Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Cyberbullying :cry: - Coggle Diagram
Cyberbullying :cry:
Relevance in Today's Society
36.5%
of people have been cyberbullied in their lifetime
17.4%
of students have been reported to have been cyberbullied in the previous 30 days (from study)
60%
of teenagers have experienced a type of cyberbullying
70%
of student have reported someone spreading rumours about them online
87%
of young people have seen cyberbullying occurring online
95%
of students are connected to the internet
85% of students are using social media
(Gini & Possoli, 2013)
Recent statistics on Cyberbullying
The following statistics are about students who were impacted by cyberbullying:
41%
of students developed social anxiety
37%
of students developed and became depressed
26%
experienced suicidal thoughts
25%
of students engaged in self harm
20%
of students started skipping class
(Gini & Possoli, 2013)
Preventative Approaches
Inside the school environment
Teach students strategies to respond to cyberbullying
Define cyberbulling formally
School policy and procedure - reporting and investigating
Nationwide campaigns
Home Environment
Report and document (screenshots(
Talk and address the issue to parents/carers
Disengage from negative, toxic people (particualry ones you sinteract with online)
General Definitions
Definition
Cyberbullying is the bullying that takes place in a digital context or space, such as from phones, computers, tablets etc., which is transferred through to text messaging, social media, collaborative forums, online gaming and many other forms.
Types of Cyberbullying
Text Messages, Social Media, online forums, online gaming, email, skype, websites, blogs, impersonation, hacking and impersonating
Cause & Effect
Research has shown that cyberbullying causes emotional and physiological damage to defenseless victims (Faryadi, 2011)
It may also cause psychosocial problems including inappropriate behaviours, drinking alcohol, smoking, depression and low commitment to academics (Walker et al, 2011)