Does it matter if our acquisition of knowledge happens in “bubbles” where some information and voices are excluded? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
why it matters? bad to exclude
Eg: Cambridge Analytica takes advantage on bubbles by taking public information
scientists who are excluded for certain reasons? -that outside bubble eg:Barbara Clock
thoughts
doesn't matter? okay to exclude
prompt breakdown
does it matter
bubbles
echo chamber
click to edit
facebook
-learning from people who are same(age,like)
-young gen don't use
International School
good/bad
usefulness/ethics
does it matter ethically, excluding?
knowledge gain outside vs inside
should/shouldn’t
excluded artists- art
did this matter? it may have not mattered at all
Should we draw attention to the minority if the majority is certain
exclude some people is good, because the knowledge is valid
eg: False balance
create bubbles for the sake of national security! What has this happened?
create a bubble for an ethical reason
eg: fake president
excluding voices to be ethical
click to edit
can there be purely subjective knowledge?
can there be purely objective knowledge?
what is required to share another's perspective?