Size of Business Ch 3

Problems from attempting to measure business size


There are many different ways to measure business size (large with one method and small with another)

There's no agreed upon definition of big or small when it comes to measuring business (subjective)

How to measure business size

Capital employed

Market capitalization

Revenue (sales turnover)

Market share

Number of Employees

market share = (total share of business/total sales of industry) x 100

market capitalisation = current share price × total number of shares issued

Revenue is the total amount of money received from sales

Used to compare business size from businesses in the same industry

The larger the business enterprise, the greater the value of capital needed for long-term investment

Value of all assets used by a company to generate earning

the total value of all a company's shares of stock

the percentage of an industry, or a market's total sales, that is earned by a particular company over a specified time period

how to measure size of a hotel?

capital employed

how to measure size of a mall?

how to measure office building (skyscraper)

Revenue

capital employed

Significance of small businesses

Which method is the best?

None of them!

It just depends on what needs to be measured

If absolute size is being measured then 2 or more of the criteria should be measured

Family businesses

Definition: businesses that employ relatively few people and has a relatively low revenue

Economic benefits

Dynamic new ideas: variety in consumer choice (can even change a whole industry)

Competition: Without them large businesses could just give consumers high prices and poor service as they have no other alternative

Important suppliers (to large businesses): they supply the specialist goods

Employment: collectively small firms employ most of the working sector

They can become big businesses: the economy will benefit from large scale new organizations in the future

Lower average cost: Cost benefit passed down to costumers

Advantages

Personal services offered

Personally know workers

Adapt quickly

Workers are more motivated and work different roles

Small risk of losing control

Can be started with low capital

Disadvantages

Important workers ill = business cannot operate

Not diversified (external risks have great effect)

Cannot specialize

No economies of sale (high average cost)

Limited financing

Businesses that are owned and managed by at least two members in the same family

Strengths

Reliability and pride - family name associated with the product so they try to maintain good relationships with their stakeholders

Knowledge continuity - Usually it's passed on to the next generation

Commitment - family wants the business to grow so they work hard

Weaknesses

Informality - Can lead to inefficiencies and later conflicts

Tradition - Reluctance to change systems or procedures

Succession/continuity problem - Lack of skill of later generations

Conflict - Family problems can start affecting the performance of a businesss

Importance in economic

80% of new jobs in developing countries are created by small businesses

Innovative (create new product and service)

Most of the working population re employed by small businesses

Generate economic growth (especially in places with no larger companies)

Role in some industries

Can specialize in things and fill in gaps in the market like perhaps offer specialized IT services because they are more flexible and can adapt to the changes of costumers and their wants

Can do the tasks that bigger businesses would want to avoid like employer training which could lead to decreased average costs for the larger business

Business growth

Why they want to

Increased economies of sale - Bigger businesses get to benefit from things like buying in bulk

Increased power and status for owners and directors - Bigger b businesses that are better known have very powerful CEO's and managers

Increased market share - If the business is bigger and sells more they will have a larger market share and be better known

Increased profit - bigger businesses sometimes make more revenue so sometimes they make more profit

Reduced risk of takeover - larger business may be too big of a target for takeover companies

Organic growth

A fast food restaurant could open more locations with the money they retained from their profits

It is the growth of a business through internal processes

DEFINE!

Merger

Takeover

External growth

Conglomerate integration

The growth of a company using external resources and capabilities rather than from internal business activity

A brand merges with another brand to make an even bigger brand

When two separate businesses combine into a new legal entity

When google and android merged

When a company buys out another

Exxon taking over Mobil

Two businesses merging, however those businesses partake in things that are completely different from the other

Like how Yamaha has pianos but also motorcycles, because they merged

Vertical integration

Horizontal integration

Forward vertical integration

Backward vertical integration

When a business merges with a mother business from a different production stage

backwards and forwards vertical integration

When a business joins with another business at the stage of the supply chain

An ice cream shop merges with another ice cream shop and becomes an even bigger ice cream shop

When a business merges or takeover a business further up in the supply chain

A vehicle manufacturer buys a car retailing business

When a business merges or takeover a business lower down in the supply chain

A vehicle manufacturer purchases a vehicle parts manufacturer

Horizon tal integration

Disadvantage

Impact

Advantage

Economies of scale (potential)

Concentrating output on one site instead of two

Eliminates one competitor

Increased power over suppliers (low prices)

May bring bad publicity and redundancy

Costumer opposition

Monopoly

Consumers have less choice (may have to pay more)

Less job security

Suppliers have to offer lower prices

Shareholder's impact depends on whether profits rise or not

Local community job losses

Forward vertical integration

Advantage

Control of promotion and pricing

Secure outlet for business (may exclude competitor's product)

Disadvantage

Consumers react negatively

Business lack experience in this sector

Impact

Greater job security

Varied career opportunities

Consumer resents lack of competition

Shareholder's impact depends on whether profits rise

Backward vertical integration

Advantage

Control of quality, price and delivery times

Encourages joint research and development to improve quality of supplies

Business control supplies of materials to competitors

Disadvantage

Business lacks experience managing this sector

Fully satisfied with the guaranteed costumer (doesn't try)

Impact

More career opportunities

Improved quality and more innovative products (consumer)

Control of supplies may limit choice for consumers

Profits may rise and benefit shareholders

Conglomerate integration

Advantages

Diversifies business

Spreads risk (could enter fast growing market)

Disadvantages

Lag of management experience in different sectors

Lack of focus and direction (because of spread)

Impact

Workers have more career opportunities

More job security

Profits could rise and benefit shareholders

Merger/talkerover (how it will achieve its objectives)

Econom ies of scale can lower the average cost per unit

Marketing and distribution cost can go down if because both of them can use the same sales outlet and teams

The business will not only be able to share buildings and equipments, but also ideas that may result in better results for the business than if they did it alone

If they share their stuff and equipment it can make it so that there's less duplicates

Merger/talkerover (how it won't achieve its objectives)

The bigger business may be too big to control effectively (diseconomies of scale)

They may have different cultures and styles of management that could result in fights and disagreements and make things less efficient

If the businesses make very different products then there might be little benefit from being able to combine their research

Rate of growth may be too hard for directors to manage well

Problems of growth from takeovers/mergers

Finance

Managerial

Problems

Solutions

Problems

Solutions

More fixed and working capital needed ASAP

Can result in negative cash flow and increased long term borrowing and interest

Takeovers can cost a lot (stretches the businesses' money)

Raise money from selling shares

Offer shares not cash to pay for takeover

Use internal sources of finance

Existing management unable to cope with the double in size overnight

Culture clash

Lack of coordination

Desentralization policy

New management culture

New management system, structure and policies

Strategic alliances

Two companies banning together and making a deal that benefits each other while still being its own business

the difference between joint venture

joint venture is when you open a new business together and work on that business

in strategic alliance you don't open a new business together you just help each other out in different aspects