Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Specific Performance - Coggle Diagram

- - - - JC Williamson v Lukey and Mullohound inapplicable if constant supervision required
      - Irish Lift manufactuers suggests not overly rigid
      - Resident Porter Porter cases
        
        Ryan v Mutual Tontine contract said porter would be present - impracticable as would require constant court supervision
        
        Posner covenant that required porter to clean common areas - court granted as no cosntant supervision to be done - the duties to be done defined
    - - Wanze Properties v 5 Star Supermarket supermarket profit making - specific performance granted to keep trading
      - Dakota Packaging meant to give 12 hour notice, didn't - not granted - damages better
      - Co-op v Argyle sports - anchor store for shopping centre loss making, wanted to close, shopping centre sought specific performance, not granted - would cause unnecessary hardship damages more appropriate
  - - - equity doesn't assist a volunteer
    - - Flight v Bollard minor refused specific performance, as would not have been granted against minor
    - - Patel v Ali long delay in completion, vendor developed cancer, had leg amputated, had 2 children, limited english, husband died very reliant on members - would cuase undue hardship to force her to move
    - - Smelter Corp v O'Driscoll elderly lady told house would be compulsorily purchased if didn't sell (not true) - unjust to specifical enforce it
    - - Taylor v Caldwell dance hall built down
      - Titantic Quarter v Rowe subsequently lost job as unable to complete the sale
    - - Lazards Brother v Fairfield Mayfair if time of essence wouldn't have granted
- - - - McCarron worked as farm labourer for 16 years, verbal agreement would inherit land - SC granted specific performance despite not in writing