Sociology

Quialitative Interviews

Case studies

Questionnaries and social surveys

Closed or pre-coded questions

Scaled questions

Open questions

Produce mainly quantitative data.

The researcher limits the responses that can be given

strongly agree /agree/neither agree nor disagree/
disagree/strongly disagree.

Self-completion questionnaire

Unstructured interviews

Semi-structured interviews

Group interviews

Brief set of prompts

Aim is to get the interviewee to talk free and the interviewer will try not to say very much

. Respondents answer the questions without any additional
guidance from the researcher

Postal questionnaires

click to edit

Reach large numbers of people so you can have a
large sample

Ways of improving the response rate

Sending a letter explaining the research

Sending a stamped, addressed envelope

Following up those who do not respond

Making the questionnaire as short and easy to complete as possible

Giving clear instructions and questions

Using people’s names in a letter

Incentive of money or the chance of being entered in
a prize draw if the questionnaire is returned.

The interviewer has an interview guide, that is, a lis of questions or fairly specific topics to be covered

Structure interviews

The researcher reads out the questions, including the answers allowed in closed questions, and records the respondents’ answers for them. This can be done as a telephone questionnaire or face-to-face

Guidelines for good interviews

Make the interviewee feel confortable

Create a certain amount of order, so the questions flow reasonably well

Language has to be undersandbale and relevant

Good Questionnarie desing

Keept a fact sheet record

The interview have to take place on a quiet and private setting

Are about one particular topic

The reasercher will have an interview guide with the different types of questions

Short with a clear layout

Clear and easy instructions

Many questions as necessary

Enable researchers to find out not just what individuals say but what they say as members of a group

Start with questions that are likely to interest participants

t enough alternative answers to allow participants to express their views

Strengths

Provide detail and valid data on teh point of view of response

Flexibility of the interview allows the interview to probe more deeply

Questions should not imply that an answer is right or wrong

Limitations

Time consuming

Avoid words that might not be understood by everyone

Difficult to replicate so they are less reliable that structred interviews

Questions that s that participants are likely to know
about and be able to give meaningful answers to.

Standardies questions are not used so is difficult to make generalistaoins

The respones may be affected by interviewer bias

Involve detail research on one or more examples of people or things

Can involve any method or combination of methods, quantitative or cualitative

Leave personal information for the end

Strengths

Can prove a deep and detail account of the case

Limitations

Strenghts

May be possible to draw wider conclusions

Strenghts

Allow different aspects of the case being studies to be explored using appropiate methods

Limitations

May only apply to the case so generalisations cannot be made

Low Response Rates

The findings cannot be replicated

Misunderstood questions

Involvemtn of the researchers can lead to them being influenced by their feelings

No certanty of who answered the questions

Longitudinal studies

Some questions might be answered

Are carried out periodically over a period of time, rather than as a one-off piece of reaserch

Cheap

Large samples from distant locations

No influence from the interviewer

Strenghs

Can complete when they want

It can show people's lives changes over time

See what factors may have brought about changes in people´s lives over time

Limitations

Limitations

Requires a considerable commitment of time and research over time

Can explain questions

Can improve questions depending on the interviewer

Higher response rate

Participant and non participant observation

Trust and valid answers

Participant observation

Used to develop understanding of the world from the point of view of the subjects of the research

May influence answers

The research put themselves in the same position as those they are studing

More time and expensive

Participants may give socially desirable answers

3 stages of the partcipant

1) Getting in

2) Staying in

3) Getting out

The approach may change between interviews

Covert and overt participant observation

In covert participation observation the group being observed does not know that research is taking place

In overt role, the group is aware that the research is taking place

Strenghts

High in validity

Deep understanding can be observed

Limitations

The presence of the participant may affect the behaviour of the group

click to edit

Non-participant observationn

Main reason for this is to reduce or eliminate the risk that people will be affected by the presence of the researcher or a new member of their social group

Avoid Hawthrone effect

Problem --> Does not allow the reasercher to investigate the meanings people attach to the behaviour that is being obsvered

Content analysis

Used to study the content of documents and the mass media

Strenghts

Used the data to test sociological theories and to change the content of the mass media

Reliable

Limitations

Difficult to decide what categories to use

Difficult to allocate material to different catergories