Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Does it matter if our acquisition of knowledge happens in “bubbles” where…

- - - - OR maybe the bubble is our class? and we don't accept any other input from other classes? like different subjects?
- - - - maybe we would restrict ourselves to only use methods that are exclusive to our own cultures
      - maybe we restrict our acquisition of knowledge based on the usual/normal teachings in our community
  - - - but this is questionable because we always consider multiple views and theories in a subject's syllabus
        
        maybe not very accurate to assume that a bubble is like a class
- - - - but how can it be no difference though? surely if we receive outside informations or opinions we would get different results
  - - - example
- - - - they may have different approaches and views when tackling an information/theory
- - - - so it doesn't matter if you were properly educated or you have a teacher. because it's special to you and it always will be. (but this is just visual arts though).
    - - how an individual perceives something. but what do they look at?
        
        in visual arts: what differentiates between artistic people and normal people's interpretation? what makes them think differently? in what way do they think differently?
    - - i think when youre in a bubble, you'll generally think differently from people outside of it.
  - - - films evolve from silent films to black and white to colour to hd
        
        the content of films are also different in which nowadays the public largely appeals to action (with a lot of CGI), something people of the past cannot do
        
        so what happens if an individual refuses to listen to the idea that art is evolving and some ideas are just not relevant anymore? it won't sell and it won't appeal to the audience
        
        this becomes detrimental because from this point, we can see that evolution is highly important to stay relevant with the changing of times and how trends also keep evolving
        
        so now we know that we NEED to listen outside of our bubble and listen to the voices around us
- - - - if you don't listen to other perspectives, how is the public supposed to accept your results and findings?
        
        people are more inclined to trust your findings if you consider every possible angle and deduce on WHY your experiment is the most accurate and could be utilised
        
        give the people (especially the experts) the chance to dwell and decide which approach is more accurate. is it yours (in your bubble) or other opinions (outside bubble)?
  - - - Copernicus proposed that the Earth was a planet and orbited the Sun instead
        
        This idea was accepted and received other input from Johannes Kepler, Galileo, Newton and Albert Einstein to form the widely accepted theory that is used today
        
        people in the past accepted Aristotle's theory, but after input from other experts over time, people begin to accept THEIR theory instead
        
        and now this has become the widely known and accepted theory in society and even is taught in school syllabuses