Henry VIII - EOY revision
Foreign policy and marriage alliances
Society
Economy
Henry's attitudes towards his Kingship:
- Went to great lengths to maintain the Tudor dynasty/line of succession (ex. constant marrying and remarrying, obsession with having a son).
- Believed himself personally responsible for defending his kingdom from an attack. Wanted to become a warrior king. Pursued a far more traditional, and more expensive, interventionist foreign policy compared to Henry VII.
- Spoke of his right to the French crown, aware of Henry VI coronation as King of France some 80 years prior. Longed to achieve similar glory to Henry V at the Battle of Agincourt. Again, his desperation to become the picture of a 'Renaissance Prince' or warrior king.
- Wanted to be an imperial King, an idea which placed the King next in line following God in the religious hierarchy.
Henry's marriage alliance key dates:
- Catherine of Aragon: married - 11 June 1509, died - 7 Jan 1536, had Henry (born 1511, died 1511) and Mary (born 1516)
- Anne Boleyn: married - 25 Jan 1533, died - 19 May 1536, had Elizabeth (born 1533)
- Jane Seymour: married - 30 May 1536, died - Oct 1537, had Edward (born 1537)
- Anne of Cleves: married: Jan 1540, marriage annulled - July 1540
- Katherine Howard: married - July 1540, died - Nov 1541
- Catherine Parr: married - July 1543, died - 1548.
Catherine of Aragon:
The Break with Rome
1509-27
Henry's Foreign Policy aims:
- Henry had seven FP aims, as his father was the 7th Henry, and had 7 main objectives for the consolidation of his dynasty. These included:
- Prestige: Hugely concerned about his reputation, wanted to be considered 'the most goodliest King to have ever reigned', desperately wanted to outdo Henry V.
- Ambitious and aggressive FP towards French: Since Edward III, all Kings of England had also claimed the title King of France. Nationwide xenophobia encouraged Henry's impulses for a French War. Exemplified by the threat of the Auld Alliance between Scotland and France (originating around 1295/6).
- Honour and glory: Saw war as the main route of achieving this. Rivalry with Francis I and Charles V influenced by concerns over 'honour'.
- Maintaining links with the Netherlands: Vital to English cloth trade, which depended on Antwerp market. Controlled by the HRE, who allied with England against France.
- Peacemaker of Europe: Under Wolsey particularly, Henry pursued honour through means of peace, arguably because unable to be achieved via war.
- Securing his destiny: Aim of all early monarchs. Unsuccessfully tried to marry off relatives.
- Collecting his pension: Claim to throne and quest for honour arguably flexible. Demand for pension constant. Pension was the amount that France agreed to pay England every year to make up for English lands lost/surrendered to France. Demands for this present in all French wars. Conflict proved to be more expensive than the pension could make up for.
The French Wars
The First French War: - 1512-14, cost Henry £892,000.
The Second French War:
- 1522-25. Cost Henry £401,000.
- England declared war on France for the second time May 1522.
- Charles V, HRE, was focusing his attention upon Italy - recovering Milan from France in 1521, and winning La Bicocca in 1522. This meant that England had no aid in its offensive, which actually started out quite effectively; they made successful raids on Picardy.
- 1523: Duke of Bourbon, French nobleman, took up arms against Francis. Opened up possibility of three pronged attack - this man, English and HRE, and new agreements were subsequently drawn up.
- The Duke of Suffolk began his march on Paris with 11,000 troops in August. This failed due to the lack of commitment from the other two forces.
- Wolsey began to search for a route to peace, but this was interrupted by the Battle of Pavia, 1525.
The Third French War: 1542-46, cost Henry £2,144,765
French Pension:
- 1475, pension starts being paid when Louis XI agreed to pay Edward IV £10,000
- Charles VIII agreed to pay Henry VII £10,000 per annum
- 1512 pension suspended due to 1st FW
- 1518 Pension increased
- 1525 Pension increased
- 1527 Henry VIII to receive £21,316
- 1542 Pension arrears £205, 379
Total paid by French in reign of Henry VIII: £730,379
Early relations:
- France: Revising hostilities saw as a way for Henry to prove himself to people of England. Led army there 1512 as part of international alliance - Henry was drawn into the Holy League (Swiss, Pope, Venetians and Ferdinand of Aragon) in 1511. He agreed to attack South-West France as part of this. Little achieved. Soldiers returned to England. Embarrassment for Henry VIII, who had been desperate to go. Later in 1513, Wolsey organises second expedition. This was seen as a huge success. English drove off French in 'Battle of the Spurs', captured Tournai. 1514: Treaty of Sain Germaine-en-laye, negotiated by Wolsey, cements achievements. England in possession of Tournai and Therouanne, and gained pension arrears as right to French throne recognised. Sister Mary marries Louis XII (slightly undermined by his untimely death). Henry had gained sought after reputation.
- Scotland: 1512, Scots allied with French. James IV led army to North-East England with intention of diverting English troops from going to France. Catherine acting as regent while Henry in France. Earl of Surrey given title Lieutenant-General of the North, instructed to repel invasion. Battle of Flodden (Sept 1513), often referred to as last large scale medieval style battle in England. English lost 15,000 men, Scots lost 10,000. KING JAMES IV KILLED! Tremendous blow to Scottish, enhanced reputation of English army. Scotland no longer threat, would not be for a while; regent King.
- Overall, pretty good ngl. However, Henry's impotence and lack of experience really came to the surface, and what made matters even worse was his lack of self-awareness regarding this. His campaign was not so much a 'quest for glory' as it was a night out for 'football hooligans', the majority driven by xenophobia rather than honour. He was betrayed, somewhat, by Ferdinand, who did not invade as he had promised, capturing Navarre for himself before making peace with France. The French/Burgundian borders of Tournai and Therouanne best benefited Maximilian, not Henry, in terms of strategic gain. England was demonstrated to be third fiddle when it came to military power and strategy.
Things changed: - In 1515, Louis XII died. He was followed by Ferdinand in 1516, and Maximilian I in 1519. Louis' grandson, Francis I, acceded to the French throne. Ferdinand and Maximilian's deaths meant that their common grandson - Charles V - would inherit both Spanish and the HRE. The power balance within Europe was entirely thrown off. Francis I saw many achievement immediately after his coronation - such as his victory at Marignano in 1515 (seizure of Milan), and the Franco-Spanish Treaty of Noyon in 1516, which gave huge territorial concessions to France. There was an agreement between Francis and Charles in 1517, followed by the Anglo-French Treaty and the Treaty of London in 1518.
The Treaty of London:
- An attempt on Wolsey's behalf to manipulate the situation in Europe, moulding a reality in which England was not at the bottom of the list in terms of popularity, military, political and strategic strength.
- 1518: Pope Leo X called for a crusade to half the spread of the Ottoman empire in Eastern Europe.
- Wolsey viewed this as an opportunity to place England at the centre of European democracy. He called for all major powers to live under 'universal peace', rather than focusing on the crusade.
- More than 24 countries signed the treaty.
- 3rd October 1518, Wolsey sang mass at St Paul's for Henry and the French ambassadors following the signing of the Treaty of London the day before. Following this, they dined at the Bishop of London's and headed to Durham House, attending another banquet (!).
- The Treaty was, ultimately, short lived, and Charles V's appointment as leader of the HRE and Spain served as its main downfall, as it completely interrupted the power balance, subsequently raising tensions far too high to allow for 'eternal peace' to reign. The fact that this one event could entirely negate the Treaty, evidences that Wolsey was extremely naive and optimistic in his formulation of it as a concept. He simply could not have believed that this Treaty would last for a substantial amount of time.
Following the Treaty of London: - 1518: Sept - the Anglo-French Peace Treaty, Oct - Treaty of London.
- 1519: Jan - Death of Maximilian I, beginning of rivalry between Charles and Francis for the election of the next HRE. June - election of Charles as HRE.
- 1520: May - Charles V visited England, June - Field of the Cloth of Gold, July - Henry and Wolsey met Charles.
THE FIELD OF THE CLOTH OF GOLD:
- Charles was officially elected HRE in 1519, completing his dominance over Europe. Whatever effect the Treaty of London may have had, was shaken.
- He was now ruler of Spain, the HRE and the Netherlands. France was entirely circled by his territory, and French lands in Italy were also threatened. Francis' good streak upon his ascension had come to a halt. As mentioned, in 1515 he seized Milan at Marignano - this was directly challenged by Charles' imperial claim over Milan, stemming from his grandfather.
- Francis and Charles were clearly at odds with each other. Henry and Wolsey were at odds with what to do. They tried to remain neutral for a while, planning meetings with both sides, such as the FotCoG in June 1520, before which and after which they met with Charles.
AFTER THE FOTCOG:
- Francis declared war on Charles after Charles invaded Luxembourg.
- A Conference at Calais (the Calais Conference) was held, grouping all three parties. Wolsey acted as a arbiter, as the others played for time and vied for England's alliance. Henry would have to make a decision, he did not have the leverage to himself become an arbiter or referee.
IN THE MEANTIME AND DECISION:
- 1521: breakout of Hapsburg-Valois War, lasted until 1559 (!).
- Treaty of Bruges: 2 days into the Calais Conference, Wolsey met with Charles V in Bruges. The Treaty of Bruges was signed: England and Charles would declare war on France is Francis would not make peace. This was to be a secret until after Nov, when Henry next received an instalment of the pension.
- Charles agreed to compensate any missed pensions due to the war, and Mary Tudor was promised marriage to Charles.
The Valois-Hapsburg War:
- 1520-21: Henry was exactly where he wanted to be, conferring on important matters with the two major powers of Europe. This time was notable due to the meetings and conferences that dominated.
- Many historians emphasise Wolsey's personal aims, such as his aim to become Pope, or his want for humanistic peace. It is possible that Wolsey wanted to see Henry succeed, and this was his main motive for setting up these meetings and conferences: he was simply doing his job.
- When the Hapsburg-Valois Wars began, Henry could only decide who to follow, again, like his circumstances within the Calais Conference, 1521.
The Battle of Pavia, 1525:
- Feb 1525: Francis and his troops trapped in Pavia, in Northern Italy.
- Francis himself captured, and 10,000 French soldiers killed.
- Balance of power as of Hapsburg-Valois rocked.
- Henry proposed joint attack on France, leading to himself becoming King of France and Charles becoming monarch of all Christendom.
- Wolsey launched Amicable Grant, a forced loan to pay for the invasion. This failed due to the serious opposition that the grant provoked.
FOLLOWING the Battle of Pavia:
- 1525: Anglo-French Treaty of the More, friendship treaty.
- 1526: League of Cognac formed against the HRE (France, Venice, Papacy, Florence, exiled Duke of Milan).
- 1526: England join League of Cognac
- 1527: Anglo-French Treaty of Westminster
- 1527: Treaty of Amiens - Anglo-French attack on Charles V. No Anglo-French war until 1543.
The Battle of Pavia, 1525:
1529-30
FP during the quest for divorce:
- Problems: By criticising his decision to launch a papal dispensation for Catherine to marry Henry, provided her claims that her marriage with Arthur was not consummated, Henry was literally attacking the Church.
- Henry, somewhat obviously, was challenging the authority of the Roman Catholic Church in creating the Church of England and removing the Pope as the Head of the Church.
- Most of the 30s: European powers focused to South. Ottomans had taken over Mediterranean, challenging Charles.
- Cromwell focused on achieving Henry's divorce and establishing him as the head of the church in England. He only really paid attention to Europe upon matters concerning the Break with Rome. Henry was excommunicated in 1538.
- England was desperately in need of an ally against Spain and France following the Break with Rome. Many had turned to Lutheranism in the Catholic HRE, forming the Schmalkaldic League in 1531, searching for Protestant allies. Nothing came of Cromwell's deliberation in forming an alliance with the League, the opportunity entirely wasted. When Charles was angered over the divorce of his aunt (?) Catherine, it would have been natural of Cromwell to turn to France. However, again, nothing came of this. Henry/Cromwell were too focused on the internal, personal aim of seeing the Break with Rome and Reformation through, that they neglected their FP objectives.
- 1538: there was a truce in the Wars between Francis and Charles (Truce of Nice), which led to Henry's fear of a joint invasion of England, with the backing of the Pope. May have influenced Henry's decision to establish the Six Articles in 1539, which restated some key Catholic doctrines.
- Comwell arranged the marriage between Henry and Anne of Cleves. Anne was the sister of the protestant Duke of Germany. Cromwell was supposedly 'misinformed' about her appearance, to which HEnry took an immediate dislike upon her arrival to England in 1539.
- Anne and Henry married 1540, before divorcing the same year. Francis and Charles resumed their rivalry regardless, negating the need for an alliance.
1540-47
Scotland:
- James V pursued a pro-French policy. Ex. Married Mary of Guise in 1538 - she was a relative of James V.
- Attempted negotiations for a peace treaty between James and Henry were constantly trialled, however they always failed due to lack of commitment on behalf of James. An agreement would have guaranteed England's security, but James' inability to turn up both prevented this and humiliated Henry.
- 1542: Henry was irritated and concerned. He sent the Duke of Norfolk to attack the Scots. The campaign was a military success - the Battle of Solway-Moss in Nov 1542 saw the defeat of the Scottish army. 1,000 Scots were taken prisoner, and James V, who could not make the battle on account of his health, died only a week following. He left the crown to his daughter Mary - Mary, Queen of Scots.
- The Treaty of Greenwich proposed a marriage between Mary and Edward. This proved too much for the Scots, and the plans collapsed. The War was renewed, and the Scottish again turned to the French. 1544,45: the Earl of Hertford took the English army on a series of raids in the border region. Brutal and kind of unjustified - Scotland only alienated further.
- Upon his death, Henry had prevented France and Scotland from allying against him, but at a great financial cost.
- The Crown was kept out of debt by repeated requests to parliament for subsidies, reduction in the value of silver coins, sale of monastic lands. Led to issues further along the line: 'papering over the cracks'.
Europe:
- 1541: Francis I and Charles V at war. 1542, France allies with Ottoman Turks against Habsburgs. This encouraged Henry to enter fray, along with victory over Scots. Allied with Habsburgs. Both promise to invade France within 2 years.
- 1544: Henry sailed with army of 48,000 to Calais. Meant to march on Paris with Charles. Both followed their own priorities and blamed the other for deserting.
- Henry headed to Boulogne, wanting glory for himself, but was captured.
- Charles and Francis signed a peace treaty.
- The English fortify Boulogne, and Henry returns to England, claiming triumph.
- Francis threatened invasion, so Henry reinforced fortifications on the South Coast.
- The invasion attempt in 1545 failed due to weather conditions, French incompetence and the fact that they lacked a base. The defences at Boulogne held out, and both sides stated their readiness to discuss peace.
- Treaty of Ardres, 1546: Henry to keep Boulogne, and was promised continued French pension, were Boulogne returned in 1554.
- The war had cost 2 million pounds , paid for by large-scale borrowing, sale of monastic land and debasement. This contributed to Henry's legacy of debt and inflation.
- It can be argued, however, that Henry achieved more than Francis or Charles. He did achieve the capture of Boulogne and saw success with the Treaty of Ardres. His reputation was enhanced, and his initial aim of acquisition of glory somewhat fulfilled.
Ireland:
- Henry regarded Ireland as troublesome, rebellious, kind of like the North, except worse. Henry VII had not seen particular/outstanding success there. The Fitzgeralds, the leading Irish family, had supported Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck. Real English control within Ireland was limited to a small area near Dublin.
- 1536: Thomas Fitzgerald led a rebellion against the English crown. This was motivated by the religious changes within England. Fitzgerald announced his support for the Pope, and Charles. This was before Protestant doctrines had even been introduced.
- The rebellion was put down brutally, and a more solid government was set up to prevent similar rebellions in the future and to stop Ireland from continuing to serve as a base for England's foreign rivals. Fitzgerald lost power as Lord-Deputy.
- 1540: Henry went further and declared a New Kingdom of Ireland. Anthony St Leger was sent as the first English governor. All lands in England were surrendered to Henry, and would be returned given pledges of loyalty to Henry by their original owners. Some Irish lords were to be given seats in the Houses of Parliament as a result. Leger only held control of a very small area around Dublin, in reality - not much had changed.
- Henry then set about trying to establish royal authority across the nation. Pinciples of English common law were to be extended throughout. The process of breaking down what were feudal territories, proved to be slow and took until the 17th century to complete. This was known as the Policy of Plantations, and had begun in the reign of Edward IV. In Elizabeth's reign, thousand of protestants were sent to Ireland due to this policy, facing brutality and execution.
- Henry's reign marked the removal of Ireland from clan-based Gaelic structure to a far more modern, centralised monarchical state, typical to the rest of Europe. The Irish clung on to their faith for the Pope and Catholic beliefs, despite Henry's attempts to reinforce his religious authority throughout the nation.
- More on Ireland in Local and Regional Gov of Society.
Dissolution of the monasteries
Societal Reform and Social Impact of Religious Change
Regional divisions
Elites and Commoners:
- The nobility: There was an increase in the size of the nobility; thought to have been due to natural wastage (natural dying off of old/traditional families) and the number of attainders issued. The increase was not massive. Only one duke upon Henry's inheritance of the throne - the Duke of Buckingham. Henry only made two Dukes - the Duke of Suffolk (due to closeness to King) and the Duke of Norfolk (restored title). Henry did also bestow property unto the nobility, though this was often in a self-beneficial manner. Nobles were expected to be hospitable and sociable, especially towards their affinity. However this may provoke the King's suspicion if too excessive (ex. Duke of Buckingham, executed 1521). Other examples of Henry's punishment - Baron Montague, the Marquess of Exeter (both relatives of Henry), and the Lords Darcy and Hussey (their roles in the PoG).
- The gentry: The size of the nobility is also thought to have increased, however this is debated and hard to confirm. Both professional and commercial men grew in number, led to rise of 'gentlemen'. Many members of the gentry were drawn into unpaid administration for Henry, for example, Law and Order admin now carried out by laymen rather than clergymen as was standard previously.Roughly 5000 gentry families in 1540, 2000 knightly families in 1524 (knighthoods were given to those in favour).
- Commoners: Little dramatic change in standard of living for commoners during Henry's reign. Rise in inflation did lead to drop in income, meaning for rebellions such as Amicable Grant. Many lower class English people lived in small rural communities, working as self-sufficient peasant smallholders (husbandmen). Prosperous peasants could accrue land and join the rank of the yeomen. Urbanisation continued to occur. General disorder was common, where large-scale rebellions proved rare.
The Pilgrimage of Grace
Causes of the Lincolnshire rebellion/the Pilgrimage of Grace:
- Defence of the faith ; The imagery, oaths and propaganda of the pilgrims gave the rebellion a deliberately cultivated religious resonance. Justifying the rebellion and providing the motivation that was needed to sustain it. The rebels demands were also fashioned around the recent religious turmoil within England: they called for an end to the draining of the Church's wealth, renunciation of the Oath of Supremacy and Princess Mary's rehabilitation.
- Taxation; The rebels articles also majorly featured the King's constant demand for taxes. Cromwell's recently introduced tactic of taxation in times of peace was evidently not well received by the people of England. Ex. 1534 Subsidy Act. There was also opposition to the Statute of Uses, which introduced what was essentially a feudal tax upon aristocratic landed inheritance
- The Dissolution of the Monasteries; The welfare of the North was dependent on the monasteries for the social, economic and spiritual significance that they provided. This included providing food, clothing and shelter to the poor/travellers, acting as safe houses for the good and providing tenancies for farmers. Robert Aske claimed this to be the greatest cause of the rebellion, and, again, religion was at the core of the rebel's demands.
- Food shortages; Bad harvests in 1535 and 36 means for agricultural issues, that mainly affected the peasants, however could be argued to also have affected the gentry (loss of produce etc). Renewal of tenancies, border tenures, enclosure and rack-renting (raising rent) all were discussed within the rebel's demands.
- Aristocratic feud: Some histroians (Elton specifically), have argued the rebellion to be an attempt by disaffected nobility to increase their power/influence within court, having been angered by the position that low-born ministers, Ex. Wolsey and Cromwell, managed to achieve. Also irritated by Anne Boleyn's rise to power.
- Opposition to Cromwell's policies: The North saw itself as under attack by the greedy crown regime, and it was believed that Cromwell was the puppet master behind this. The Treason Act, Royal Supremacy and even heresy, were all seen as pieces of Cromwell's work. It became common that nobles would even scapegoat Cromwell's henchmen - members of the Court of Augmentation/those who helped to compile the VE and CM - in order to gain leverage in debates at court.
Events:
- Some 40,000 people participated in the rebellion, which proved to be the largest and most serious revolt of the sixteenth century.
- Henry was never seriously threatened by the rebellion, however the maintenance of Law and Order in the North was risked.
- The rebellion only halted the dissolution of the monasteries for a short amount of time, while Henry recovered from the shock of the revolt.
- Robert Aske, a Yorkshire lawyer, heard of the uprising on the 4 Oct 1536. He called men to maintain the Holy Church. The uprising is seen as a series of interconnected regional revolts rather than one consistent rebellion.
- 10 Oct, Aske led 30,000 men.
- He established HQ in York, before marching to Pontefract castle, the most important stronghold in the North. 21 Nov: Lord Darcy hands over Pontefract as soon as the rebels arrive.
- Aske ensured that all goods were paid for and no murders committed - to this extent, the rebellion could be argued peaceful.
- The force that Darcy had managed to gather, was far larger than the King could afford to counter with, taken completely by surprise. He sent a delegation led by the Duke of Norfolk (Thomas Howard) to buy himself time.
- The rebels presented the Duke of Norfolk with five demands - the York articles.
The YORK articles: Drawn up by Aske and then sent to the mayor of York 15 Oct. Also shown to the Duke of Norfolk when their forces met with the government. Nine specifically religious, while six politically concerned. The rest were a combination of political, social, economic and religious. - A truce was signed on the 27 October, stating that Ralph Ellerker and Robert Browne were to meet with the King. Pilgrims kept their chain of demand firmly in place. At the meeting, Henry offered no exceptions, but agreed that he would pardon all ten ringleaders of the rebellion.
- Representatives of the host armies met again at Pontefract from the 2-4 Dec, in order to finalise their demands. They produced a list of 24 key articles - the Pontefract Articles.
The PONTEFRACT articles: Drawn up by the nobility amongst the rebels, and so were not representative of the many/the poor commoners who were not invited to attend the meeting at all. Again, nine with a focus on religion, and six with a focus on politics. Rest combination of social, economic, political and religious. - The Pontefract Articles were presented to Norfolk. Henry had given Norfolk permission to grant a general pardon, a prolonged truce, and a parliament session in which their demands would be discussed.
- Aske insisted that dissolution of the monasteries must be suspended before any parliament session was to take place.
- The commons accepted these terms, and began to disperse on Dec 8, after the Lancaster Herald had read out the King's pardon.
Aftermath: - Despite the fact that the Lincolnshire rebellion quickly collapsed when the Duke of Suffolk's forces began to make their way in the direction of the revolt. Following this, rebels took control of Pontefract, having established bases in York and Hull. This greatly alarmed Henry and his governing officials. - An army under the control of the Duke of Norfolk was then sent to challenge this group of rebels. However, this force could not compare in size to that of the rebels. - Norfolk sought to defuse the rebellion through issue of pardon, and the promise that a free parliament would be established alongside the restoration of the dissolved monasteries. - The King, of course, never intended to take anyone up on these promises. - The excuse Henry needed to go back on his word was bought with the Cumberland Rebellion in 1537. - The Duke of Norfolk was therefore justified in his decision to declare martial law and hang 74 of the rebels. Following this initial harsh response, he was rather lenient on the remaining rebels, taking proper legal concern. - A number of rebel leaders, Darcy and Hussey, were executed, alongside selected members of the gentry and heads of the monastic houses. - Henry was undoubtedly shook by the rebellion, which escalated partly due to his own inability to respond to the mood of his people. - The Duke of Norfolk was particularly effective in his dealings with the rebels, and eventual means of finding a conclusion to the trouble. The pilgrimage did not slow the pace of the dissolution, as was one of its main aims.
The Lincolnshire Rebellion, Oct 1536:
- Commissions had been happening prior to the rebellion, involving the dissolution of smaller monasteries, the collection of subsidy, inquiries into the Church's morality and wealth, and the enforcing of new religious rules. It was rumoured that commissioners were seizing (in other words, looting) jewels, relics, gold and extra taxes.
- Began at Louth on 1 Oct, with Horncastle rising in Lincoln.
- People of Horncastle set upon the chancellor of the Bishop of Lincoln and murdered him.
- The revolt was led by a local shoemaker, Nicholas Melton, but was soon overrun with people from every social class, who all grouped together to give their list of demands. There were 10,000 people in total.
- When the Duke of Suffolk's army drew near, the people scarpered in fear. The gentry fled, begging for forgiveness and likewise attempting to deny their role within the rising. The commons dispersed, confused.
- The few that remained were ordered to go home when the Government's herald arrived on the 11 Oct.
The Cumberland Rebellion, Jan - Feb 1537: Bigod's own dissatisfaction with the outcome of The Pilgrimage of Grace, his suspicion of the government, and his perception that further rebellion was a more popular notion within England. //// Robert Aske toured the North, attempting to convince others of the deal that he had made to the gentry, and popularise his cause. //// Sir Francis Bigod remained unconvinced, questioning the sincerity of the government. //// Robert Aske fervently opposed another rebellion, putting his faith in the promises that he had been made. He had even been asked to join the King for Christmas at Hampton Court. //// Nevertheless, Bigod planned to capture Hull and Scarborough, and to force the Duke of Norfolk to act as a go between the government and rebels. //// 16 Jan 1537: Bigod's plan went into operation. Bigod's operation collapsed after a few days. He fled to Cumberland, where commons had launched their own unsuccessful attack on Carlisle in early Feb. //// 10 Feb: Bigod is captured in Cumberland
Background:
- Monasteries were central to the social and spiritual lives of every sector of society. It was where monks said masses and prayers for the dead. Henry VII had 10,000 masses said for him following his death, by monks. They were also centres of education and art: the architecture, carvings, statues and paintings//the texts etc.
- There were several monastic orders that existed in the reign of Henry VIII: Benedictines (largest, wealthiest), Cistercians (break away from Benedictines, lived simpler lives), Carthusians (strictest), Dominicans (Black Friars), Carmelites (White Friars), Franciscans (Grey Friars).
- Early 1500s: 825 religious houses in England and Wales. Over 500 were monateries. Many owned land and employed villagers, providing livelihood for those villages. By 1540, these were all closed.
Causes:
- An end to opponents of the BREAK WITH ROME. Some of the most passionate opponents of the BWR were monks, especially Carthusians and Grey Friars.
- CONTINENTAL INFLUENCE. Monasteries were being dissolved in Germany and Scandanavia. The ideas of Erasmus, Tyndale and Fish, which criticised monasteries, were becoming popular.
- PATRONAGE and GREED. The laity were gaining an increasing appetite for land, following 1536 act. Even Catholics, such as Norfolk, participated in the sale of monastic land/were quick to cash in. This pacified critics of the BWR, as it eased the pain of the religious turmoil/upheaval.
- FINANCIAL motives. Financial resources of the Church were huge. Though the Crown was certainly wealthy enough already, there were FP concerns at this time over a potential crusade, as well as Henry's excommunication and the Pope calling on Francis and Charles to attack. Monastic wealth was needed to pay for fortifications. Rather than impose taxes, Cromwell gave Henry the chance to accrue wealth via a different method.
- IMPERIALISM. Henry's growing sense of xenophobia is somewhat manifested in the Dissolution of the Monasteries and the Reformation; the idea of monasteries owing an allegiance to institutions outside of England became unacceptable to him.
Events:
- The ACT of FIRST FRUITS AND TENTHS, 1534: allowed Henry to tax the Church.
- COMMISSIONERS, 1535: Cromwell sent out commissioners to survey the value of monastic land, and the condition of the Church. VALOR ECCLESIASTICUS.
Comperta Monastica - Cromwell's first actions after being made Vicegerent. Assembled team to visit nation's religious houses, compiled of his own men (John ap Rhys, Thomas Legh, Richard Layton etc. Mainly secular clergy concerned over value/quality of monastic vocation), looking for faults, detailed any offences against the crown, and whether or not the monastery was complying with the Oath of Supremacy.
Valor Ecclesiasticus - Cromwell's greatest project, largest survey of ecclesiastical wealth and property ever taken - like Tudor Domesday book. Valued taxes paid to crown from ecclesiastical property and income previously paid to Pope. Undertaken by gentry. Allowed gov to have an understanding of the wealth of the Church. £320,000 - £360,000, with omissions taken into account.
Impact of CM and VE: Provided ammunition for those determined to close the monasteries. Evidence manipulated before being circulated. Cromwell able to demonise monasteries with evidence such as only 3% of considerable income regularly given to charity. Cromwell managed to convince King of need for Dissolution. Widespread immorality and sexual perversion detailed in the CM far more condemning, Cromwell provided signed confessions of those who had admitted breaking their vow of chastity.
- COMMISSIONERS, 1535: Cromwell sent out commissioners to survey the value of monastic land, and the condition of the Church. VALOR ECCLESIASTICUS.
- The ACT for the DISSOLUTION OF SMALLER MONASTERIES, 1536. Closed all religious houses valued under £200 a year. New commissioners sent out, provoking rebellions in Yorkshire/Lincolnshire.
- CLOSURES. 1537-8. Further closures.
- The ACT for the DISSOLUTION OF LARGER MONASTERIES, 1539: All religious houses except Chantries to be closed.
- COURT OF AUGMENTATIONS, 1540: Richard Rich as Chancellor, in charge of handling income and finances as a result of the Dissolution.
Impacts:
- Monastic buildings: Henry charged with cultural vandalism for his destruction of relics, statues, architecture, books etc. True, though he did reinvest some of the money gained into cathedral grammar schools. Ex. Canterbury, Carlisle, Bristol, Ely.
- Monks and Friars: Majority of monks and friars found alternative paid employment within the Church. 6500 left out of the 8000 that moved on, having collected their pensions.
- Nuns were less well off. 2000 nuns neither allowed to marry or become priests.
To what extent did commoners change?
- Decline in economic and political power saw disappearance of serfdom and labour services.
- Some serfdom still existed, but most peasantry relatively free to move around the country as they pleased.
- Many peasants took advantage of land availability and increased their holdings from 12-16 hectares to 80. They could then join the rank of the yeoman.
- Commoners with skills and trades moved to the towns in order to build up their businesses (urbanisation).
To what extent did Elites change?
- Major changes began as the landscape evolved to be far more individualistic and competitive.
- Elites began to struggle to hold their large estates. Crown became far more attractive prospect for lesser elites, and great households were leased or sold out.
- Urban elite (merchants, retailers, craftsmen) rose in power and status, meaning that they had more of a voice.
- No profit for the large aristocratic estates,as prices and rent kept increasing.
- Often only made money from land by waiting for a lease to run out before repossessing it.
- Gentry began to benefit from land increases, and became a far more prominent class within the English social hierarchy.
Employment:
- Beginning of modern capitalist system formed.
- Poorer members of society beginning to own less and less land, instead found employment as farm labourers, or in industries such as the cloth industry, or lace making. Worked for wages, instead of food for families.
- Result of increased engrossment and wealthy yeomen forcibly buying farms to merge them into larger, more industrious farms.
- 'Putting out' system introduced - Wealthy men would provide the families with materials needed to produce items ex. lace, nails, cutlery. The families would then have to pay back the cost of the tools to the wealthy men, receiving very little pay for finished products, in comparison with the time/effort that it took to make them.
Social Reforms:
- Cromwell tried to introduce reforms many times, particularly targeting local government by attacking territorial franchises ('liberties'). In doing so, he only served to impede the operation of royal justice.
- He passed the Act for Continuing of Certain Liberties and Franchises in 1536. This limited local anomalies and prevented local religious/feudal officials from interfering with JPs and sheriffs performing their duties.
- The balance of power still lay with gentry/landowners who acted as sheriffs or JPs, regardless of his attempted reforms.
- Cromwell made some strides in addressing the socio-economic problems that existed. 'Commonwealth' measures (that would provide the King's subjects with full social and economic justice) had been called for by intellectuals. It has been argued by certain historians (Morris in 1998), that Cromwell sympathised with these measures and promoted them before Parliament contained them.
- 1531 and 1532: Acts passed to fix prices of certain foodstuffs at reasonable price.
- Act in 1533 attempted to create machinery needed to determine fair food prices, however this soon fell through as it was impossible, and was repealed in 1542.
Vagabonds:
- This problem had started int he reign of Henry VII and continued into that of Henry VIII.
- Cromwell initiated the 'poor laws':
- 1531: Tudor Poor Law, the 'Vagabonds Act'. Alms and foodstuffs distributed to the poor, up to 200 people came a day for Cromwell's support. Act created distinction between those who were unable to work, who were given licenses to beg, and those who were unwilling, who were punished. JPs were responsible for administrating this/carrying it through, and no real provision was made for those who were unable to work, despite the law. They still had to rely on Churches or Charity.
- 1536: Cromwell strengthened the act, made significant improvements. Biggest changes included that parishes now legally had to CARE for the poor, JPs and sheriffs had to PROVIDE CHARITY WORK for the weak/helpless and carry out ALMS (money/charity) COLLECTIONS, provided MATERIALS for the idle and the able bodied to work so that they could make their OWN LIVING, and that parishes were enforced to appoint two OVERSEERS of the poor to administer and collect the money contributed to them (ensured that they would not resort to begging, given take of accounting for what they had received and contributed).
Social impact of religious change:
- Monasteries had a key role to play within their community (offering jobs, welfare services, education and hospitals), which was lost as of the dissolution.
- Their loss had a devastating impact upon the social and economic well-being of the communities that they served.
- Some major monastic churches, such as Durham, were the cathedrals of the diocese, whereas others doubled up as the local parish.
- Religious upheaval led to rebellion in the North of England and in Ireland.
- Prior to Henry's 1530s reforms, there were relatively few complaints about the clergy. A small amount of people welcomed the changes, but there was no overwhelming amount of support.
Regional problems in Wales, Ireland and the North:
- Ireland: Henry used Irish offices as rewards for his courtiers. He replaced the Earl of Kildare in 1519 with Thomas Howard. His arrival in 1520 with an army, effectively bought the whole nation under his control. Thomas Cromwell began to interfere in Ireland to ensure that officials there were loyal to him and not Kildare, following several rebellions.
- Wales: Maintaining Law and Order in Wales and the Marches was crucial to prevention of rebellion. Cromwell became active in Wales, restoring good governance. Francises Act, 1536: constitutional amendment that bought the administration of Wales in line with England. Abolished the rights of any semi-autonomous lands that had existed there.
- North: The Council in York was set up to govern this region. Southerners were often appointed to rule. Monasteries were an integral part of Northern life, explaining the large proportion of northerners that participated in the Pilgrimage of Grace.
Policies in Wales, Ireland and the North:
- Wales: Wales Act of 1536 - Divided Wales into shire counties, operating similarly to English counties. Welsh shires had direct representation in the Commons. Wales would now have the same legal framework as England. Wales had lost its individual identity, save from the survival of the Welsh language - the Acts of Union. Control over Wales still exercised on Crown's behalf. Became the responsibility of members of the aristocracy such as the earls of Pembroke, who controlled county politics and became prominent within the legal profession - they were elected by parliament.
- Ireland: Henry adopted the title the King of Ireland in 1541. The crown kept a tight control over the Irish parliament.
- The North: The North created trouble as it was so far away from Parliament. After the PoG Henry and Cromwell established the Council in the North as a permanent body - had both legal and admin. functions and kept the North quiet during the rebellion of 1549. Northerners resented the appointment of Southerners to the council.
How did religious change affect Ireland?
- Earl of Kildare arrested after making it clear that he would not permit reformation of the Church within Ireland. Died in the Tower of London in 1534.
- Rebellion spread throughout Ireland, led by Silken Thomas (Kildare's son), causing Henry to order a military response.
- Feb 1537, Silken and five of his uncles were executed and Ireland had surrendered.
- 1538: legal reformation of the Irish Church complete with the dissolution of the monasteries. Leaders took English titles, with the hopes of regaining lands to pass to their eldest sons - this was known as 'Surrender and re-grant'. The issue with this was that land belonged to kin, not the elected head of the family, so attempts to impose English traditions onto Irish families were limited.
- June 1541, Anthony St Leger established a new direction in Irish policy. An Act of the Irish Parliament declared Henry the King of Ireland. The Act established the English monarchy independent claim to lands in Ireland.
Wolsey's approach to economy:
- Wolsey needed the economy to remain prosperous, in order to be able to draw from the King's sources of income ex.extraordinary and ordinary revenue.
- Wolsey realised these sources of finance were unsustainable, and sought to improve the structure of finance ex. property taxes made into fixed rates (can't change with inflation), but this just meant that the Crown could not profit as much.
- National survey of 1522, investigated who could pay and how much. Raised £200,000, but was a short term solution to raising finances.
- Recoinage 1526, Introduced new coins and reduced silver used in coins. Aimed to make money more available and cheaper to make. Had brief success, but was internationally confusing, resulted in price increases. Suffering meant riots in 1528.
Cromwell's approach to economy:
- Increased specialisation within the government to deal with finances.
- Ensured more consistent income for Crown.
- Ex. Court of Augmentations (Controlled land and finances previously held by Catholic Church), Court of General Surveyors (controlled ex-monastic land and finances), Court of First Fruits and Tenths (controlled tax previously sent to Pope), Court of Wards (Feudal right to collect from the estate of a minor under age 21 who had inherited)
Trade:
- Volume of English trade decreased during the first half of the 1500s.
- Cloth exports continued to rise but the market of raw wool declined. Woollen cloth exports almost doubled, and tin and hide increased too.
- Increasing amounts of cloth exports routed through London. Had a negative impact on ports such as Bristol, Hull and Boston, who found it difficult to compete with London's traders.
- Biggest change in the cloth industry was the increase in cheaper fabrics ex Kersey, a coarse woollen cloth made in Suffolk that was lighter than that traditionally made.
- 70% of cloth exports transported by English merchants from 1550s. Before this, trade was largely dominated by other countries.
- Ability to keep up with the increasing demand for cloth depended on the effectiveness of the woollen industry. This industry grew during the first half of the 16th century, but it is difficult to determine by how much.
- Woollen industry worked on a domestic basis: children carded wool, women spun and men weaved. Wool then passe don for treatment. Three areas that saw growth in the cloth industry: West Riding of Yorkshire, East Anglia, West Country. Work not always secure, could lead to poverty.
- Serious profit could be made by rich clothiers who could then enhance their social status. Ex. William Stumpe of Malmesbury in Wiltshire, who later became and MP for Malmesbury.
- Some growth in mining industry. Cornish tin was still a prised export. Lead mining in the Pennines and Coal mining in the North-East were growing in importance.
- Black furnaces produced an increasing amount of iron ore in the Weald of Sussex and Kent. Middle of the century: their number equalled 26. Upsurge in iron-ore smelting to come in second half of the century.
- Increases in exports counterbalanced by imports of wine. Suggests spending power of wealthy increased.
- A 'factor' would produce raw materials Outputters spun cotton into yarn then wove it. A merchant trader sold the finished product. This was the cottage industry and 'outwork'. Products were not made in once place.
- Men did the housework, while women did the outwork and earned money for the family by spinning.
Exploration:
- Henry was uninterested in exploration and made no efforts to build on achievements of Cabot and the Bristol merchants at the end of the 1400s.
- Robert Thorne, a Bristol trader, continued his involvement in Iceland and Newfoundland fishery.
- Other explorers, except from Thorne, found themselves unable to win royal support for any venture.
- Sebastian Cabot remianed in Spain for the majority of Henry's reign, except from two short visits to England. He only returned after Edward VI took the throne.
Debasement of the Coinage:
- Debasement of the coinage took place during Henry VIII's reign . This was mixing common metals with precious metals while maintaining the face value of the coin. This was to create more money, but only led to inflation.
- Debasement of the coinage created a short term solution. There was an artificial boom in 1544 and 1546 but at a long-term cost to living standards.
- Debasement was started by Cardinal Wolsey in 1526. In the last few years the coinage was repeatedly debased.
- From around 1542, including the early part of Edward VI's reign, the value of the currency was depleted to less than 1/3 of its initial value.
- Most goods rose in price, particularly staple items. Hard to detect the starting point of this, and worse effected periods were later periods ex. price of corn doubled, rising 600% during the century (?!). Other prices also inflated but by less. Possible cause is population growth, as it saw increasing demand for subsistence items, but supply was inflexible and could not keep up with pace.
- Few innovations in agriculture took place during this period, and land reclamation for new cultivation was slow and expensive.
- Demand outstripped supply, and farmers and markets could then increase market price. Not just profiteering, but also a response to pressures on landowners including higher price of land and increased cost of living.
Prosperity and Depression:
- Population increased after 1525, which strained resources in England. The mortality rate also declined.
- Land used for pastoral needs, not arable. Led to an increase in enclosure.
- Stagnation in wages as migrants presented cheap labour, meant richest got richer and poor got poorer.
- From the 1520s, agricultural prices rose significantly, so there was an increase in farming incomes, enhanced by engrossing.
- There was a growing class of substantial farmers. Wealthier farm owners and landowners massively benefited from the increase in population. Richer becoming richer, poor staying poor etc.
- Bad harvests 1520-21, 1527-9, led to temporary increases in food prices.Food prices almost doubled during the reign of Henry VIII.
- Real wages began to decline after a period of stability. Worst at the end of Henry's reign when effects if debasement became evident.
- Over half of population in Coventry recorded as having no personal wealth, the same for a third of the population of Yarmouth.
- Growing population evident amongst rural labourers. Most moved to towns or cities.5000 migrants a year in the population of Ireland.
- Some made homeless as a result of engrossing, though the extent of this is difficult to judge.
- Enclosure created a moral problem, in that it forced people to live their homes.Thomas More's Utopia highlighted the harmful effects of enclosure, published in 1516. Wolsey launched and enclosure commission in response. 188 found to have enclosed land illegally. Legislation followed ex. 1534, attempted to limit sheep ownership. Enclosure limited to certain areas ex East Midland villages.
- Total population in Tudor England, including England and Wales: 1524 = 2.3 mill, 1541 = 2.7 mill, 1550 = 2.9 mill, 1569 = 3.2 mill, 1599 = 4 mill.
Engrossing, enclosure and anti-enclosure legislation:
- Most controversial and greatest change of the period was the spread of enclosure into the rich arable farming lands of the midlands.
- Meant a boundary was established around a field, so that livestock could be kept together, or so that one crop could be produced.
- More efficient for farmer, but led to eviction of tenants and changed their tradition.
- Enclosure took different forms: enclosure of common land most likely to provoke opposition. Villagers claimed rights to common land for pasturing animals, cutting timber or peat, and for fishing or hunting. Fencing these areas off deprived them of such means of producing resources. Reactions to enclosure were often violent. Mobs destroyed fences and hedges, and larger groups called petitions to grab the attention of the gov.
- Tudor govs were concerned, but they did not really act. JPs called to carry out any orders regarding limiting of enclosure. Little will to enforce issue, as these were same people doing the enclosure.
- Gov also realised enclosure stimulated the growth of the woollen industry and indirectly added to national wealth and increased tax revenues from export sales. Therefore, even the government was unwilling to entirely limit enclosure.
- The legislation passed reflects the awkward nature of their situation, and was rarely successful.
Legislation to aid the poor:
- There was an increase in poverty, a consequence of population growth and the subsequent inflation.
- In addition to localised job shortages, there were more permanent structural changes to the economy.
- Population growth means for a younger society, without the jobs to occupy the majority. Inflation means for a rise in prices, not for a rise in wages.
- The growing importance of the cloth industry, saw farmers changing their land usage to sheep tending rather than agriculture. This contributed to growing enclosure, which was resorted to in order to create pastureland.
- Gov action also exacerbated the problem; legislation to prevent nobles from keeping retainers, meant a reduction in the size of households, and added thousands to the job market.
- The dissolution of the monasteries may have forced ex-monks to look for work, in addition to removing monastic communities completely from local economies.Merchants who bought from/supplied monasteries saw a fall in their incomes, and the traditional social role of church houses (shelter, medical care, food) was completely removed. Many families pushed into poverty. Tudor governments initially not all that concerned.
- Authorities, however, were concerned regarding the dangers of begging and vagrancy, so main legislation recommended strict punishment for begging, in addition to the return of the vagrant to their original parish, to prevent any spread of the issue.
- Trying to discern the distinction between impotent and idle poor was too simple an evaluation of the problem.
- Initiative to take action came from local authorities rather than the gov. They collected and distributed donations, however these schemes relied on the wealthy.
- They were given added force by acts such as the 1572 Poor Relief Act, which made donations compulsory.
- Few authorities had sympathy for the idle poor, regarding them as a social nuisance and a source of crime. They met them with punishment and eviction.
- 1572: more recognition given to those genuinely unemployed due to circumstances rather than idleness. Government tried to support this group, especially through the 1590s. Such efforts produced variable results: some communities (such as Norwich) drew up detailed Poor Relief schemes but most failed to offer the same level of social support that the Church offered pre-Reformation.
Religion