Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Is our most revered knowledge more fragile than we assume it to be?…

- - - - real life situation
        
        Van Gogh's Starry Night exemplifies the strength of artistic knowledge by illustrating how art conveys universal truths that are independent of personal interpretation. By appealing to universal human experiences that span across all nations and generations, its striking imagery and expressive style arouse feelings of surprise and reflection. The painting's enduring impact comes from its capacity to evoke strong emotions in viewers, such as the conflict between the vastness of the cosmos and human existence. This demonstrates how art may communicate timeless and significant knowledge even when it depends on subjectivity.
      - how
        
        The strength of artistic knowledge is attained as it draws on human experiences that are universal and transcend personal viewpoints. Art may establish links between people and civilizations by tackling timeless topics like love, grief, or beauty, producing knowledge that is profoundly meaningful and long-lasting. In this process, imagination is essential because it allows artists to convey abstract concepts in ways that are meaningful and relevant for centuries to come.
      - counterargument
    - - how
        
        Artistic knowledge is fragile as it relies on ways of knowing that are inherently personal, such as emotion and sense perception. These ways of knowing produce knowledge that is inconsistent and non-universal, as what one person finds profound or meaningful may evoke no response in another. This subjectivity makes the knowledge derived from the arts prone to misunderstanding, reinterpretation, and even dismissal over time.
      - Real life Situation
        
        In his book The Republic, Plato critiques art as being detached from knowledge and truth. He contends that actual objects, which are themselves flawed replicas of ideal Forms, are all that art does. A painting of a chair, for instance, is three steps distant from reality since it just depicts the object's appearance and not its core. Plato also criticizes art because he thinks it might divert people from logical comprehension by appealing to sense perception and emotion. According to Plato, art provides unreliable and untrustworthy information by arousing emotions without providing genuine understanding.
      - argument