foreign relations (1951-1964) PART 2

the korean war

suez

winds of change + decolonisation

heavy fighting, resulted in stalemate, agreed ceasefire (1953)

1000+ UK troops died

20+ countries supplied troops, Uk sent 90,000+ - 2nd biggest contingent after US

terms of ceasefire = korea split between communist north and non-communist south

condemned by UN, sent UN forces to combat invasion

korean war showed how cold war was being fought across whole world

1950, north korea forces, supported by USSR + China, invaded south

demonstrated UK's willingness to continue to play major role in world affairs - despite economic restraints

2 separate govts set up, each claiming legitimacy

however, was clear US was greater power

after WW2, Korea occupied by USSR in north, USA in south

details of plan hidden from Parliament and Americans

plan put into operation (29th October 1956) - military action didn't go to plan, caused storm of political protest in UK, Labour opposed conflict, anti-war protests held, public opinion split on need for intervention

Israel invade Egypt, UK + France intervene, excuse would be to enforce peace, real affect would be to seize control of Suez

importantly, US opposed. UK was not strong enough in 1956 to stand up to USA pressure - plunged into serious financial crisis

encouraged by France + Israel, agreed on plan of action in top-secret meeting (Sevres)

Macmillan, invasion supporter, first to realise it was essential to pull out - even if it meant accepting failure + humiliation

Eden saw Nasser as 'an evil dictator who could not be allowed to get away with provoked aggression'

Eden's reputation was fatally damaged

Eden, considered export on foreign policy, his understanding of situation was influenced by belief that UK was imperial power + experience in fiercely opposing appeasement in 30s

Suez meant UK's position went through fundamental reassessment in a number of ways:

Nasser's actions placed Egypt on Soviet side of Cold War

1) questioned reputation as a force for good

Nasser announced nationalisation of Suez to provide finance needed for Aswan Dam that US + GB planned to invest in - pulled out 1956

2) highlighted inability to act without tactic USA support

emergence of Egyptian independence under new leader (Nasser) deeply worried Britain's strategic interests

3) brought into sharp relief, impact of economic + financial policy had on direction of foreign policy

vital route for oil shipments; 80% of western europe's oil imports passed through canal

4) undermined the belief that, in new global situation after WW, UK was still a major world power

after Suez, policymakers reconsidered pace of decolonisation

1957, Ghana became first African colony to get independence from UK

struggle to contain Mau Mau already demonstrated colonial policy issues

Nigeria + Cyprus 1960

Mau Mau fighters accused of atrocities, revelations of brutal treatment of captivities at Hola prison camp = damaged reputation

Tanganyika + Sierra Leone 1961

Mau Mau rebellion, Kenya 1952, assumed would be easy to quash by military, independence was unthinkable at the time

Uganda 1963

early 1950s, Britain believed could manage gradual transition from Empire to New Commonwealth + could control movements until people were 'ready' for independence

Kenya 1963

not just Britain, France with Vietnam + Algeria, Belgium + Portugal with African colonies

shift in British policy signalled by Macmillan's 'winds of change'

British forces fought national independence movements in Malaysia, Cyprus + Kenya

before 1960, central aim of imperial policy = defeat nationalist revolts + maintain control over African colonies

1950s, colonial independence pressure movements = harder to contain

Macmillan's speech at Cape Town, described 'winds of change' blowing through Africa, a significant change of policy = decolonisation + recognition of independence; also able to persuade them to accept majority rule

1947, withdrawal from India - most dramatic example

in retrospect, policy was successful. process didn't always go as plan but completed swiftly with far less violence than others (Belgium + Portugal)

by 1951, empire retreat had already begun

1964, transition from Empire to Commonwealth represented significant achievement