Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
TMA03 - Coggle Diagram
TMA03
Part 1:
-
Considering your engagement with key theoretical perspectives, you have been asked to examine the extent to which this setting ‘demonstrates social justice’ and/or ‘equity’ and/or ‘inclusive practice’ in relation to one or more of these key issues:
-
Describe the aspects of the setting that you regard as demonstrating aspects of social justice and/or equity and/or inclusive practice; and then identify aspects which you consider problematic.
-
Problematic
-
-
-
-
Status driven culture of school - no uniform, lack of wealth is evident without status symbols
-
-
Give reasons for your responses and relate them to theoretical ideas and concepts in readings which you have encountered in Sections 2, 3 and 4 of this module, including in readings that you have independently sourced. Refer to specific texts which support your argument.
-
-
-
Part 2
Now imagine that Pierre Bourdieu, Paulo Freire, Amartya Sen and Barbara Rogoff walk into the setting just as you finished your assessment in Part 1. Consider what you and others in your setting might learn from the visit of these theorists and the questions that they might ask.
indicate the type of questions that each theorist might ask about this setting. What different insights would each bring?
-
Freire
The welcoming of inquiry based learning helps build towards conscientionization, but are the people who need it most given access to it?
Sen
Yes you have a range of students, but do they have what they need to succeed in that environment? Is just being there enough?
Rogoff
Are all members of the community encouraged to participate in building the worths and curriculum? Are some values more prominent than others?
highlight what aspect of this setting each of them would not be able to comment on. Are there any benefits in asking all of them rather than only one of them to visit this setting?
reflect on any aspects/ issues that a combination of these four theorists may not adequately comment on. What are these, and why?