Spillover & Connectedness:
Commodity Prices (CP)

LITERATURE REVIEW

CONCLUSION

RESULTS

EXPECTATIONS

METHODOLOGY

ESTIMATION

VARIABLES

R PACKAGES

INTERPRETATIONS

INTRODUCTION

What?

OBJECTIVES

Methodology

SENSITIVITY

No connection

PAPER 2

PAPER 1

PAPER 3

PAPER 4

PAPER 5

CONNECTEDNESS

POLICY RECOMMENDED

ECONOMETRICS METHOD

Co-integration

Granger Causality

Zhang, Y., Ding, S., & Scheffel, E. M. (2019). A key determinant of commodity price Co-movement: the role of daily market liquidity. Economic Modelling, 81, 170-180.

Types of commodities: Oil, Silver, Gold, Corn, Live cattle

CP: Corn, Wheat, Maize

Common liquidity factor was identified to which drives the 5 commodity prices to move along a common trend

Market more (less) liquid, all CP tend to move up (down) in the same direction

Policy makers draw valuable lessons from monitoring daily commodity liquidity dynamics as timely bellwhether for incipent inflation and to more efficiently control inflation risk.

Literature in Intro: Objection to the view that trends in commodity prices occupying more prominent position on most central banks' watch list of key economic indicators:

Cody and Mills 1991: A close relationship between CP and CPI

Clarida et al. 1991: CP strongly inform movements in inflation, interest rates and output (GDP)

Bhar and Hamori 2008: CP can be informative for formulating monetary policy, due to the role played as input factors to industrial production

Stock and Watson 2003: Argued that CP are useful as predictors for inflation and output growth

Holtemoller and Mallick 2016: Employed both an estimated VARX and small open economy New Keynesian model to demonstrate that global food price shocks constitute an important contributor to cost-push inflation in India

Mallick and Sousa 2013: Estimated a battery modern dynamic macroeconometric models in order to robustly identify the importance of commodity price shocks, which lead to rise in inflation and demand a more aggressive behavior from central banks towards inflation stabilization

Bernanke 2008: Calls for the development of a better understanding of the factors that underpin commodity prices

Aim: To identify a high-frequency market liquidity bellwhether and investigate its potential in signaling changes in CP trends

Findings

Evidence demonstrating how daily measures of liquidity observed across different commodity markets exhibit a tendency to co-move in accordance with the existence of a common liquidity factor

Shown with such a common liquidity bellwether may be underpinning much of observed co-movement of commodity prices, by presenting evidence from a series of co-integrating regressions and Granger causality test

Statistically establish the existence of significant daily price co-movement among different commodity classes

Liquidity can drive aggregate price shock, which amplify inflation risk

Additional tests further suggest that the impact of liquidity on CP co-movement is stronger in a post-2008 financial crisis sub-sample of our complete data set

Result

Dynamic linear regression carried out on lagged liquidity variables & commodity market CRB index to control for changes in overall macroeconomic conditions

Co-integrating regression analysis similar from Leybourne et al. 1994

Note

click to edit

click to edit

Establishing the existence of a co-integrating & long-run equilibrium relationship between CP co-movements and common liquidity factors

Liquidity effect on prices is not only found to spill over across different commodity sector boundaries, but also to propagate across different maturities of commodity futures securities

Gap

Establish existence and usefulness of common commodity liquidity bellwether as an important market-derived

Real-time predictor of cross-sectional CP co-movements

Presence of a series of long-run co-integrating relationships between common liquidity bellwether and array of CP while establishing predictive utility

Literature

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

Gap

Literature in Intro

Results

Literature

Findings

Methodology

Abstract

Note

Liu, L., Tan, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Can commodity prices forecast exchange rates?. Energy Economics, 87, 104719.

Gap

Methodology

Results

Literature in Intro

Findings

Literature

Abstract

Hegerty, S. W. (2016). Commodity-price volatility and macroeconomic spillovers: Evidence from nine emerging markets. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 35, 23-37.

Note

Results

Gap

Findings

Methodology

Abstract

Literature in Intro

Literature

Note

Eberhardt, M., & Presbitero, A. F. (2021). Commodity prices and banking crises. Journal of International Economics, 131, 103474.

Gap

Result

Literature in Intro

Findings

Literature

Abstract

Note

Ferraro, D., Rogoff, K., & Rossi, B. (2015). Can oil prices forecast exchange rates? An empirical analysis of the relationship between commodity prices and exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 54, 116-141.

click to edit

click to edit

Fluctuations in CPs can have strong linkages with entire macroeconomy, currency are most closely connected

Commodity exports bring in foreign exchange, any volatility can ahve direct impact on balance of payments

1980s & 1990s: Period of financial instability, most concentrated among commodity exporters. Handful on developing countries have been hit by systemic banking crises over past 2 decades.

Factors contributed, an extended period of sustained economic growth, financial deepening and favorable external conditions, period of stable and high CPs

Limitation: The existence of out-of-sample correlation is not informative regarding economic causality in the data

Monetary fundamentals do not help forecast EXR out-of-sample not even in terms of out-of-sample fit, at the monthly or quarterly frequencies

Methodology

Investigates the predictive content of CPs for exchange rates (EXR)

17 Popular commodities including crude oil

Average commodity returns can successfully predict the level and excess returns to EXR of currencies in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa for in-sample and out-sample perspectives

Excess currency returns is economically significant

Mean-variance allocating wealth between domestic and foreign bonds can improve the portfolio performance by using commodity forecasts of currency return instead of benchmark of historical average forecasts.

In-sample evidence shows significant Granger causality

Shown CPs can successfully predict short-term EXR of commodity currencies, providing a potential way to partly resolve the "Meese-Rogoff" puzzle

Period: Jan 1975 - Dec 2015

click to edit

click to edit

Out-sample indicate the univariate predictive regression with commodity factors produces significantly more accurate exchange rate forecasts than benchmark of random walk model for all 4 currencies

Detected predictive content of CPs for currency excess return and significant predictability in-sample and out-sample

This portfolio is fully exposed to EXR risk

Dynamic portfolio formed by commodity forecasts of currency return has a higher annualized return 1.6% - 3.1% than the portfolio formed by benchmark of historical average forecasts

  1. World CP fluctuations potentially explain a major component of their terms-of-trade fluctuations in these countries
  1. World commodity price is exogenous to EXR to a large extent

Chen & Rogoff 2003: Pointed out that changes in WCPs are exogenous to small economies

Kilian 2009: Price of some commodities like crude oil are even exogenous to the US economy in short-term

Basher et al. 2012, 2016: Price of some commodities have important influences on EXR

  1. Commodity factor addresses the model uncertainty which causes worse forecasting performance of economic models

Dangl & Halling 2012, Rapach et al. 2010: Forecast combination approaches have been widely employed in asset price forecasting studies (FAVG)

Currency predictability can be explained that CP provide useful info regrading future business changes

Kilian 2009, Wen et al. 2012, Zhang 2017, Salisu et al. 2018, Wang et al 2013, 2019: Oil price shocks have essential impacts on the variables reflecting economic activities

Verdelhan 2010: Proposes a habit model which advocates that domestic investor is more risk-averse than foreign counterparts when the economy is a recession so the author expects a positive currency excess return during bad times at home, creating the predictability of excess return

Lustig et al 2014: Found countercyclical behavior of expected return on a short position in the dollar and long position in a basket of foreign currencies

None

Dependent variable: EXR

Currencies: AUD, CAD, NZD, ZAR

Reason: 4 countries primmary commodities account for significant fraction of their exports

Price decrease cause capital outflows

Deteriorations in balance of payments

Reduction in competitiveness

This paper studies the volatility processes of 6 major CPs

Price increases lead to currency appreciation

Before applying Multivariate GARCH to examine spillovers among the variables

Global CPs has large increase during Global Financial Crisis & steep decline after the crash

Chile is most closely tied to copper price, Indonesia to oil and tin

  1. GARCH: univariate volatility processes

1.a. Oil prices and 4 CP

Period: 1980

  1. VAR: multivariate for each country

Monthly data

Found that volatility of CPs is a significant predictor of banking crises in a sample of 60 low-income countries

Shown that major channel through which CP movements can affect the real economy is through their effect on banks' balance sheets and financial stability

In contrast to findings on advanced, emerging economies, credit booms and capital inflows do not play a significant role in predicting banking crises

Historical data 40 peripheral economies between 1848 and 1938

Effect of CPs volatility on banking crises is concentrated in LICs with fixed EXR regime and high share of primary goods in production

CPs volatility is likely to trigger financial instability through a reduction in government revenues and shortening of sovereign debt maturity, which weaken the banks' balance sheets

Motivation: zoom in experience of LICs and focus on the role CPs in driving financial sector distress

Logit model enables to maintain full sample of 60 countries including non-experienced crises episode hat estimation can be interpreted as within-country estimates

Developed a LIC-specific early warning system for systemic banking crises by Laeven & Valencia 2013

Since 2014, increasing number of LICs have been experiencing financial distress, declining bank profitability and deterioration in bank asset quality

Hardy & Pazarbasioglu 1999: Banking system distress are differ across economies with different structural characteristics

Fernandez et al 2017: Since 1960s global shocks to CPs account for about one quarter of output fluctuations in LICs, they are comparable with richer countries and has significantly increased over past 15 years with financialization of commodity markets

Reinhart & Rogoff 2013: Graduation from banking crises has so far proven illusive

Random effects logit model approach by Mundlak 1978 & Chamberlain 1982

Mendoza 1997, Deaton 1999, Kose 2002, Raddatz 2007, Cespedes & Velasco 2012: CPs is motivated by the observation that they are one of the most important factors driving economic aggregates in developing countries

Koren & Tenreyro 2007, Fernandez-Villaverde at al 2011: Shown the importance of volaitlity shocks for economic growth and development

None

Bloom 2009: Found uncertainty shocks including CPs have real effects on firms' hiring and investment decisions

Bleaney and Greenaway 2001, Blattman et al 2007, Williamson 2012, Cavalcanti et al 2015: Shown the volatility of CPs more than growth are matters for output fluctuations

CPs fluctuations through Financial Channels: Due to effect on balance sheets and financial stability

Cespedes and Velasco 2012, Agarwal et al 2020: Shown a fall in CPs reduces bank lending for commodity exporter of developing countries

Kinda et al 2018: Found that negative CP shocks are associated with higher non-performing loans and lower bank profitability

Caprio and Klingebiel 1996a, 1996b: Documented a number of banking crises in 1980s and early 1990s and show that volatile terms of trade as associated with systemic crises, specifically on countries with a concentrated export base

Terms of trade fluctuation leading to financial instability and crises

  1. Sharp drop in prices translate into revenues for exporting firms which is more difficult to service their debt obligations, with potential negative effects on banks asset quality
  1. Caprio & Klingebiel 1996b: Large variations in prices increase asymmetric information and make it more difficult to select good from bad borrowers

a. Emphasized key role that CPs play in triggering financial sector stress. So, this paper help whether fluctuations in CPs can help predict banking crises

a.i. Agarwal et al 2020: Shown declining CPs are associated with worsening bank health and lead to a contraction of bank lending in LICs

b. Most literature looking at advanced and emerging markets so focused in this paper towards LICs.

60 LICs

Period; 1963 - 2015

CPs, oil prices connectedness: post Asian Financial crisis

Existence of short term relationship at daily frequency between changes in price of a country's major commodity export and changes in nominal EXR

Relationship appears to be robust & to hold when using contemporaneous CP changes in regression

Main focus on Canadian - US Dollar

Focusing whether price of country's major commodity export can predict movement in its nominal EXR in a pseudo out-sample forecasting exercise

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

Methodology

Daily frequency

Short run co-movement

Canadian-US Dollar EXR

Oil prices

Little systemic relation between CP changes and EXR changes at monthly and quarterly frequencies

CP related to daily nominal EXR of commodity currencies

Relationship is statistically and economically significant

Predictive ability of lagged realized CP changes is more ephemeral (temporary)

Allowing time variation in relative performance is crucial to show that lagged CPs can be statistically significant predictors of EXR out-of-sample

Effects of oil price changes on EXR changes are short-lived & frequency of data is crucial to capture

Conditional on knowing the future value of CPs and forecsting the EXR well

Good model to forecast oil prices, could exploit to forecast future EXR

Buyuksahin & Robe 2014: Studied commodity future markets & financialization. Their evidence condirms role of speculators in driving cross-market correlations between equity returns and commodity returns

Chen et al 2010: Found EXR predict CPs at quarterly frequency and CPs do not predict EXR. Focusing on CP indices, which average across several commodities, not just individual commodities

Faust et al 2003: Predictive ability easier to find in a real-time data

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

Amano & Van Norden 1998a,b, Issa et al 2008, Cayen at al 2010: In-sample explanatory variables fro real EXR. Considering out-sample predictive ability for nominal exchange rates

Focusing on investigating whether there exist economic fundamentals linked to EXR fluctuations

Stronger at daily frequency

Focusing on short-horizon predictive ability

Found predictive ability using daily data which disappears at longer horizon

Uses real-time data but uses economic fundamentals that is very different from traditional ones

Country; Canada due to crude oil export high, sufficient long history of market-based floating EXR, small open economy and small size in world oil market (price taker)

Canadian - US interest rate

Past values of CPs were not good forecasts of future values of CPs cause ended up rejecting the predictive ability CPs

Brazil & Philippines are less affected

Russia is highly insulated from fluctuations in world oil prices

CP volatility spillovers to country's EXR or output but also policymakers can react and impacting interest rates and inflation

Make policymakers in making difficult decisions

Drop in CP can cause a drop in GDP

Van der Ploeg and Poelhekke 2009: Both oil and non-oil price volatility reduce economic growth and contributed to 'resource curse'

Aim: Studying the effect of CP volatility on 9 emerging markets

Monthly log changes in output, interest rates, CPs, EXR & price of each country's important commodity

PAPER 6

Cui, J., Goh, M., & Zou, H. (2021). Coherence, extreme risk spillovers, and dynamic linkages between oil and China’s commodity futures markets. Energy, 225, 120190.

Abstract

Results

Gap

Findings

Literature in Intro

Literature

ARMA method

Each country behaves idiosyncratically. EXR & inflation volatility are linked to CP fluactuations in more cases rather than output and interest rates

Examined individual results being Chile the 'commodity currency'

Chilean economy influences copper prices indicating traders recognize the country's strong ties to metal

Not all central banks must be as sensitive to CP swings as others

Defining countries by categories: Commodity economies, Diversified exporters, insulated oil exporters (less affected by oil price shocks)

In the long run, diversification into manufacturing may help protect countries from wild swings in CPs

In short run, countries must manage risk either through capital controls or inflation targeting monetary policy to avoid transmission to EXR and prices

Note

Included Global Financial Crisis 2008-2009, European Sovereign Debt Crisis 2010-2012, Oil prices collapse 2014-2016, China's stock market crisis 2015 and ongoing Covid-19 pandemic

click to edit

Methodology

Investigate time-frequency dependence

Extreme spillovers

Dynamic linkages

Shown that oil market exhibit higher coherence with copper, natural rubber, fuel oil futures

Shown low coherence with corn, soybeans, soybean meal, white sugar futures on long term scale

Investigations towards oil and Chinas commodity futures markets

Quantile connectedness approach (Risk net-pairwise connectedness network)

DECO-FIAPARCH model

Wavelet coherence

Total risk connectedness at extreme lower quantile level 0.01 is higher than conditional mean and median level

The main spillovers net-transmitters: WTI oil, Brent oil, soybean oil and copper futures

DECO model: point to time-varying with low average equi-correlations between oil and commodity futures

Risk spillover net-recipients; White sugar, soybean, soybean meal, cotton, corn, aluminium, natural rubber and fuel oil futures

Dynamic extreme negative risk spillovers are highly volatile & vulnerable to major international events (GFC, oil price plunge and Covid 19 pandemic)

Brent oil offer better portfolio diversification benefits than WTI oil

Optimal-weighted portfolio illustrates the highest risk and downside risk reduction effectiveness

Period; Jan 2006 - Dec 2020

Correlation

  1. Extreme spillovers between oil and China's commodity futures markets should be monitored constantly since affecting the hedging and portfolio diversification
  1. Investors in China's commodity futures should be alert to the extreme risk spillovers transmitted from oil markets and hold oil assets in their portfolios to diversify portfolio risk
  1. Chinese govt should establish a forward-looking extreme spillover warning mechanism to avert systemic financial risks
  1. Investors and portfolio managers should develop dynamic and alternative portfolios and regularly recalibrate their portfolio strategies according to specific market conditions
  1. China should strengthen its crude oil reserves and seek more cleaner and sustainable energy resources to reduce high dependence on crude oil imports and minimize the negative impacts caused by the significant oil price fluctuations
  1. Emergency response mechanism for major crisis events should be further enhanced

PAPER 7

Teterin, P., Brooks, R., & Enders, W. (2016). Smooth volatility shifts and spillovers in US crude oil and corn futures markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 38, 22-36.

Abstract

Findings

Results

Gap

Methodology

Literature in Intro

Literature

Paper approached allow for breaks in both mean and variance equations

Used GARCH allows smooth shifts in volatility spillovers between the 2 markets

Controlling for breaks in GARCH model helps alleviate the problem of spurious persistence

Examining future prices

click to edit

Aim: Examine the changing relationship between energy and agricultural markets for crude oil (petroleum) and corn prices (grain)

PAPER 8

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

click to edit

Abstract

Shah, A. A., & Dar, A. B. (2021). Exploring diversification opportunities across commodities and financial markets: Evidence from time-frequency based spillovers. Resources Policy, 74, 102317.

Findings

Results

Gap

Methodology

click to edit

Literature in Intro

click to edit

Literature

Note

click to edit

click to edit

Note

Biofuel production is not likely to be highly responsive to short-run oil price changes

Corn and oil future prices often move together and that both volatilities are far larger in the latter third of the sample than during the 1990s.

crude and corn futures prices

To obtain empirical volatility response functions & time-varying correlation coefficient

Multivariate GARCH model

Short term and long term futures exhibit shift in mean and volatility

Trigonometric function

Volatility do not manifest in the same manner for different maturities

Indicating that term structure of futures volatility changes over time

Hertel & Beckman 2011, Tyner 2010, Muhammad & Kebede 2009: Argued the increased reliance on biofuels is a key factor contributing to the increased linkages between the grain and petroleum markets.

Enders & Holt 2012: Suggested rapid income growth in emerging economies (BRIC) countries is one of the primary drivers of the price boom, citing increased demand for both agricultural and energy products.

Summer 2009, Wright 2011: From 2006 through mid 2008 grains experienced one of the largest percentage price increases in history and that volatility increases sustained

Enders & Holt

In contrast

Trujillo-Barrera et al 2012: Argued that underinvestment in agriculture, low inventory levels, supply shocks in key producing regions, fiscal expansion and lax monetary policy in many countries, and depreciation of the US dollar, have also contributed to increased commodity price volatility

Wetzstein and Wetzstein 2011: Strong connection between oil and agricultural prices is a myth because of creation of biofuel capacity entails adjustment costs non-reversibilities and uncertainties

Tyner 2010, Hertel & Beckaman 2011, Saghaian 2010, Zhang et al 2010: Found that changes in government policy and non-petroleum input price changes often govern large movements in grain prices

Myers et al 2014: Use common trend-cycle decompositions and find that co-movements between energy and agricultural feedstock prices tend to dissipate in the long run.

Zhang et al 2009, Trujillo-Barrera et al 2012: Model the agricultural and petroleum prices in a multivariate GARCH setting and explore volatility spillovers, but do not allow for structural breaks in mean or variance

Perron 1989; It is important to allow mean & volatility breaks as demonstrated that neglected structural change in mean and variance equations typically result in suprious existence

2012: Examine the behavior of real petroleum and agricultural prices over 50 year period and identify structural changes in each by estimating shifting-mean autoregression

2014: Generalized the procedure and estimate the prices as a mean-shifting VAR

Both of these papers treat the conditional variance of each market as a constant, so they ignore the possibility of volatility shifts spillovers

BRIC countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China

low-frequency trigonometric functions into conditional variance equations in order to capture the growth of BRIC

Multivariate GARCH framework

Gallant 1981: Gallant's Flexible Fourier Form to allow for breaks in VAR with GARCH effects and show means and variance-covariance matrix of corn and crude oil futures exhibit structural change

Structural change in volatility presents in both short-term & long term futures contracts

Baillie & Myers 1991, Brunetti & Gilbert 2000, Jin & Frechette 2004: Found that CP exhibit long memory in that conditional volatilities appear to be fractionally integrated

Variance impulse response function suggested by Hafner & Herwartz 2006

Variance impulse response function to assess whether controlling for volatility breaks leads to reduction in volatility persistence

Daily settlement prices of corn and crude oil futures

  1. Price discovery is important feature of exchange-traded futures. Informed traders will prefer futures over spot transactions due to low margin requirements and lack of physical products.
  1. Brooks 2012: crude oil & corn futures are characterized more as unarbitraged rather than fully arbitraged markets so futures prices may reflect future expected spot prices
  1. Future markets permit the analysis of maturity time dimension and calendar time dimension so volatility shocks & spillovers can be studied from both short term and long term perspectives

Connectedness between CPs and oil prices among oil-rich countries

1997-2019

VAR/GARCH

Diebold-Yilmaz, DY Approach: Total Spillover, Directional spillover & net pairwise spillovers

To identify the connectedness between the 2 markets

To forecast inflation and develop comparative analysis

CPs (corn, soybean, sugar, wheat, maize), Oil, gold

Forecasting the EXR

Significant impact between CPs and oil. High oil prices affect commodity prices

Spillover index: FrequencyConnectedness

Spillover increases at post-crisis period: relatively higher during Global financial crisis, European Debt crisis, covid 19

Higher percentage of directional spillover indicates high connectedness

Financial assets

Usefulness of commodity prices in forecasting inflation

Currency values has strong connection with world commodity prices and will the linkage help in forecasting inflation

To examine the behavior of individual markets