Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
modernization theories and facts, ENDOGENOUS DEMOCRATIZATION - Coggle…
modernization theories and facts
examining exclusively the impact of development, rather than seeking broadly to explain the dynamic of political regimes.
Endogenous: emerge democracy by developing
Lipset: becomes complex
"a general path to democracy"
there should be more democracy
after development of autocracy
autocracy should richer which is not
Democracy do not often emerge as this way
neither autocracy fall
Modernization lead to demo, REALLY?? NO!
Only in "old countries"
exogenous: survive in developed countries
in democracy: the more well-to-do, more survived
education
struggle in poor countries is attractive
marginal gain is higher
Lipset: wealth moderates by distributional conflicts
"destabilized by when countries grew rapidly
extremist movement: racism and comunism"
NO
Poor democracy face crisis
No ups or downs
Slightly
The history repeat is controversial
dynamic
entrance new country
Western Europe is unique
the way to demo isn't repeated
cross-sectional observations
Were the probabilities different WW2 in Europe and others
Were they different after WW2 that existed before 1950 and those that became independent later
democracy emerged scatterly
not differ
fall in poor countries
democracy in new countries are fragiles
autocracy in old countries are easy to fall
democratization is not depended on the conditions or past
Action counted
democracy can be realized at any level of development
economy play a role when demo is established
current wealth is not decisive, growing is
the chances of survival is higher when the country is richer
ENDOGENOUS DEMOCRATIZATION
challenge Przeworski in theory
income growth increase the incentives for the ruling faction to democracy
then empirical part
correct a sample problem by expanding observations
estimate a model