Land Registration Pt I

Torrens Title

Indefeasibilty

Immediate

Deferred

A system of registration of interest in land

Allows for the efficient transfer of land

The registration provides indefeasible title

Land Title Act 1994 (Qld) s 38.
The indefeasible title for a lot is the current particulars in the freehold land register about the lot.

Land Titles Act 1994 (Qld) s 184(1) A registered proprietor of an interest in a lot holds the interest subject to registered interests affecting the lot but free from all other interests.

History

The system is built upon three abiding principles

Developed by Robert Torrens, building upon German and Hanseatic systems, 'title by registration' was first implemented in South Australia in 1856.


Torrens idea was to implement a land registration system that was reliable, cheap, simple, expeditious and suitable for ordinary people.

Curtain Principle

Insurance Principle

Mirror Principle

Breskvar v Wall (1971) 126 CLR 376

B (RP)

Petrie (P)

Inserts Wall (W) as transferee on transfer FRAUDULENT (W grandson of P

Transfer
(Name of tranferee blank
[carelessness by B] -> Qld Stamp Act s 53(5)


Transfer void and in equity

Became aware of registration of 1st fraudulent transfer to W

Void transfer registered (W-RP)

Sale to Albun P/L

Appropriate form of transfer

handed to Alban on completion

not yet lodged for registration

B lodges caveat before A can register transfer from W

Barwick CJ

The Torrens system of registered title is not a system of registration of title, but a system of title by registration.

The leading authority in supportof interpreting the indefeasibilty acquired upon registration by a registered proprietor under a Torrens Act is immediate upon the registration and is not deferred by reason of the voidness of the instrument leading to registration.

Though registered, indefeasibility may be denied due to the title of the registered interest holder being compromised by a void or voidable instrument which led to the registration

Clement v Ellis HCA
Gibbs v Messer Privy Council

Protection of Individual Terms in Registered Instruments

Dynamic Security

Static Security

The matters that arise in considering how indefeasibility applies to registered instruments such as mortgages involves several dimensions

the nature of the underpinning loan contract and what debt is actually secured by the mortgages

introduction of verification of identity (VOI) responsibilities upon mortgagees in proving the identity of mortgagors to create valid Torrens title mortgage

the implications of forgery

any implications of the introduction of the NMF

Mercantile Credits v Shell Ltd (1976) 136 CLR 326 HCA

Volunteers