
-
structure
-
-
link betw intro and conc, btw diff parts
language and mechanics
-
-
-
-
cits and refs, quotations
criticality and argument
-
-
-
-
lit - crit used itself and used to support claims, to discuss with own findings
-
institutional support
-
should be part of doctoral curriculum, should be PGR centred and theory informed Celle-Arrango & Avila Reyes 2023, theory informed Sterke-Meyering et al 2014
opportunities to critique peer Wg Cotterall 2011, Lindsay 2015, Lee and Kamler 2008
there should be support Lindsay 2015, Phyo et al 2024