Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person - Coggle Diagram
Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person
Consent to Non-fatal offences
A general defence under the Penal Code
Section 87-92 Penal Code
Definition: A willingness that has been given openly by a person of sound mind in order to form a rational opinion towards the thing that he as consent to (Ratanlal and Dhirajlal's Law of Crimes)
Latin maxim: volenti non fit injuria
When is consent NOT a consent?
Fear or Misconception
Section 90(a):
If the consent is given by a person under:
fear of injury, or
under a misconception of fact, and
if the person doing the act knows, or has reason to believe the same.
Unsoundness of mind or intoxixation
Section 90(b):
if the consent is given by a person who:
from unsoundness of mind or
intoxication
is able to understand the nature and consequene of that to which he gives his consent
Under 12 years old
Section 90(c):
If the consent is given by a person who is under 12 years of age
It is a consent when:
Section 87:
Any person 18 years of age who has given consent to suffer harm (express/implied)
No intention to cause death or grievous hurt
No knowledge that act likely to cause death or grievous hurt
Not an offence if harm caused
Illustration:
A and Z agree to fence with each other for amusement. This agreement implies the consent of each to suffer any harm which, in the course of such fencing, may be caused without foul play, and if A while playing fairly hurts Z, A commits no offence
Is it consent when:
Section 88:
consent given (express/implied)
No intention to cause deth
Act done in good faith for benefit of the victim
No offence committed
Illustration:
A (surgeon) knowing that a particular operation is likely to cause death of Z who suffers under a painful complaint, but not intending to cause Z's death, and intending in good faith, Z's benefit, performs that opeartion on Z, with Z's consent. A has committed no offence
Is it consent when:
Section 89:
Victim ust be below 12 years old/unsound mind
Consent given OR act done by guardian/person having lawful charge
Act done in good faith/benefit of the victim
Illustration:
A (in good faith) for his child's benefit without his child's consent, has his child cut for the stone by a surgeon knowing it to be likley that the operation will cause the child's death, but not intending to cause the child's death. A is withint he exception, is as much as his object was the cure of the child
Exceptions to S89
(a) the intentional
causing of death,
or to the attempting to
cause death
(b) the doing of anything which the person doing it knows to be
likely to cause death
for any purpose other than the preventing of death/grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous disease/infirminity
(c) the voluntary causing of
grievous hurt,
or to the attempting to cause
*grievous hurt
unless it be for the purpose of preventing death or grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous disease/infirminity
(d) the betment of any offence, to be committing of whic offence it would not extend
S47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
AR
Actual Bodily Harm (ABH):
R v Miller (1954): includes hurt/injury calculated to interfere with health/comfort
R v Chan-Fook (1994): 'Actual' means that the injury (although no need to be permanet) should not be so trivial as to be wholly insignificant
Psychological Injury per R v Chan-Fook (1994):
ABH includes psychiatric injury that amounts to medically recognised condition and not just mere emotions
Per Hobhouse LJ: ABH can include psychiatric injury but cannot include emotions like fear/distress/panic or any other state of minds not identifiable as a clinical condition
Facts: D aggressively questioned C he suspected of stealing his fiancee's jewellery. C frightened, escaped through a window but injured himself when he fell to the ground. D charged under S47 but denied striking C.
Held: For liability to incur, its enough that C suffered a hysterical/nervous condition at the time D was convicted at first instance
MR
R v Roberts (1978):
The MR under this section is the same for assault / battery
Facts: D gave a lift in his car to a girl ate at night where he made unwanted sexual advances. C was frightened and jumped out of the car.
Held: D committed AR of S47 by touching C's clothes - sufficient for AR of battery, causing C to suffer ABH
D argued that he lacked the MR as he did not intend to cause ABH but it was rejected as MR for battery is enough by itself
S20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
AR
Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH):
Per DPP v Smith (1961): 'really serious harm'
R v Burstow (1997): serious psychiatric injury can amount to GBH
Inflicting:
R v Wilson (1984): 'inflict' means force being violently applied to the body of the vicim so that he suffers GBH
[S20: GBH must be caused by direct application of force]
Wounding per C (A Minor) v Eisenhower (1984):
Requires breaking of the skin usually leads to bleeding
Inflicting GBH:
Means really serious bodily harm, jury has to decide if the harm is really serious
e.g. injury resulting in permanent disability, broken/displaced limbs or bones, substantial loss of blood needing transfusion, serious psychiatric injury
MR
Maliciously:
Per R v Cunningham: 'maliciously' means intentionally/recklessly
R v Mowatt (1967): It is enough that he should have
foreseen that some physical harm
to some person
S18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
AR
Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH):
Meaning same as S20
R v Ireland and Burstow: inlict per S20 is the same, must refer to causation as well
MR
Intention:
D must've acted maliciously
D who intends to cause GBH obviouly intends to cause harm
Introduction