Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Trauma-Informed Care in Youth Care Organizations - Coggle Diagram
Trauma-Informed Care in Youth Care Organizations
Definition of Trauma-Informed Care
Principles:
Safety: Creating environments where youth feel physically and emotionally safe (Lowenthal, 2020).
Trustworthiness: Fostering relationships built on transparency (Brown et al., 2012).
Collaboration: Promoting shared decision-making among, youth, caregivers, and professionals (Stokes et al., 2024).
Youth in care often face higher rates of trauma, such as abuse or neglect (Hanson & Lang, 2016).
Review of the Literature
Critiques and Gaps
More research is needed to address systemic inequities in implementing TIC (Hanson & Lang, 2016).
Some TIC frameworks lack evidence-based metrics to evaluate success (Hanson & Lang, 2016).
Effective Training Models
"Risking Connection" trauma training model significantly improves staff readiness in congregate care settings (Brown et al., 2012).
City-wide training programs improve organization readiness but reveal challenges in consistent adoption (Damian et al., 2017).
Implementation Success and Challenges
Real-world case study shows gradual success but highlights difficulties in securing stakeholder buy-in (akin et al., 2017).
Perspectives from youth and caregivers emphasize the need for tailored TIC programs (Stokes et. al, 2024).
The Need for TIC in Youth Care
Challenges
Standard practices often fail to consider trauma's long-term effects on behavior and development (Akin et al., 2017).
Systems tend to focus on symptoms rathe than underlying trauma (Lowenthal, 2020).
Gaps in Current Systems
Insufficient training for providers to adopt TIC approaches (Damian et al., 2017).
Lack of integration between youth care systems and trauma services (Akin et al., 2017).
Impact of Untreated Trauma
Leads to poor educational, emotional, and social outcomes for youth (Stokes et al., 2024).
Research Significance
TIC has the potential to significantly improve outcomes for youth in care:
Provides a framework for addressing trauma that underpins behavioral and emotional challenges (Lowenthal, 2020).
Improves relationships between youth, caregivers, and professionals (Stokes et. al, 2024).
Adoption of TIC principles can reshaped child welfare systems, leading to more effective service delivery (Damian et al., 2017).
Research Goals
To incorporate youth and caregiver voices in designing TIC programs.
To identify strategies that enable successful TIC implementation.
Understand organization and provider-level factors that influence TIC adoption.
Research Question
How can trauma-informed care be effectively implemented in youth care settings to address systemic challenges and improve outcomes for children and families?
Quantitative Methods
Data Collection
Collected by a staff member not directly involved in care to reduce bias.
Data collected over one week to minimize disruption to routine.
Surveys administered anonymously during scheduled program activities.
Ethical Considerations
Obtain parental/guardian consent and youth consent before survey distribution.
Ensure responses remain anonymous and no identifying information is collected.
Voluntary participation and open to withdrawal at any time.
Participants included 20-30 youth aged 12-18 in the youth care organization.
Stratified sampling to ensure representation across different program areas and demographics.
Analysis
Summarize responses to each item using descriptive statistics (mean, median standard deviation).
Identify trends or areas needing improvement in trauma-informed care practices.
Statistical software such as SPSS.
Survey Instrument
Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC Scale) Baker et al. (2016)
Assess youth perceptions of trauma-informed care practices within the organization.
Sample items:
"Staff here understand that my behaviors might be ways of coping with difficult experiences."
"I feel safe to express my feelings in this environment."
Results
The results suggest that while some trauma-informed care principles are being effectively implemented (safety), further staff training is necessary to enhance understanding of trauma-related behaviors.
ARTIC scale results show that a majority of youth agreed with statements indicating they felt safe and supported in their care environment.
Application of Results
Address the issue of youth who felt staff did not consistently understand trauma-related behaviors by focusing training on interpreting and responding to trauma-based coping.
Use survey finings to create an annual review process where youth perceptions are collected and compared.
Qualitative Methods
Questions to Ask
Have there been times when you felt unsafe or misunderstood? Can you describe them?
What changes would make you feel more supported here?
What do you feel is most helpful in how staff work with you?
Data Collection
Sessions held privately to ensure confidentiality and comfort.
Scheduled over 2-3 weeks during program hours.
Interviews conducted by a trained staff member or external researcher.
Participants included 6-10 youth aged 12-18 in the youth care organization.
Ethical Considerations
Option to withdraw at any time.
Voluntary participation and confidentiality.
Parental/Guardian consent and youth consent required.
Semi-structured interviews with you in care.
Analysis
Data transcribed and coded for thematic analysis using qualitative software.
Themes grouped under categories such as "safety," 'Staff interactions," and "needs."
Findings shared with participants to ensure their perspectives are accurately represented.
Refined using member checks.
Results
These results highlight the need for consistent trauma training and a deeper understanding of youth experiences to improve the implementation of trauma-informed care.
Youth emphasized importance of feeling heard and respected, with many sharing that staff responsiveness made them feel safer.
Several participants identified gaps in trauma education among staff, noting instances where behaviors were misunderstood as defiance rather than coping mechanisms.
Application of Results
Train staff on reflective listening techniques to ensure youth feel heard and validated.
Establish a youth advisory board to provide direct feedback on the care environment and suggest suggests. Use insights from interviews.