Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
State paranoia and emotional regulation strategies in the general…
State paranoia and emotional regulation strategies in the general population
Introduction
Definition
State Paranoia
contextual fluctuations of paranoia
Trait paranoia
stable characteristics of paranoia
Goal
Aim of my research
compare two well-established paradigms
explore emotional regulation strategies
Global aim
French validation of the Paranoia Checklist
Method
Materials used
Prisonner's Dilemma (No Transgression / Transgression)
Demographic questions
Cyberball Task (Inclusion / Exclusion)
Questions about emotional regulation strategies
Measured variables
Trait paranoia (validated scale)
Emotional regulation strategies
State paranoia (scale in the process of being validated)
Emotions
Participants
Exclusion criteria
No licence or master's degree in Psychology
Not familiar with Cyberball Task
Inclusion criteria
Be between 20 and 40 years old
Hypothesis
If the strategies used are appropriate, then less state paranoia
Similar paranoia between Cyberball Exclusion and Prisoner's Dilemma Transgression
Planned statistical analysis
4-modality linear regression between subjects
Linear regression for 2x2 interaction between subjects
Discussion
Future research
Study with a larger sample
Study on a clinical population
French validation of the Paranoia Checklist
Scientific contributions
Improving therapeutic approaches
Development of interventions focusing on emotional regulation strategies
Understanding state paranoia in the general population
Potential limits
Sample size too small
Correlational studies, so no causality